The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When Intrusion Detection Meets Blockchain Technology: A Review
Open accessAbstract
With the purpose of identifying cyber threats and possible incidents, intrusion detection systems (IDSs) are widely deployed in various computer networks. In order to enhance the detection capability of a single IDS, collaborative intrusion detection networks (or collaborative IDSs) have been developed, which allow IDS nodes to exchange data with each other. However, data and trust management still remain two challenges for current detection architectures, which may degrade the effectiveness of such detection systems. In recent years, blockchain technology has shown its adaptability in many fields, such as supply chain management, international payment, interbanking, and so on. As blockchain can protect the integrity of data storage and ensure process transparency, it has a potential to be applied to intrusion detection domain. Motivated by this, this paper provides a review regarding the intersection of IDSs and blockchains. In particular, we introduce the background of intrusion detection and blockchain, discuss the applicability of blockchain to intrusion detection, and identify open challenges in this direction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Douceur, J. R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24 · Cited by 4,419
Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review
Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163477 · Cited by 2,317
Protocols for Public Key Cryptosystems
Merkle, R. C. (1980) · 1980 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.1980.10006 · Cited by 1,418
Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
Scarfone, K. A., & Mell, P. M. (2007) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-94 · Cited by 1,279
Blockchain technology in healthcare: The revolution starts here
Mettler, M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom) · doi:10.1109/healthcom.2016.7749510 · Cited by 1,237
Cited by
Dutta, P., Choi, T.-M., Somani, S., & Butala, R. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067 · Cited by 1,545
Pournader, M., Shi, Y., Seuring, S., & Koh, S. C. L. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1650976 · Cited by 854
Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Vecchio, P. D., Oropallo, E., & Secundo, G. (2022) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103508 · Cited by 820
Blockchain Technologies for the Internet of Things: Research Issues and Challenges
Ferrag, M. A., Derdour, M., Mukherjee, M., Derhab, A., Maglaras, L., & Janicke, H. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2882794 · Cited by 668
Differential Privacy Techniques for Cyber Physical Systems: A Survey
Hassan, M. U., Rehmani, M. H., & Chen, J. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2944748 · Cited by 564
Metadata
- Authors
- Meng, W., Tischhauser, E. W., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., & Han, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 10179-10188
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792850657
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 46.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When Intrusion Detection Meets Blockchain Technology: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2018.2799854
- The paper
- Meng, W., Tischhauser, E. W., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., & Han, J. (2018). When Intrusion Detection Meets Blockchain Technology: A Review. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2799854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
