Cited by 19Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsTechnology and Security SystemsEvaluation and Optimization Models

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk Entropy Modeling of Surveillance Camera for Public Security Application

Open access

Abstract

Surveillance cameras are widely installed at public places around the world, and the video surveillance system plays an un-substitutable role in police work, especially in case investigation. The problem regarding the effectiveness and rationality of the video surveillance system comes into being in terms of its high demand for investment and rising public concern of over-construction potentially. To answer the question, it ought to establish mode and metrics for measuring effectiveness in theory. This article argued that the police video surveillance system is preferably a sensor network than a Physical Protect System (PPS) because its main feature is to provide the police officers with the visual information they need. Once the police cannot receive sufficient information from the system, decisions of public security are given based on limited or misleading information, and there may be some potential risks remained. Such risks of public security are not directly relevant to the integrity and value of the assets but the uncertainty of decision-making, which is different from the one of traditional PPS. In this paper, we proposed an entropy model for measuring the uncertainty based on attributions of video surveillance for law enforcement. Public security risk was divided into three types within the model according to the source of the risk, such as fixed targets (or restricted areas), moving objects, and video information quality. We verified the validity of the model by the simulation experiment of camera field optimization and discussed further work.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.2978247

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.6028/NIST.IR.7709 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.trit.2016.03.005 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TMM.2013.2271475 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/TMM.2010.2100374 · DOI
  5. awad, 2018, TRECVID 2017 Evaluating ad-hoc and instance video search events detection video captioning and hyperlinking
  6. 10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2018, Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT)
  8. 10.1145/1978802.1978811 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TC.2013.45 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jnca.2013.07.003 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/JSEN.2014.2310180 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.adhoc.2011.02.003 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s11263-012-0587-7 · DOI
  14. 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121649 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_38 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10610-017-9341-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/TSMCC.2004.829274 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.111 · DOI
  19. 2009, The Effectiveness of Public Space CCTV A Review of Recent Published Evidence Regarding the Impact of CCTV on Crime
  20. 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.cviu.2010.07.010 · DOI
  22. garcia, 2006, Vulnerability Assessment of Physical Protection Systems
  23. 10.1109/CVPRW.2017.264 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.005 · DOI
  25. fan, 2011, Research on scientific point layout of urban image monitoring system, TV Technology, 35, 107
  26. 10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B2-47-2012 · DOI
  27. chen, 2009, The application and perfection of public security video surveillance system in investigation, Crimelabs Research, 3, 32
  28. 10.1109/CCST.2010.5678713 · DOI
  29. lai, 2015, Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Passengers’ Interests at London Tube Stations
  30. 10.1109/LCOMM.2005.11002 · DOI
  31. 10.2991/ictcs-14.2014.39 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, H., Li, P., Du, Z., & Dou, W.
Affiliations
  • China People's Public Security University (CN)
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
45343-45355
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3009276976
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Basic Research Project of Ministry of Public Security of PRC (2016GABJC01)
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2016YFC0801003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Technology and Security Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Evaluation and Optimization Models
Keywords
surveillance cameras, video surveillance systems, uncertainty measurement, police decision-making, sensor networks, physical protection systems, camera placement optimization, moving object detection, risk classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review