The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phishing Email Detection Using Improved RCNN Model With Multilevel Vectors and Attention Mechanism
Open accessAbstract
The phishing email is one of the significant threats in the world today and has caused tremendous financial losses. Although the methods of confrontation are continually being updated, the results of those methods are not very satisfactory at present. Moreover, phishing emails are growing at an alarming rate in recent years. Therefore, more effective phishing detection technology is needed to curb the threat of phishing emails. In this paper, we first analyzed the email structure. Then, based on an improved recurrent convolutional neural networks (RCNN) model with multilevel vectors and attention mechanism, we proposed a new phishing email detection model named THEMIS, which is used to model emails at the email header, the email body, the character level, and the word level simultaneously. To evaluate the effectiveness of THEMIS, we use an unbalanced dataset that has realistic ratios of phishing and legitimate emails. The experimental results show that the overall accuracy of THEMIS reaches 99.848%. Meanwhile, the false positive rate (FPR) is 0.043%. High accuracy and low FPR ensure that the filter can identify phishing emails with high probability and filter out legitimate emails as little as possible. This promising result is superior to the existing detection methods and verifies the effectiveness of THEMIS in detecting phishing emails.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation
Luong, T., Pham, H., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1166 · Cited by 8,382
Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attention
Xu, K., Ba, J., Kiros, R., Cho, K., Courville, A., Salakhutdinov, R., Zemel, R., & Bengio, Y. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03044 · Cited by 8,248
Cited by
The Role of Machine Learning in Cybersecurity
Apruzzese, G., Laskov, P., Montes de Oca, E., Mallouli, W., Brdalo Rapa, L., Grammatopoulos, A. V., & Di Franco, F. (2023) · Digital Threats: Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3545574 · Cited by 279
A Study on the Psychology of Social Engineering-Based Cyberattacks and Existing Countermeasures
Siddiqi, M. A., Pak, W., & Siddiqi, M. A. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12126042 · Cited by 118
Analysis and prevention of AI-based phishing email attacks
Eze, C. S., & Shamir, L. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13101839 · Cited by 47
Double layer detection of internal threat in enterprise systems based on deep learning
He, D., Lv, X., Xu, X., Chan, S., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3372771 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, Y., Zhang, C., Huang, C., Liu, L., & Yang, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 56329-56340
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2944103016
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phishing Email Detection Using Improved RCNN Model With Multilevel Vectors and Attention Mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2913705
- The paper
- Fang, Y., Zhang, C., Huang, C., Liu, L., & Yang, Y. (2019). Phishing Email Detection Using Improved RCNN Model With Multilevel Vectors and Attention Mechanism. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2913705
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.