Cited by 89EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMuscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Implementation of a Brain-Computer Interface on a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton

Open access
Wang, Can, Wu, Xinyu, Wang, Zhouyang, Ma, Yue·2018·IEEE Access

Abstract

In this paper, we propose to use brain-computer interface (BCI) to control a lower-limb exoskeleton. The exoskeleton follows the wearer's motion intention through decoding of electroencephalography (EEG) signals and multi-modal cognition. Motion patterns as standing up, sitting down, and walking forward can be performed. We implemented two types of BCIs, one based on steady-state visual evoked potentials, which used canonical correlation analysis to extract the frequency the subject focused on. The other BCI is based on motor imagery, where the common spatial patterns method was employed to extract the features from the EEG signal. Then, the features were classified by support vector machine to recognize the intention of the subject. We invited four healthy subjects to participate in the experiments, including off-line and online. The off-line experiments trained the classifier and then were used online to test the performance of the BCI controlled exoskeleton system. The results showed high accuracy rate in motion intention classification tasks for both BCIs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2018.2853628

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, C., Wu, X., Wang, Z., & Ma, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2018
Volume
6
Pages
38524-38534
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2861373854
Cited by
89
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB1302303)
  • National Natural Science Foundation–Shenzhen Joint Research Program (U1613219)
  • State Joint Engineering Laboratory for Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing through the National Development and Reform Commission (2015581)
  • Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory for Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing through the Shenzhen Municipal Development and Reform Commission (20141722)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
brain-computer interface, lower limb exoskeleton, EEG decoding, steady-state visual evoked potentials, motor imagery, common spatial pattern, support vector machine, assistive robotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review