Flexibility services management under uncertainties for power distribution systems: Stochastic scheduling and predictive real-time dispatch
Open accessAbstract
Over the last years, the role of the distribution system operator (DSO) has largely expanded. This is necessitated by the increased penetration of intermittent energy resources at the distribution level, as well as the new, more complex interactions with the transmission system operator (TSO). As such, to properly manage its system and to have an effective joint cooperation with the TSO, the DSO is required to procure and carefully manage flexibility services from distributed energy resources (DER). This paper introduces a thorough framework on optimal operational planning (day-ahead scheduling) and operational management (real-time dispatch) of active distribution systems under uncertainties, to avoid line congestions and voltage limit violations, and efficiently balance the distribution system. A two-stage stochastic programming model based on weighted scenarios is proposed to optimize the multi-period optimal power flow day-ahead scheduling, i.e., scheduled power flows at the TSO-DSO interface and reserved DER flexibility services. Subsequently, the operational management, realized with a predictive real-time dispatch model based on a constantly updated rolling horizon, aims to efficiently activate the available flexibility services to minimize deviations from the committed schedule. Different sources of flexibility are considered, with their respective response times also taken into account at real-time dispatch. The proposed framework is applied on two distribution systems and investigates the DSO's level of risk exposure while minimizing its total cost (reservation and activation expenses). The results indicate that a less conservative approach at planning stage, despite the potential risk exposure, can lead to significant reduction in total expenses.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The approximation of the power flow equations proposed by Gan and Low [36] is a generalization of the simplified DistFlow equations and allows to model radial three-phase grids taking into account resistive losses, reactive power and voltage sag, enabling a realistic representation of distribution networks.
“The approximation of the power flow equations proposed by Gan and Low [36] is chosen, which is a generalization of the simplified DistFlow equations. It allows to model radial three-phase grids taking into account resistive losses, reactive power and voltage sag, which enable a realistic representation of distribution networks.”
From Congestion mitigation in unbalanced residential networks with OPF-based demand management (2022) · cites this paper as [36]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 65
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- H. Farhangi, ''The path of the smart grid,'' IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 18-28, Jan./Feb. 2010.
- L. Kane and G. W. Ault, ''Evaluation of wind power curtailment in active network management schemes,'' IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 672-679, Mar. 2015.
- P. Siano and D. Sarno, ''Assessing the benefits of residential demand response in a real time distribution energy market,'' Appl. Energy, vol. 161, pp. 533-551, Jan. 2016.
- W. Liu, Q. Wu, F. Wen, and J. Ostergaard, ''Day-ahead congestion man- agement in distribution systems through household demand response and distribution congestion prices,'' IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 2739-2747, Nov. 2014.
- I. I. Avramidis, V. A. Evangelopoulos, P. S. Georgilakis, and N. D. Hatziargyriou, ''Demand side flexibility schemes for facilitating the high penetration of residential distributed energy resources,'' IET Gener., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 4079-4088, Oct. 2018.
- F. Capitanescu and I. Bilibin, ''A tractable two-step MILP-QCP approach to on-line thermal constraint management in large radial active distribution systems,'' Electric Power Syst. Res., vol. 140, pp. 580-587, Nov. 2016.
- A. Vicente-Pastor, J. Nieto-Martin, D. W. Bunn, and A. Laur, ''Evaluation of flexibility markets for Retailer-DSO-TSO coordination,'' IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 2003-2012, May 2019.
- V. A. Evangelopoulos, P. S. Georgilakis, and N. D. Hatziargyriou, ''Opti- mal operation of smart distribution networks: A review of models, methods and future research,'' Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 140, pp. 95-106, Nov. 2016.
- L. N. Ochoa, F. Pilo, A. Keane, P. Cuffe, and G. Pisano, ''Embracing an adaptable, flexible posture: Ensuring that future European distribution networks are ready for more active roles,'' IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 16-28, Sep. 2016.
- H. Gerard, E. I. Rivero Puente, and D. Six, ''Coordination between transmission and distribution system operators in the electricity sector: A conceptual framework,'' Utilities Policy, vol. 50, pp. 40-48, Feb. 2018.
