The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Data Security Enhanced Access Control Mechanism in Mobile Edge Computing
Open accessAbstract
Mobile edge computing, with characteristics of position awareness, mobile support, low latency, decentralization, and distribution, has received widespread attention from industry and academia, and has been applied to application areas such as intelligent transportation, smart city, and real-time big data analysis. However, it also brings the new security threats, especially data security threats during data access that leads to unauthorized/unauthorized access, alteration and disclosure of data, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of the data. Therefore, access control, as an important method to ensure the security of user data during data access, began to be applied to mobile edge computing. However, the existing access control has the disadvantages of coarse-grain, poor flexibility and accuracy, lack of internal attack considerations, etc., which cannot meet the needs of data security in practical applications of mobile edge computing. In this paper, a data security enhanced Fine-Grained Access Control mechanism (FGAC) is proposed to ensure data security during data access in mobile edge computing. In FGAC, a dynamic fine-grained trusted user grouping scheme based on attributes and metagraphs theory was first designed. Secondly, the scheme was combined with the traditional role-based access control mechanism to assign roles to users based on user group credibility. And then, based on attribute matching the user authentication further verifies whether the user is allowed to perform the access operations to achieve fine-grained data protection. Experimental results show that FGAC can effectively identify malicious users and make group adjustments, while achieving fine-grained access control and assure the data security during the data access process in mobile edge computing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The main access control methods are RBAC, ABAC, UCON, and CapBAC.
“The main access control methods are role-based access control (RBAC), attribute-based access control (ABAC), usage control (UCON), and capability-based access control (CapBAC) [74].”
From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [74]
The Related Work section (page unavailable in our copy) discusses RBAC and ABAC as access-control approaches. It does not identify UCON or CapBAC, or present the four as the main methods, so the full list is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- shi, 2017, Edge computing-an emerging computing model for the Internet of everything era, J Comput Res Develop, 54, 907
- 10.1109/MobileCloud.2016.16 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2685434 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.future.2019.03.042 · DOI
- zhang, 2018, Survey on data security and privacy-preserving for the research of edge computing, J Commun, 39, 1
- 10.1109/TrustCom/BigDataSE.2018.00022 · DOI
- 10.1109/JSAC.2014.141124 · DOI
- 10.1109/MC.2010.155 · DOI
- 10.1109/BDAI.2018.8547200 · DOI
- ezhei, 2014, GTrust: A group based trust model, Int J Inf Secur, 5, 155
- 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2750180 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013856 · DOI
- 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2874473 · DOI
- 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2951687 · DOI
- 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2960033 · DOI
- chen, 2018, Survey on network security based on blockchain, Telecom Science, 34, 10
- 10.1109/COMST.2017.2745201 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICBNMT.2011.6155974 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCIDS.2017.8272642 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICOMICON.2017.8279039 · DOI
- yu, 2020, Research on RBAC model based on attribute and trust in cloud computing environment, Comput Eng Appl, 56, 84
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends
Sun, P., Shen, S., Wan, Y., Wu, Z., Fang, Z., & Gao, X.-Z. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3372518 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Hou, Y., Garg, S., Hui, L., Jayakody, D. N. K., Jin, R., & Hossain, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Fujian Normal University (CN)
- Tomsk Polytechnic University (RU)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- King Saud University (SA)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 136119-136130
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3044672221
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 11.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- the Competitive Enhancement Program of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Russia (No VIU-ISHITR-180/2020)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Access Control and Trust
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Keywords
- mobile edge computing, fine-grained access control, data security, attribute-based access control, metagraphs, role-based access control, user authentication, malicious user detection, data confidentiality and integrity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review