Cited by 92Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsControl Systems and Identification

An Improved Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit Method for Accurate State-of-Charge Estimation

Open access
Zhang, Zhaowei, Dong, Zhekang, Lin, Huipin, He, Zhiwei, Wang, Minghao, He, Yufei, Gao, Xiang, Gao, Mingyu·2021·IEEE Access

Abstract

State-of-Charge (SOC) estimation of lithium-ion batteries have a great significance for ensuring the safety and reliability of battery management systems in electrical vehicle. Deep learning method can hierarchically extract complex feature information from input data by building deep neural networks (DNNs) with multi-layer nonlinear transformations. With the development of graphic processing unit, the training speed of the network is faster than before, and it has been proved to be an effective data-driven method to estimate SOC. In order to further explore the potential of DNNs in SOC estimation, take battery measurements like voltage, current and temperature directly as input and SOC as output, an improved method using the Nesterov Accelerated Gradient (NAG) algorithm based Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (Bi-GRU) network is put forward in this paper. Notably, to address the oscillation problem existing in the traditional gradient descent algorithm, NAG is used to optimize the Bi-GRU. The gradient update direction is corrected by considering the gradient influence of the historical and the current moment, combined with the estimated location of the parameters at the next moment. Compared to state-of-the-art estimation methods, the proposed method enables to capture battery temporal information in both forward and backward directions and get independent context information. Finally, two well-recognized lithium-ion batteries datasets from University of Maryland and McMaster University are applied to verify the validity of the research. Compared with the previous methods, the experimental results demonstrate that the proposed NAG based Bi-GRU method for SOC estimation can improve the precision of the prediction at various ambient temperature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3049944

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zhang et al. validated BiLSTM as a viable SOC estimator, though its RMSE remained below 2.5%.

    “Zhang et al. validated BiLSTM as a viable SOC estimator, though its RMSE remained below 2.5%[85].”

    From Advancements in the estimation of the state of charge of lithium-ion battery: a comprehensive review of traditional and deep learning approaches (2025) · cites this paper as [85]

    Section III identifies the model Zhang et al. proposed and validated for SOC estimation as a NAG-based Bi-GRU, not a BiLSTM. The section on performance at different temperatures reports RMSE within 2.2% for that Bi-GRU model; it does not establish the claimed result for BiLSTM. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, ''Neural Computation,'' Long Short- Term Memory, vol. 9, pp. 1735-1780, Nov. 1997.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Z., Dong, Z., Lin, H., He, Z., Wang, M., He, Y., Gao, X., & Gao, M.
Affiliations
  • Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
11252-11263
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119781965
Cited by
92
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Key Research and Development Plan of the Ministry of Science and Technology (2020YFB1710600)
  • Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2021C01111)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61671194, U1609216)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
state of charge estimation, lithium-ion batteries, bidirectional gated recurrent unit, Nesterov acceleration, battery management systems, electric vehicles, ambient temperature effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review