The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation
Abstract
The concept of process maturity proposes that a process has a lifecycle that is assessed by the extent to which the process is explicitly defined, managed, measured and controlled. A maturity model assumes that progress towards goal achievement comes in stages. The supply chain maturity model presented in this paper is based on concepts developed by researchers over the past two decades. The Software Engineering Institute has also applied the concept of process maturity to the software development process in the form of the capability maturity model. This paper examines the relationship between supply chain management process maturity and performance, and provides a supply chain management process maturity model for enhanced supply chain performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Porter, M. E. (1985) · Cited by 14,701
The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations
Day, G. S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800404 · Cited by 6,510
Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/s0007-6813(05)80064-3 · Cited by 6,455
Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance
Ponter, M. E. (1998) · Cited by 5,801
Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-4486 · Cited by 4,378
The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign
Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (2011) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 3,023
Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1
Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993) · doi:10.21236/ada263403 · Cited by 1,664
(1990) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(90)90072-c · Cited by 1,052
Miya, E. (1985) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/1012443.1012444 · Cited by 1,052
The Capability Maturity Model for Software
(2011) · Software Process Improvement · doi:10.1109/9781118156667.ch2 · Cited by 791
Cited by
Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014 · Cited by 1,545
A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models
Estampe, D., Lamouri, S., Paris, J.-L., & Brahim-Djelloul, S. (2013) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.024 · Cited by 323
Supply chain evolution – theory, concepts and science
MacCarthy, B. L., Blome, C., Olhager, J., Srai, J. S., & Zhao, X. (2016) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-02-2016-0080 · Cited by 260
How Organisations Leverage Big Data: A Maturity Model
Comuzzi, M., & Patel, A. (2016) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-12-2015-0495 · Cited by 191
Stoeva, S., Van Gompel, R., Van den Bossche, L., Rogge, E., Slavova, P., Grivins, M., & Mileiko, I. (2024) · Agricultural and Food Economics · doi:10.1186/s40100-024-00344-4 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Lockamy, A., & McCormack, K.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 272-278
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169070859
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 13.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13598540410550019
- The paper
- Lockamy, A., & McCormack, K. (2004). The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410550019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
