The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks
Abstract
Ad hoc networks are characterized by multihop wireless connectivity, frequently changing network topology and the need for efficient dynamic routing protocols. We compare the performance of two prominent on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks: dynamic source routing (DSR) and ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing (AODV). A detailed simulation model with MAC and physical layer models is used to study interlayer interactions and their performance implications. We demonstrate that even though DSR and AODV share similar on-demand behavior, the differences in the protocol mechanics can lead to significant performance differentials. The performance differentials are analyzed using varying network load, mobility, and network size. Based on the observations, we make recommendations about how the performance of either protocol can be improved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing
Perkins, C. E., & Royer, E. M. (1999) · Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications · doi:10.1109/mcsa.1999.749281 · Cited by 10,313
Self-citationDynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks
Johnson, D. B., & Maltz, D. A. (2007) · The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-0-585-29603-6_5 · Cited by 8,518
A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols
Broch, J., Maltz, D. A., Johnson, D. B., Hu, Y.-C., & Jetcheva, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking · doi:10.1145/288235.288256 · Cited by 4,673
Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications
Piscataway, N. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,999
Bharghavan, V., Demers, A. J., Shenker, S. J., & Zhang, L. (1994) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/190809.190334 · Cited by 1,771
Tobagi, F., & Kleinrock, L. (1975) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1975.1092767 · Cited by 1,578
Analysis of TCP performance over mobile ad hoc networks
Holland, G., & Vaidya, N. (1999) · Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking · doi:10.1145/313451.313540 · Cited by 706
Development of WaveLAN®, an ISM Band Wireless LAN
Tuch, B. (1993) · AT&T Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1993.tb00548.x · Cited by 212
Cited by
Mobile ad hoc networking: imperatives and challenges
Chlamtac, I., Conti, M., & Liu, J. J.-N. (2003) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/s1570-8705(03)00013-1 · Cited by 1,349
Mitigating congestion in wireless sensor networks
Hull, B., Jamieson, K., & Balakrishnan, H. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems · doi:10.1145/1031495.1031512 · Cited by 648
Cloud robotics: architecture, challenges and applications
Hu, G., Tay, W., & Wen, Y. (2012) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2012.6201212 · Cited by 488
Bai, F., Sadagopan, N., & Helmy, A. (2003) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/s1570-8705(03)00040-4 · Cited by 462
Comparative Examination on Architecture and Protocol of Industrial Wireless Sensor Network Standards
Wang, Q., & Jiang, J. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2548360 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Perkins, C. E., Royer, E. M., Das, S. R., & Marina, M. K.
- Venue
- IEEE Personal Communications
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-28
- ISSN
- 1070-9916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161457646
- Cited by
- 1,491
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 132.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/98.904895
- The paper
- Perkins, C. E., Royer, E. M., Das, S. R., & Marina, M. K. (2001). Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks. IEEE Personal Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/98.904895
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
