Cited by 27Stock Market Forecasting MethodsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesForecasting Techniques and Applications

On the Economic Significance of Stock Market Prediction and the No Free Lunch Theorem

Open access
Bousono-Calzon, Carlos, Bustarviejo-Munoz, Josue, Aceituno-Aceituno, Pedro, Escudero-Garzas, Jose Joaquin·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

Forecasting of stock market returns is a challenging research activity that is now expanding with the availability of new data sources, markets, financial instruments, and algorithms. At its core, the predictability of prices still raises important questions. Here, we discuss the economic significance of the prediction accuracy. To develop this question, we collect the daily series prices of almost half of the publicly traded companies around the world over a period of ten years and formulate some trading strategies based on their prediction. Proper visualization of these data together with the use of the No Free Lunch theoretical framework gives some unexpected results that show how the a priori less accurate algorithms and inefficient strategies can offer better results than the a priori best alternatives in some particular subsets of data that have a clear interpretation in terms of economic sectors and regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2921092

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]45. Apple. (Feb. 11, 2005). Apple Announces Two-for-One Stock Split. Apple Press Release, Cupertino, CA, USA, Apple Newsroom, [Online]. Available: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2005/02/11Apple- Announces-Two-for-One-Stock-Split/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bousono-Calzon, C., Bustarviejo-Munoz, J., Aceituno-Aceituno, P., & Escudero-Garzas, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
75177-75188
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948842003
Cited by
27
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (2013/00199/002)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Keywords
stock market prediction, no free lunch theorem, stock return predictability, trading strategies, prediction accuracy, daily stock prices, listed companies, economic sectors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review