The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Identifying Malicious Software Using Deep Residual Long-Short Term Memory
Open accessAbstract
The use of smartphone applications based on the Android OS platform is rapidly growing among smartphone users. However, malicious apps for Android are being developed to perform attacks, such as destroying operating systems, stealing confidential data, gathering personal information, and hijacking or encrypting sensitive data. Several malware detection systems based on machine learning have been developed and deployed to extract a variety of features to prevent such attacks. However, new efficient detection methods are needed to extract complex features and hidden structures from malicious apps to detect malware. This paper proposes a novel framework, namely, MalResLSTM, based on deep residual long short-term memory to identify and classify malware variants. The framework imposes a set of constraints on the deep learning architecture to capture dependencies between the extracted features from the Android package kit (APK) file. These feature sets are mapped to a vector space to process the input sequence using a sequence model based on the residual LSTM network. To evaluate the performance of the proposed framework, several experiments are conducted on the Drebin dataset, which contains 129,013 applications. The results demonstrate that MalResLSTM can achieve a 99.32% detection accuracy and outperforms previous algorithms. An extensive experimental analysis was conducted, which included machine-learning-based algorithms and a variety of deep learning-based algorithms, to evaluate the efficiency and robustness of our proposed framework.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“LSTM networks face difficulties in effectively training the lower layers due to the vanishing gradient problem.”
From Blockchain-based secure MEC model for VANETs using hybrid networks (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 51
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.14722/ndss.2014.23247 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.future.2017.07.016 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11042-017-5104-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.06.014 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906934 · DOI
- karbab, 2018, MalDozer: Automatic framework for Android malware detection using deep learning, Journal of digital investigation, 24, 48s, 10.1016/j.diin.2018.01.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cose.2013.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/spe.2420 · DOI
- 10.1109/CLOUD.2018.00028 · DOI
- 10.3233/JIFS-169424 · DOI
- 10.1109/TII.2017.2789219 · DOI
- 10.1109/TST.2016.7399288 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10207-016-0330-4 · DOI
- chavan, 2019, A comparative analysis of Android malware, arXiv 1904 00735
- gantz, 2012, FISMA and the Risk Management Framework The New Practice of Federal Cyber Security
- 10.1109/TrustCom.2013.25 · DOI
- hardy, 2016, DL4MD: A deep learning framework for intelligent malware detection, Proc Int Conf Data Mining (DMIN) Steering Committee World Congr Comput Sci, 1
- 10.1186/s13673-018-0125-x · DOI
- 10.1109/TDSC.2016.2536605 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10207-015-0297-6 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIFS.2016.2646641 · DOI
- 10.1186/s40064-016-1861-x · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0099 · DOI
- 10.1145/2480362.2480701 · DOI
- 10.1109/SP.2012.16 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cose.2019.02.007 · DOI
- 10.1109/MALWARE.2016.7888730 · DOI
- bhattacharya, 2017, DMDAM: Data mining based detection of Android malware, Proc Int Conf Commun Comput Intell, 187
- 10.1109/LATINCOM.2016.7811605 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2891588 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2913439 · DOI
- ye, 2017, A survey on malware detection using data mining techniques, ACM Comput Surv, 50
- 10.1109/TC.2010.130 · DOI
- 10.1109/SECON.2016.7506685 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cose.2016.11.011 · DOI
- clement, 2018, Development of Android Malware Worldwide 2011–2018
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2853121 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cose.2018.11.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.diin.2019.01.017 · DOI
- chakkaravarthy, 2019, A survey on malware analysis and mitigation techniques, Comput Sci Rev, 32, 1, 10.1016/j.cosrev.2019.01.002 · DOI
- feizollah, 2015, A review on feature selection in mobile malware detection, Investigative Radiology, 13, 22
- 10.1109/AINA.2013.88 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.future.2019.03.007 · DOI
- 10.1145/3029806.3029823 · DOI
- yu, 2014, Towards neural network based malware detection on Android mobile devices, Cybersecurity Systems for Human Cognition Augmentation, 99, 10.1007/978-3-319-10374-7_7 · DOI
- 10.1145/2660267.2660359 · DOI
- 10.1109/NTMS.2016.7792435 · DOI
- ioffe, 2015, Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift, arXiv 1502 03167
- 10.1109/TIFS.2018.2866319 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Alotaibi, A.
- Affiliations
- Taif University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Alotaibi, Aziz
- ORCID
- Alotaibi, Aziz
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 163128-163137
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2986820410
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- Android malware detection, long short-term memory, mobile application security, malware classification, Drebin dataset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying Malicious Software Using Deep Residual Long-Short Term Memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2951751
- The paper
- Alotaibi, A. (2019). Identifying Malicious Software Using Deep Residual Long-Short Term Memory. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2951751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.