Cited by 157Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and AnalysisHuman Pose and Action Recognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Human Activity Recognition Using Multimodal Body Sensing Data

Open access

Abstract

Human activity recognition from multimodal body sensor data has proven to be an effective approach for the care of elderly or physically impaired people in a smart healthcare environment. However, traditional machine learning techniques are mostly focused on a single sensing modality, which is not practical for robust healthcare applications. Therefore, recently increasing attention is being given by the researchers on the development of robust machine learning techniques that can exploit multimodal body sensor data and provide important decision making in Smart healthcare. In this paper, we propose an effective multi-sensors-based framework for human activity recognition using a hybrid deep learning model, which combines the simple recurrent units (SRUs) with the gated recurrent units (GRUs) of neural networks. We use the deep SRUs to process the sequences of multimodal input data by using the capability of their internal memory states. Moreover, we use the deep GRUs to store and learn how much of the past information is passed to the future state for solving fluctuations or instability in accuracy and vanishing gradient problems. The system has been compared against the conventional approaches on a publicly available standard dataset. The experimental results show that the proposed approach outperforms the available state-of-the-art methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2927134

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–157 of 157

Metadata

Authors
Gumaei, A., Hassan, M. M., Alelaiwi, A., & Alsalman, H.
Affiliations
King Saud University (SA)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
99152-99160
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2966450377
Cited by
157
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University (RGP-318)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
human activity recognition, hybrid deep learning model, simple recurrent unit, gated recurrent unit, smart healthcare, elderly care, gradient vanishing, sequence data processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review