Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 51Advanced Malware Detection TechniquesSpam and Phishing DetectionSoftware Engineering Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Identifying Malicious Software Using Deep Residual Long-Short Term Memory

Open access
Alotaibi, Aziz·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

The use of smartphone applications based on the Android OS platform is rapidly growing among smartphone users. However, malicious apps for Android are being developed to perform attacks, such as destroying operating systems, stealing confidential data, gathering personal information, and hijacking or encrypting sensitive data. Several malware detection systems based on machine learning have been developed and deployed to extract a variety of features to prevent such attacks. However, new efficient detection methods are needed to extract complex features and hidden structures from malicious apps to detect malware. This paper proposes a novel framework, namely, MalResLSTM, based on deep residual long short-term memory to identify and classify malware variants. The framework imposes a set of constraints on the deep learning architecture to capture dependencies between the extracted features from the Android package kit (APK) file. These feature sets are mapped to a vector space to process the input sequence using a sequence model based on the residual LSTM network. To evaluate the performance of the proposed framework, several experiments are conducted on the Drebin dataset, which contains 129,013 applications. The results demonstrate that MalResLSTM can achieve a 99.32% detection accuracy and outperforms previous algorithms. An extensive experimental analysis was conducted, which included machine-learning-based algorithms and a variety of deep learning-based algorithms, to evaluate the efficiency and robustness of our proposed framework.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2951751

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 51

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.14722/ndss.2014.23247 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.future.2017.07.016 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s11042-017-5104-0 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.06.014 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906934 · DOI
  6. karbab, 2018, MalDozer: Automatic framework for Android malware detection using deep learning, Journal of digital investigation, 24, 48s, 10.1016/j.diin.2018.01.007 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cose.2013.02.002 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/spe.2420 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/CLOUD.2018.00028 · DOI
  10. 10.3233/JIFS-169424 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TII.2017.2789219 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TST.2016.7399288 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10207-016-0330-4 · DOI
  14. chavan, 2019, A comparative analysis of Android malware, arXiv 1904 00735
  15. gantz, 2012, FISMA and the Risk Management Framework The New Practice of Federal Cyber Security
  16. 10.1109/TrustCom.2013.25 · DOI
  17. hardy, 2016, DL4MD: A deep learning framework for intelligent malware detection, Proc Int Conf Data Mining (DMIN) Steering Committee World Congr Comput Sci, 1
  18. 10.1186/s13673-018-0125-x · DOI
  19. 10.1109/TDSC.2016.2536605 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s10207-015-0297-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TIFS.2016.2646641 · DOI
  22. 10.1186/s40064-016-1861-x · DOI
  23. 10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0099 · DOI
  24. 10.1145/2480362.2480701 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/SP.2012.16 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cose.2019.02.007 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/MALWARE.2016.7888730 · DOI
  28. bhattacharya, 2017, DMDAM: Data mining based detection of Android malware, Proc Int Conf Commun Comput Intell, 187
  29. 10.1109/LATINCOM.2016.7811605 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2891588 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2913439 · DOI
  32. ye, 2017, A survey on malware detection using data mining techniques, ACM Comput Surv, 50
  33. 10.1109/TC.2010.130 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/SECON.2016.7506685 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.cose.2016.11.011 · DOI
  36. clement, 2018, Development of Android Malware Worldwide 2011–2018
  37. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2853121 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.cose.2018.11.001 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.diin.2019.01.017 · DOI
  40. chakkaravarthy, 2019, A survey on malware analysis and mitigation techniques, Comput Sci Rev, 32, 1, 10.1016/j.cosrev.2019.01.002 · DOI
  41. feizollah, 2015, A review on feature selection in mobile malware detection, Investigative Radiology, 13, 22
  42. 10.1109/AINA.2013.88 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.future.2019.03.007 · DOI
  44. 10.1145/3029806.3029823 · DOI
  45. yu, 2014, Towards neural network based malware detection on Android mobile devices, Cybersecurity Systems for Human Cognition Augmentation, 99, 10.1007/978-3-319-10374-7_7 · DOI
  46. 10.1145/2660267.2660359 · DOI
  47. 10.1109/NTMS.2016.7792435 · DOI
  48. ioffe, 2015, Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift, arXiv 1502 03167
  49. 10.1109/TIFS.2018.2866319 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Alotaibi, A.
Affiliations
Taif University (SA)
Corresponding author
Alotaibi, Aziz
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
163128-163137
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2986820410
Cited by
51
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
Keywords
Android malware detection, long short-term memory, mobile application security, malware classification, Drebin dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying Malicious Software Using Deep Residual Long-Short Term Memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2951751
The paper
Alotaibi, A. (2019). Identifying Malicious Software Using Deep Residual Long-Short Term Memory. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2951751

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.