System Design Perspective for Human-Level Agents Using Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) has distinguished itself as a prominent learning method to augment the efficacy of autonomous systems. Recent advances in deep learning studies have complemented existing RL methods and led to a crucial breakthrough in the effort of applying RL to automation and robotics. Artificial agents based on deep RL can take selective and intelligent actions comparable with those of a human to maximize the feedback reward from the interactive environment. In this paper, we survey recent developments in the literature regarding deep RL methods for building human-level agents. As a result, prominent studies that involve modeling every aspect of a human-level agent will be examined. We also provide an overview of constructing a framework for prospective autonomous systems. Moreover, various toolkits and frameworks are suggested to facilitate the development of deep RL methods. Finally, we open a discussion that potentially raises a range of future research directions in deep RL.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The performance of a DQLN-based controlled system is significantly influenced by its essential components, namely, state, action, and reward.
“The performance of a DQLN-based controlled system is significantly influenced by its essential components, namely, state, action, and reward.”
From Deep reinforcement learning-based adaptive fuzzy control for electro-hydraulic servo system (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
The design of state, action, and reward plays a critical role in determining the effectiveness of the DQLN-based controlled system.
“This means that the design of these three elements plays a critical role in determining the effectiveness of the system [11, 12].”
From Deep reinforcement learning-based adaptive fuzzy control for electro-hydraulic servo system (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 100
- Authors
- Nguyen, N. D., Nguyen, T., & Nahavandi, S.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 27091-27102
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2768919152
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8
- FWCI
- 7.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- deep reinforcement learning, autonomous systems, robotics, system design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review