Cited by 154Robot Manipulation and LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsSmart Agriculture and AI

Object detection recognition and robot grasping based on machine learning: a survey

Open access
Bai, Qiang, Li, Shaobo, Yang, Jing, Song, Qisong, Li, Zhiang, Zhang, Xingxing·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

With the rapid development of machine learning, its powerful function in the machine vision field is increasingly reflected. The combination of machine vision and robotics to achieve the same precise and fast grasping as that of humans requires high-precision target detection and recognition, location and reasonable grasp strategy generation, which is the ultimate goal of global researchers and one of the prerequisites for the large-scale application of robots. Traditional machine learning has a long history and good achievements in the field of image processing and robot control. The CNN (convolutional neural network) algorithm realizes training of large-scale image datasets, solves the disadvantages of traditional machine learning in large datasets, and greatly improves accuracy, thereby positioning CNNs as a global research hotspot. However, the increasing difficulty of labeled data acquisition limits their development. Therefore, unsupervised learning, self-supervised learning and reinforcement learning, which are less dependent on labeled data, have also undergone rapid development and achieved good performance in the fields of image processing and robot capture. According to the inherent defects of vision, this paper summarizes the research achievements of tactile feedback in the fields of target recognition and robot grasping and finds that the combination of vision and tactile feedback can improve the success rate and robustness of robot grasping. This paper provides…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.3028740

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bai, Q., Li, S., Yang, J., Song, Q., Li, Z., & Zhang, X.
Affiliations
Guizhou University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
181855-181879
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092022274
Cited by
154
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China (2018AAA0101800)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51475097, 91746116)
  • Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China Talents ([2016]213)
  • Science and Technology Project of Guizhou Province Talents ([2015]4011, [2016]5013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
Keywords
robotic grasping, object detection, object recognition, convolutional neural networks, unsupervised learning, self-supervised learning, reinforcement learning, tactile feedback, machine vision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review