The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain
Abstract
Abstract Trust, traceability, and transparency emerge as critical factors in designing circular blockchain platforms in supply chains. To bridge the three circular supply chain reverse processes (i.e., recycle, redistribute, remanufacture) and the three factors affecting blockchain technologies (i.e., trust, traceability, transparency), this paper proposes the integrated Triple Retry framework for designing circular blockchain platforms. A circular blockchain platform was designed in a supply chain, including manufacturer, reverse logistics service provider, selection center, recycling center, and landfill. The results highlight blockchain's role as a technological capability for improving control in the movement of wastes and product return management activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things
Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2566339 · Cited by 4,552
Douceur, J. R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24 · Cited by 4,419
Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 · Cited by 4,118
Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., & Patsakis, C. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006 · Cited by 2,557
1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives
Kshetri, N. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005 · Cited by 2,149
Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis
Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003 · Cited by 2,131
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086 · Cited by 2,055
Newbert, S. L. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.573 · Cited by 2,053
Cited by
Hosseini Dehshiri, S. J., & Amiri, M. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121123 · Cited by 81
Panza, L., Bruno, G., & Lombardi, F. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151612552 · Cited by 72
Modelling procurement problems in the environment of blockchain technology
Yadav, S., & Prakash Singh, S. (2022) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108546 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Vecchio, P. D., Oropallo, E., & Secundo, G.
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 103508
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3185716662
- Cited by
- 820
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 95.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.im.2021.103508
- The paper
- Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Vecchio, P. D., Oropallo, E., & Secundo, G. (2022). Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
