Cited by 60Access Control and TrustIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingUser Authentication and Security Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Data Security Enhanced Access Control Mechanism in Mobile Edge Computing

Open access

Abstract

Mobile edge computing, with characteristics of position awareness, mobile support, low latency, decentralization, and distribution, has received widespread attention from industry and academia, and has been applied to application areas such as intelligent transportation, smart city, and real-time big data analysis. However, it also brings the new security threats, especially data security threats during data access that leads to unauthorized/unauthorized access, alteration and disclosure of data, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of the data. Therefore, access control, as an important method to ensure the security of user data during data access, began to be applied to mobile edge computing. However, the existing access control has the disadvantages of coarse-grain, poor flexibility and accuracy, lack of internal attack considerations, etc., which cannot meet the needs of data security in practical applications of mobile edge computing. In this paper, a data security enhanced Fine-Grained Access Control mechanism (FGAC) is proposed to ensure data security during data access in mobile edge computing. In FGAC, a dynamic fine-grained trusted user grouping scheme based on attributes and metagraphs theory was first designed. Secondly, the scheme was combined with the traditional role-based access control mechanism to assign roles to users based on user group credibility. And then, based on attribute matching the user authentication further verifies whether the user is allowed to perform the access operations to achieve fine-grained data protection. Experimental results show that FGAC can effectively identify malicious users and make group adjustments, while achieving fine-grained access control and assure the data security during the data access process in mobile edge computing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.3011477

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main access control methods are RBAC, ABAC, UCON, and CapBAC.

    “The main access control methods are role-based access control (RBAC), attribute-based access control (ABAC), usage control (UCON), and capability-based access control (CapBAC) [74].”

    From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Related Work section (page unavailable in our copy) discusses RBAC and ABAC as access-control approaches. It does not identify UCON or CapBAC, or present the four as the main methods, so the full list is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. shi, 2017, Edge computing-an emerging computing model for the Internet of everything era, J Comput Res Develop, 54, 907
  2. 10.1109/MobileCloud.2016.16 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2685434 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.future.2019.03.042 · DOI
  5. zhang, 2018, Survey on data security and privacy-preserving for the research of edge computing, J Commun, 39, 1
  6. 10.1109/TrustCom/BigDataSE.2018.00022 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/JSAC.2014.141124 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/MC.2010.155 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/BDAI.2018.8547200 · DOI
  10. ezhei, 2014, GTrust: A group based trust model, Int J Inf Secur, 5, 155
  11. 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2750180 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013856 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2874473 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2951687 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2960033 · DOI
  16. chen, 2018, Survey on network security based on blockchain, Telecom Science, 34, 10
  17. 10.1109/COMST.2017.2745201 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1109/ICBNMT.2011.6155974 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/ICCIDS.2017.8272642 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/ICOMICON.2017.8279039 · DOI
  21. yu, 2020, Research on RBAC model based on attribute and trust in cloud computing environment, Comput Eng Appl, 56, 84

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hou, Y., Garg, S., Hui, L., Jayakody, D. N. K., Jin, R., & Hossain, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Fujian Normal University (CN)
  • Tomsk Polytechnic University (RU)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • King Saud University (SA)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
136119-136130
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044672221
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
11.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
the Competitive Enhancement Program of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Russia (No VIU-ISHITR-180/2020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Access Control and Trust
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
Keywords
mobile edge computing, fine-grained access control, data security, attribute-based access control, metagraphs, role-based access control, user authentication, malicious user detection, data confidentiality and integrity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review