Cited by 313Indoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesGNSS positioning and interferenceIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Robustness, Security and Privacy in Location-Based Services for Future IoT: A Survey

Open access
Chen, Liang, Thombre, Sarang, Jarvinen, Kimmo, Lohan, Elena Simona, Alen-Savikko, Anette, Leppakoski, Helena, Bhuiyan, M. Zahidul H., Bu-Pasha, Shakila +6 more·2017·IEEE Access

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) connects sensing devices to the Internet for the purpose of exchanging information. Location information is one of the most crucial pieces of information required to achieve intelligent and context-aware IoT systems. Recently, positioning and localization functions have been realized in a large amount of IoT systems. However, security and privacy threats related to positioning in IoT have not been sufficiently addressed so far. In this paper, we survey solutions for improving the robustness, security, and privacy of location-based services in IoT systems. First, we provide an in-depth evaluation of the threats and solutions related to both global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and non-GNSS-based solutions. Second, we describe certain cryptographic solutions for security and privacy of positioning and location-based services in IoT. Finally, we discuss the state-of-the-art of policy regulations regarding security of positioning solutions and legal instruments to location data privacy in detail. This survey paper addresses a broad range of security and privacy aspects in IoT-based positioning and localization from both technical and legal points of view and aims to give insight and recommendations for future IoT systems providing more robust, secure, and privacy-preserving location-based services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2017.2695525

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional AI/ML-based localization systems suffer from lack of robustness and privacy leakage due to centralized processing.

    “Traditional AI/ML-based localization systems often suffer from the lack of robustness due to the dynamics of mobile environments and privacy leakage bottlenecks caused by the centralized data processing architecture for object localization [87].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, L., Thombre, S., Jarvinen, K., Lohan, E. S., Alen-Savikko, A., Leppakoski, H., Bhuiyan, M. Z. H., Bu-Pasha, S., Ferrara, G. N., Honkala, S., Lindqvist, J., Ruotsalainen, L., Korpisaari, P., & Kuusniemi, H.
Affiliations
  • Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Tampere University of Technology (FI)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2017
Volume
5
Pages
8956-8977
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605943641
Cited by
313
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 8
FWCI
15.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland (no. 303576)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
Internet of Things, location-based services, positioning, localization, GNSS, privacy, security (computing), location privacy, legal regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review