- A. Gabash and P. Li, ''Active-reactive optimal power flow in distribution networks with embedded generation and battery storage,'' IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2026-2035, Nov. 2012.
- S. Gill, I. Kockar, and G. W. Ault, ''Dynamic optimal power flow for active distribution networks,'' IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 121-131, Jan. 2014.
- S. Golshannavaz, S. Afsharnia, and F. Aminifar, ''Smart distribution grid: Optimal day-ahead scheduling with reconfigurable topology,'' IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 2402-2411, Sep. 2014.
- W. A. Bukhsh, C. Zhang, and P. Pinson, ''An integrated multiperiod OPF model with demand response and renewable generation uncertainty,'' IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1495-1503, May 2016.
- T. Soares, R. J. Bessa, P. Pinson, and H. Morais, ''Active distribution grid management based on robust AC optimal power flow,'' IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 6229-6241, Nov. 2018.
- L. Xie and M. D. Ilic, ''Model predictive dispatch in electric energy systems with intermittent resources,'' in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst., Man Cybern., Singapore, Oct. 2008, pp. 42-47.
- E. Mayhorn, K. Kalsi, M. Elizondo, W. Zhang, S. Lu, N. Samaan, and K. Butler-Purry, ''Optimal control of distributed energy resources using model predictive control,'' in Proc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meeting, Jul. 2012, pp. 1-8.
- P. P. Zeng, Z. Wu, X.-P. Zhang, C. Liang, and Y. Zhang, ''Model predictive control for energy storage systems in a network with high penetration of renewable energy and limited export capacity,'' in Proc. Power Syst. Comput. Conf., Wroclaw, Poland, Aug. 2014, pp. 1-7.
- M. Arnold and G. Andersson, ''Model predictive control for energy storage including uncertain forecasts,'' in Proc. 17th Power Syst. Comput. Conf. (PSCC), Stockholm, Sweden, Aug. 2011, pp. 24-29.
- W. Su, J. Wang, K. Zhang, and A. Q. Huang, ''Model predictive control- based power dispatch for distribution system considering plug-in elec- tric vehicle uncertainty,'' Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 106, pp. 29-35, Jan. 2014.
- B. Mohandes, M. S. E. Moursi, N. Hatziargyriou, and S. E. Khatib, ''A review of power system flexibility with high penetration of renew- ables,'' IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 3140-3155, Jul. 2019.
- O. Ma, N. Alkadi, P. Cappers, P. Denholm, J. Dudley, S. Goli, M. Hummon, S. Kiliccote, J. MacDonald, N. Matson, D. Olsen, C. Rose, M. D. Sohn, M. Starke, B. Kirby, and M. O'Malley, ''Demand response for ancil- lary services,'' IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1988-1995, Dec. 2013.
- C. Eid, P. Codani, Y. Perez, J. Reneses, and R. Hakvoort, ''Managing elec- tric flexibility from distributed energy resources: A review of incentives for market design,'' Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 64, pp. 237-247, Oct. 2016.
- H. Klinge Jacobsen and S. T. Schröder, ''Curtailment of renewable gen- eration: Economic optimality and incentives,'' Energy Policy, vol. 49, pp. 663-675, Oct. 2012.
- M. N. I. Sarkar, L. G. Meegahapola, and M. Datta, ''Reactive power management in renewable rich power grids: A review of grid-codes, renewable generators, support devices, control strategies and optimization algorithms,'' IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 41458-41489, 2018.
- P. Pinson and G. Kariniotakis, ''Conditional prediction intervals of wind power generation,'' IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1845-1856, Nov. 2010.
- J. M. Morales, A. J. Conejo, H. Madsen, P. Pinson, and M. Zugno, Integrat- ing Renewables in Electricity Markets-Operational Problems, New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2014, pp. 21-26.
- S. G. Makridakis, S. C. Wheelwright, and R. J. Hyndman, Forecasting: Methods and Applications, 3rd ed. New York, NY USA: Wiley, 1997, pp. 52-54.
- A. Khosravi, S. Nahavandi, and D. Creighton, ''Prediction intervals for short-term wind farm power generation forecasts,'' IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 602-610, Jul. 2013.
