The DOI matches its Crossref record.
5G Wireless Network Slicing for eMBB, URLLC, and mMTC: A Communication-Theoretic View
Open accessAbstract
The grand objective of 5G wireless technology is to support three generic services with vastly heterogeneous requirements: enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB), massive machine-type communications (mMTCs), and ultra-reliable low-latency communications (URLLCs). Service heterogeneity can be accommodated by network slicing, through which each service is allocated resources to provide performance guarantees and isolation from the other services. Slicing of the radio access network (RAN) is typically done by means of orthogonal resource allocation among the services. This paper studies the potential advantages of allowing for non-orthogonal sharing of RAN resources in uplink communications from a set of eMBB, mMTC, and URLLC devices to a common base station. The approach is referred to as heterogeneous nonorthogonal multiple access (H-NOMA), in contrast to the conventional NOMA techniques that involve users with homogeneous requirements and hence can be investigated through a standard multiple access channel. The study devises a communication-theoretic model that accounts for the heterogeneous requirements and characteristics of the three services. The concept of reliability diversity is introduced as a design principle that leverages the different reliability requirements across the services in order to ensure performance guarantees with non-orthogonal RAN slicing. This paper reveals that H-NOMA can lead, in some regimes, to significant gains in terms of performance tradeoffs among the three generic services as compared to orthogonal slicing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable AI meta-surfaces: an idea whose time has come
Renzo, M. D., Debbah, M., Phan-Huy, D.-T., Zappone, A., Alouini, M.-S., Yuen, C., Sciancalepore, V., Alexandropoulos, G. C., Hoydis, J., Gacanin, H., et al. (2019) · EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking · doi:10.1186/s13638-019-1438-9 · Cited by 1,717
Survey on 6G Frontiers: Trends, Applications, Requirements, Technologies and Future Research
Alwis, C. D., Kalla, A., Pham, Q.-V., Kumar, P., Dev, K., Hwang, W.-J., & Liyanage, M. (2021) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2021.3071496 · Cited by 788
Survey on Network Slicing for Internet of Things Realization in 5G Networks
Wijethilaka, S., & Liyanage, M. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3067807 · Cited by 451
She, C., Sun, C., Gu, Z., Li, Y., Yang, C., Poor, H. V., & Vucetic, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3053601 · Cited by 405
On 5G-V2X Use Cases and Enabling Technologies: A Comprehensive Survey
Alalewi, A., Dayoub, I., & Cherkaoui, S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3100472 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Popovski, P., Trillingsgaard, K. F., Simeone, O., & Durisi, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 55765-55779
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2797977216
- Cited by
- 979
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 5G Wireless Network Slicing for eMBB, URLLC, and mMTC: A Communication-Theoretic View. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2018.2872781
- The paper
- Popovski, P., Trillingsgaard, K. F., Simeone, O., & Durisi, G. (2018). 5G Wireless Network Slicing for eMBB, URLLC, and mMTC: A Communication-Theoretic View. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2872781
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.