Cited by 126Cryptography and Data SecurityBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityQuantum Information and Cryptography

A New Lattice-Based Signature Scheme in Post-Quantum Blockchain Network

Open access
Li, Chao-Yang, Chen, Xiu-Bo, Chen, Yu-Ling, Hou, Yan-Yan, Li, Jian·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

Blockchain technology has gained significant prominence in recent years due to its public, distributed, and decentration characteristics, which was widely applied in all walks of life requiring distributed trustless consensus. However, the most cryptographic protocols used in the current blockchain networks are susceptible to the quantum attack with rapid development of a sufficiently large quantum computer. In this paper, we first give an overview of the vulnerabilities of the modern blockchain networks to a quantum adversary and some potential post-quantum mitigation methods. Then, a new lattice-based signature scheme has been proposed, which can be used to secure the blockchain network over existing classical channels. Meanwhile, the public and private keys are generated by the Bonsai Trees technology withRandBasisalgorithm from the root keys, which not only ensure the randomness, but also construct the lightweight nondeterministic wallets. Then, the proposed scheme can be proved secure in random oracle model, and it is also more efficient than similar literatures. In addition, we also give the detailed description of the post-quantum blockchain transaction. Furthermore, this work can help to enrich the research on the future post-quantum blockchain (PQB).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2018.2886554

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Li et al. implemented a lattice-based solution where public and private keys are generated with Bonsai Trees technology, and used algorithms that ensure randomness and construct lightweight nondeterministic wallets.

    “Li et al. implemented a lattice-based solution where public and private keys are generated with Bonsai Trees technology, and used algorithms that ensure randomness and construct lightweight nondeterministic wallets93.”

    From Quantum-resistance in blockchain networks (2023) · cites this paper as [93]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 126

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. M. A. Nielsen and I. Chuang, ''Quantum computation and quantum infor- mation,'' pp. 558-559, 2002.

Authors
Li, C.-Y., Chen, X.-B., Chen, Y.-L., Hou, Y.-Y., & Li, J.
Affiliations
  • Guizhou University (CN)
  • Zaozhuang University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
2026-2033
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903928648
Cited by
126
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1636106, 61671087, 61170272)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (4182006)
  • Major Science and Technology Support Program of Guizhou Province (20183001)
  • Open Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Public Big Data (2018BDKFJJ016, 2018BDKFJJ018)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
lattice-based cryptography, digital signatures, bonsai, key generation, random oracle model security, blockchain transactions, post-quantum cryptography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review