Cited by 65Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsControl Systems and Identification

An Improved Coulomb Counting Approach Based on Numerical Iteration for SOC Estimation With Real-Time Error Correction Ability

Open access
He, Liangzong, Guo, Dong·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

The coulomb counting (CC) approach is widely used in SOC estimation due to its simplicity and low calculation cost. However, in practical applications, the lack of error correction ability limits its accuracy due to the measured noise in the practical occasion. To address the issue, an improved CC (ICC) approach based on numerical iteration is proposed in this paper. In the proposed approach, a battery model based on a 2nd-order, RC circuit is first formulated to determine the SOC-OCV curve, R-OCV curve, and inner parameters. In the model, the slow dynamic and fast dynamic voltages are described separately, and are utilized for battery state assessment. Then, the SOC will be estimated by the CC approach at the unsteady state but through a numerical iteration approach at steady state. Consequently, the accumulative SOC error from the CC approach will be corrected when the numerical iteration approach is applied. Furthermore, a compensation coefficient is employed into the CC approach to reduce the error accumulation rate. Hence, the proposed ICC approach could make full use of the advantages of conventional CC in low computational demand and numerical iteration approach in error correction. Finally, an experiment platform was built, where two kinds of current sensors with different measuring accuracy were employed to simulate the measured current with and without noise, respectively. The experimental results suggest that the accumulative SOC error can be corrected in real-time and the SOC error is reduced to 1%. The error accumulation rate of SOC is effectively reduced compared with traditional CC approach, simultaneously, more than 90% of the calculation time can be reduced compared with EKF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2921105

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coulomb counting is susceptible to sensor inaccuracies and cumulative errors caused by battery aging.

    “Coulomb counting is susceptible to sensor inaccuracies and cumulative errors caused by battery aging[5]”

    From Advancements in the estimation of the state of charge of lithium-ion battery: a comprehensive review of traditional and deep learning approaches (2025) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Introduction says Coulomb counting can accumulate error because of measurement noise and its lack of error correction, and the Data Collection section demonstrates increasing error with noisy current measurements. The Off-line Parameters Identification section acknowledges that aging affects battery performance but calls its influence negligible in these tests; it does not attribute the cumulative Coulomb-counting errors to aging. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
He, L., & Guo, D.
Affiliations
Xiamen University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
74274-74282
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948676882
Cited by
65
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fujian Province Outstanding Youth Fund (2018J06016)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61671400)
  • Xiamen University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
Coulomb counting, state of charge estimation, error correction, iterative computation, compensation coefficient, low computational cost

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review