Cited by 30Power System Optimization and StabilityOptimal Power Flow DistributionElectric Power System Optimization

Preventing Cascading Failure Through Fuzzy Co-Operative Control Mechanism Using V2G

Open access
Adnan, Muhammad, Ali, Mansoor, Basalamah, Anas, Tariq, Muhammad·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

The previously proposed algorithms for preventing cascading failures, which lead to a blackout event, involve specific load shedding schemes, which introduce incurring losses in the power system network. In this paper, a cooperative control based algorithm using a vehicle to grid (V2G) technology based on a fuzzy logic approach is proposed to prevent cascading failures without loss incurrence. The algorithm is implemented on a standard IEEE-30 bus system, and it uses mathematical combinations heuristically to identify the critical nodes through the use of a self-propagation graph to dispatch the optimum power from V2G. For the enhancement of computational speed, a network operator considers only those vulnerable nodes, which are identified by a self-propagating graph. Through this, a network operator can easily detect critical nodes by rooting straight to the vulnerable transmission lines in the IEEE-30 bus network. The probabilistic modeling in this paper is performed in such a way that network operators will mitigate cascading failures events (CFEs) after the occurrence of (N -1) and (N -1-1) contingencies/blackout events without performing load shedding. The detailed experimental analysis provides better visualization of the impact of CFEs on power grids to the power network operators and therefore significantly improves the accuracy of taking necessary actions to compensate these CFEs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2944848

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 318-326, May 2005.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adnan, M., Ali, M., Basalamah, A., & Tariq, M.
Affiliations
  • National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (PK)
  • Umm al-Qura University (SA)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
142607-142622
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2978994931
Cited by
30
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
Keywords
cascading failures, vehicle-to-grid, fuzzy logic control, cooperative control, critical node identification, blackout prevention, N-1 contingency, IEEE 30-bus system, power system protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review