Cited by 140Brain Tumor Detection and ClassificationAI in cancer detectionMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Brain Tumor Detection Based on Multimodal Information Fusion and Convolutional Neural Network

Open access
Li, Ming, Kuang, Lishan, Xu, Shuhua, Sha, Zhanguo·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

Aiming at the problem of low accuracy of traditional brain tumor detection, in this paper, a combination of multimodal information fusion and convolution neural network detection method of brain tumors, we call it a Multi-CNNs. First, this paper uses the extension of the 2D-CNNs to multimodal 3D-CNNs, and can obtain brain lesions under different modal characteristics of three-dimensional space. It can solve the 2D-CNNs raw input requires large neighborhood of faults, at the same time better to extract the modal of the differences between information. Then the real normalization layer is added between the convolution layers and pooling layer to improve the convergence speeds of the network and alleviate the problem of overfitting. In the end, the loss function was improved, and the weighted loss function was used to enhance the feature learning of the lesion area. The experimental results showed that the brain tumor detection method proposed in this paper could effectively locate tumor lesions, and better results were obtained in correlation coefficient, sensitivity, and specificity. Compared with two-dimensional detection network and single mode brain tumor detection methods, the detection accuracy is significantly improved.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2958370

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Q. Li, Z. Gao, and Q. Wang, ''Glioma segmentation with a uni- fied algorithm in multimodal MRI images,'' IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 9543-9553, 2018.
  2. W. Wu, A. Y. C. Chen, and L. Zhao, ''Brain tumor detection and seg- mentation in a CRF framework with pixel-pairwise affinity and super pixel-level features,'' Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 241-253, 2014.
  3. J. I. Rojas, L. Patrucco, and C. Besada, ''Sex-related differences in atro- phy and lesion load in multiple sclerosis patients,'' Neurología, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 389-393., 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Kuang, L., Xu, S., & Sha, Z.
Affiliations
People’s Hospital of Rizhao (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
180134-180146
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998623084
Cited by
140
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
brain tumor detection, multimodal fusion, 3D convolutional neural networks, brain lesion segmentation, weighted loss function, normalization layers, overfitting, tumor localization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review