The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Augmented Reality Smart Glasses in the Smart Factory: Product Evaluation Guidelines and Review of Available Products
Open accessAbstract
Augmented reality smart glasses (ARSG) are increasingly popular and have been identified as a vital technology supporting shop-floor operators in the smart factories of the future. By improving our knowledge of how to efficiently evaluate and select the ARSG for the shop-floor context, this paper aims to facilitate and accelerate the adoption of the ARSG by the manufacturing industry. The market for ARSG has exploded in recent years, and the large variety of products to select from makes it not only difficult but also time consuming to identify the best alternative. To address this problem, this paper presents an efficient step-by-step process for evaluating the ARSG, including concrete guidelines as to what parameters to consider and their recommended minimum values. Using the suggested evaluation process, manufacturing companies can quickly make optimal decisions about what products to implement on their shop floors. This paper demonstrates the evaluation process in practice, presenting a comprehensive review of currently available products along with a recommended best buy. This paper also identifies and discusses topics meriting research attention to ensure that the ARSG are successfully implemented on the industrial shop floor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Azuma, R. T. (1997) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355 · Cited by 10,121
Five steps to conducting a systematic review
Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/014107680309600304 · Cited by 1,873
Fundamentals of Wearable Computers and Augmented Reality
(2015) · doi:10.1201/b18703 · Cited by 437
Cited by
Digital twin shop-floor: a new shop-floor paradigm towards smart manufacturing
Tao, F., & Zhang, M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2756069 · Cited by 1,397
A survey of industrial augmented reality
de Souza Cardoso, L. F., Mariano, F. C. M. Q., & Zorzal, E. R. (2020) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.106159 · Cited by 322
Blanco-Novoa, O., Fernandez-Carames, T. M., Fraga-Lamas, P., & Vilar-Montesinos, M. A. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2802699 · Cited by 183
Seeing the Bigger Picture? Ramping up Production with the Use of Augmented Reality
Wuttke, D., Upadhyay, A., Siemsen, E., & Wuttke-Linnemann, A. (2022) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2021.1070 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Syberfeldt, A., Danielsson, O., & Gustavsson, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 9118-9130
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2613345949
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Augmented Reality Smart Glasses in the Smart Factory: Product Evaluation Guidelines and Review of Available Products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2017.2703952
- The paper
- Syberfeldt, A., Danielsson, O., & Gustavsson, P. (2017). Augmented Reality Smart Glasses in the Smart Factory: Product Evaluation Guidelines and Review of Available Products. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2703952
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
