Cited by 19,599Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge

Open access
Everingham, Mark, Van Gool, Luc, Williams, Christopher K. I., Winn, John, Zisserman, Andrew·2010·International Journal of Computer Vision

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multimodal fusion combines sources such as vision, language, depth, LiDAR, and speech to enhance scene semantic understanding.

    “It combines various sources of information, such as vision, language, depth data, lidar, and speech, to enhance the capability of scene semantic understanding [35,36,37].”

    From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    Section 5.1 describes fusion of multiple visual representations for image classification, and Section 6.1.1 says high-performing methods combined visual feature channels. The paper does not support the claimed combination of vision with language, depth, LiDAR, and speech for scene semantic understanding. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • YOLOv1 was benchmarked on VOC Pascal Dataset 2007 and 2012 and used the Darknet framework for training.

    “The architecture, benchmarked on the VOC Pascal Dataset 2007 and 2012 [29], exploited the Darknet framework for training.”

    From YOLOv1 to v8: Unveiling Each Variant–A Comprehensive Review of YOLO (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction identifies VOC2007 as an annotated dataset, and the Abstract describes VOC as an object-detection benchmark. The citation is attached to the dataset description, but this paper does not establish that YOLOv1 was benchmarked on VOC2007 or VOC2012. The Darknet training detail falls outside the cited phrase and is not addressed by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most object detection models use general-purpose datasets where vehicle images are usually taken from a lateral or frontal view instead of a cenital plane.

    “Most object detection models use generalpurpose datasets, such as COCO [12], ImageNet [13], and VOC [14]), where vehicle (i.e., cars) images are usually taken from a lateral or frontal view instead of a cenital plane.”

    From T-YOLO: Tiny Vehicle Detection Based on YOLO and Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Networks (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction identifies VOC as a publicly available object-detection dataset that includes cars. Section 3.1 describes varied viewing conditions, and the Additional Information section says high-confidence car detections show varying poses; neither establishes that VOC car images are usually lateral or frontal rather than overhead. The paper also does not establish how widely object-detection models use such datasets. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RPNs with Fast R-CNNs produce detection accuracy better than the strong baseline of Selective Search with Fast R-CNNs on PASCAL VOC detection benchmarks.

    “We comprehensively evaluate our method on the PASCAL VOC detection benchmarks [11] where RPNs with Fast R-CNNs produce detection accuracy better than the strong baseline of Selective Search with Fast R-CNNs.”
  • For FSCIOD tasks, the data partitioning strategy by Perez-Rua et al. utilizes 20 classes overlapping with PASCAL VOC as new incremental classes and the remaining 60 as base data, with models evaluated using K ∈ {1,5,10} bounding boxes per new class.

    “For FSCIOD tasks, the data partitioning strategy by PerezRua et al. [62] is commonly used. This approach utilizes 20 classes overlapping with the PASCAL VOC dataset [63] as new incremental classes and the remaining 60 as base data. FSCIOD models under this setup are evaluated using K ∈ 1 , 5 , 10 bounding boxes per new class.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]12. Fellbaum C (ed) (1998) WordNet: an electronic lexical database. MIT Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Everingham, Mark
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Published
2009-09-09
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
303-338
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
OpenAlex
W2031489346
Cited by
19,599
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1543 · 2025: 2006 · 2024: 2022 · 2023: 2109 · 2022: 2071 · 2021: 2130 · 2020: 1755 · 2019: 1514 · 2018: 1003 · 2017: 804 · 2016: 641 · 2015: 602 · 2014: 506 · 2013: 352 · 2012: 233
FWCI
180.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
object detection, benchmark dataset, image annotation, evaluation procedures, object classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review