- A. Rabiee, S. M. Mohseni-Bonab, T. Soltani, and L. Bayat, ''A risk- based two-stage stochastic optimal power flow considering the impact of multiple operational uncertainties,'' J. Energy Manage. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30-42, Jun. 2017.
- M. A. Ortega-Vazquez and D. S. Kirschen, ''Estimating the spinning reserve requirements in systems with significant wind power generation penetration,'' IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 114-124, Feb. 2009.
- W. Ko, D. Hur, and J.-K. Park, ''Correction of wind power forecasting by considering wind speed forecast error,'' J. Int. Council Electr. Eng., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 47-50, Sep. 2015.
- B. Mauch, J. Apt, P. M. S. Carvalho, and M. J. Small, ''An effective method for modeling wind power forecast uncertainty,'' Energy Syst., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 393-417, Jun. 2013.
- K. Hoyland and S. W. Wallace, ''Generating scenario trees for multistage problems,'' Manage. Sci., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 295-307, Feb. 2001.
- X. Bai, H. Wei, K. Fujisawa, and Y. Wang, ''Semidefinite programming for optimal power flow problems,'' Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 30, nos. 6-7, pp. 383-392, Jul. 2008.
- R. A. Jabr, ''Radial distribution load flow using conic programming,'' IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1458-1459, Aug. 2006.
- N. C. Koutsoukis, P. S. Georgilakis, and N. D. Hatziargyriou, ''Service restoration of active distribution systems with increasing penetration of renewable distributed generation,'' IET Gener., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 3177-3187, Jul. 2019.
- C. Coffrin, H. L. Hijazi, and P. Van Hentenryck, ''The QC relaxation: A theoretical and computational study on optimal power flow,'' IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 3008-3018, Jul. 2016.
- Y. V. Makarov, C. Loutan, J. Ma, and P. de Mello, ''Operational impacts of wind generation on California power systems,'' IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1039-1050, May 2009.
- A. G. Tsikalakis, Y. A. Katsigiannis, P. S. Georgilakis, and N. D. Hatziargyriou, ''Determining and exploiting the distribution function of wind power forecasting error for the economic operation of autonomous power systems,'' in Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Gen. Meeting, Montreal, QC, Canada, Jun. 2006, p. 8.
- M. E. Baran and F. F. Wu, ''Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing,'' IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1401-1407, Apr. 1989.
- IASON I. AVRAMIDIS (Student Member, IEEE) received the Diploma degree in electrical and com- puter engineering from the National Technical University of Athens, Greece, in 2017, and the M.Sc. degree in energy science and technology from ETH Zurich, Switzerland, in 2019. He is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree with the Elec- trical Energy & Computer Architecture (ELECTA) Group, KU Leuven, Belgium. His research inter- ests include planning and operation of smart dis- tribution grids, and power systems optimization. He is a member of the Technical Chamber of Greece.
- PAVLOS S. GEORGILAKIS (Senior Member, IEEE) received the Diploma and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Athens, Greece, in 1990 and 2000, respectively. In September 2009, he joined as a Faculty Member of the School of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering, NTUA, where he has been an Associate Professor, since August 2018. From 2004 to 2009, he was an Assistant Professor with the School of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, Greece. From 1994 to 2003, he was with Schneider Electric AE, the Greek subsidiary of Schneider Electric, where he worked as the Quality Control Engineer, Transformer Design Engineer, Research and Development Man- ager, and Low Voltage Products Marketing Manager. His current research interests include optimization algorithms and computational intelligence techniques for the optimal operation and planning of smart distribution systems. He is a member of the Technical Chamber of Greece.
- Authors
- Evangelopoulos, V. A., Avramidis, I. I., & Georgilakis, P. S.
- Affiliations
- National Technical University of Athens (GR)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 38855-38871
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3007057482
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH – CREATE – INNOVATE (T1EDK-00450)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Keywords
- flexibility services, distribution networks, two-stage stochastic programming, day-ahead scheduling, real-time dispatch, distributed energy resources, line congestion, voltage violation, rolling horizon, variable renewable energy, risk exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review