The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industrial Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0 - Systematic Review, Challenges and Outlook
Open accessAbstract
The advent of the Industry 4.0 initiative has made it so that manufacturing environments are becoming more and more dynamic, connected but also inherently more complex, with additional inter-dependencies, uncertainties and large volumes of data being generated. Recent advances in Industrial Artificial Intelligence have showcased the potential of this technology to assist manufacturers in tackling the challenges associated with this digital transformation of Cyber-Physical Systems, through its data-driven predictive analytics and capacity to assist decision-making in highly complex, non-linear and often multistage environments. However, the industrial adoption of such solutions is still relatively low beyond the experimental pilot stage, as real environments provide unique and difficult challenges for which organizations are still unprepared. The aim of this paper is thus two-fold. First, a systematic review of current Industrial Artificial Intelligence literature is presented, focusing on its application in real manufacturing environments to identify the main enabling technologies and core design principles. Then, a set of key challenges and opportunities to be addressed by future research efforts are formulated along with a conceptual framework to bridge the gap between research in this field and the manufacturing industry, with the goal of promoting industrial adoption through a successful transition towards a digitized and data-driven company-wide culture. This paper is among the first to provide a clear definition and holistic view of Industrial Artificial Intelligence in the Industry 4.0 landscape, identifying and analysing its fundamental building blocks and ongoing trends. Its findings are expected to assist and empower researchers and manufacturers alike to better understand the requirements and steps necessary for a successful transition into Industry 4.0 supported by AI, as well as the challenges that may arise during this process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences
Miller, T. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 · Cited by 5,302
AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment
Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00043-5 · Cited by 1,611
Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robots
Hwangbo, J., Lee, J., Dosovitskiy, A., Bellicoso, D., Tsounis, V., Koltun, V., & Hutter, M. (2019) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aau5872 · Cited by 1,482
Self-citationIndustrial artificial intelligence for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems
Lee, J., Davari, H., Singh, J., & Pandhare, V. (2018) · Manufacturing Letters · doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.09.002 · Cited by 870
Self-citationModel-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learning
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05386 · Cited by 699
Artificial Intelligence in Advanced Manufacturing: Current Status and Future Outlook
Arinez, J. F., Chang, Q., Gao, R. X., Xu, C., & Zhang, J. (2020) · Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4047855 · Cited by 584
Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims
Brundage, M., Avin, S., Wang, J., Belfield, H., Krueger, G., Hadfield, G., Khlaaf, H., Yang, J., Toner, H., Fong, R., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.07213 · Cited by 306
Surface defect classification of steels with a new semi-supervised learning method
Di, H., Ke, X., Peng, Z., & Dongdong, Z. (2019) · Optics and Lasers in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.01.011 · Cited by 241
A global manufacturing big data ecosystem for fault detection in predictive maintenance
Yu, W., Dillon, T., Mostafa, F., Rahayu, W., & Liu, Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2915846 · Cited by 225
Cited by
AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications
Rashid, A. B., & Kausik, M. A. K. (2024) · Hybrid Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277 · Cited by 764
Edge computing for Industry 5.0: fundamental, applications and research challenges
Sharma, M., Tomar, A., & Hazra, A. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3359297 · Cited by 312
Emerging Enabling Technologies for Industry 4.0 and Beyond
Sigov, A., Ratkin, L., Ivanov, L. A., & Xu, L. D. (2024) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10213-w · Cited by 234
Multinational Attitudes Toward AI in Health Care and Diagnostics Among Hospital Patients
Busch, F., Hoffmann, L., Xu, L., Zhang, L. J., Hu, B., García-Juárez, I., Toapanta-Yanchapaxi, L. N., Gorelik, N., Gorelik, V., Rodriguez-Granillo, G. A., et al. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.14452 · Cited by 124
A YOLO-based Real-time Packaging Defect Detection System
Vu, T.-T.-H., Pham, D.-L., & Chang, T.-W. (2023) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.285 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Peres, R. S., Jia, X., Lee, J., Sun, K., Colombo, A. W., & Barata, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 220121-220139
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3111221273
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
