Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two-Stage Topic Extraction Model for Bibliometric Data Analysis Based on Word Embeddings and Clustering

Open access
Onan, Aytug·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

Topic extraction is an essential task in bibliometric data analysis, data mining and knowledge discovery, which seeks to identify significant topics from text collections. The conventional topic extraction schemes require human intervention and involve also comprehensive pre-processing tasks to represent text collections in an appropriate way. In this paper, we present a two-stage framework for topic extraction from scientific literature. The presented scheme employs a two-staged procedure, where word embedding schemes have been utilized in conjunction with cluster analysis. To extract significant topics from text collections, we propose an improved word embedding scheme, which incorporates word vectors obtained by word2vec, POS2vec, word-position2vec and LDA2vec schemes. In the clustering phase, an improved clustering ensemble framework, which incorporates conventional clustering methods (i.e., k-means, k-modes, k-means++, self-organizing maps and DIANA algorithm) by means of the iterative voting consensus, has been presented. In the empirical analysis, we analyze a corpus containing 160,424 abstracts of articles from various disciplines, including agricultural engineering, economics, engineering and computer science. In the experimental analysis, performance of the proposed scheme has been compared to conventional baseline clustering methods (such as, k-means, k-modes, and k-means++), LDA-based topic modelling and conventional word embedding schemes. The empirical analysis reveals that ensemble word embedding scheme yields better predictive performance compared to the baseline word vectors for topic extraction. Ensemble clustering framework outperforms the baseline clustering methods. The results obtained by the proposed framework show an improvement in Jaccard coefficient, Folkes & Mallows measure and F1 score.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2945911

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Onan, A.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
145614-145633
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2979750067
Cited by
257
References
46
FWCI
14.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two-Stage Topic Extraction Model for Bibliometric Data Analysis Based on Word Embeddings and Clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2945911
The paper
Onan, A. (2019). Two-Stage Topic Extraction Model for Bibliometric Data Analysis Based on Word Embeddings and Clustering. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2945911

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.