The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weed Identification Using Deep Learning and Image Processing in Vegetable Plantation
Open accessAbstract
Weed identification in vegetable plantation is more challenging than crop weed identification due to their random plant spacing. So far, little work has been found on identifying weeds in vegetable plantation. Traditional methods of crop weed identification used to be mainly focused on identifying weed directly; however, there is a large variation in weed species. This paper proposes a new method in a contrary way, which combines deep learning and image processing technology. Firstly, a trained CenterNet model was used to detect vegetables and draw bounding boxes around them. Afterwards, the remaining green objects falling out of bounding boxes were considered as weeds. In this way, the model focuses on identifying only the vegetables and thus avoid handling various weed species. Furthermore, this strategy can largely reduce the size of training image dataset as well as the complexity of weed detection, thereby enhancing the weed identification performance and accuracy. To extract weeds from the background, a color index-based segmentation was performed utilizing image processing. The employed color index was determined and evaluated through Genetic Algorithms (GAs) according to Bayesian classification error. During the field test, the trained CenterNet model achieved a precision of 95.6%, a recall of 95.0%, and a $F_{1}$ score of 0.953, respectively. The proposed index -19R + 24G -2B ≥ 862 yields high segmentation quality with a much lower computational cost compared to the wildly used ExG index. These experiment results demonstrate the feasibility of using the proposed method for the ground-based weed identification in vegetable plantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks
Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 · Cited by 7,515
Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review
Liakos, K., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18082674 · Cited by 3,441
Zhou, X., Wang, D., & Krähenbühl, P. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.07850 · Cited by 288
Cited by
Paymode, A. S., & Malode, V. B. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.aiia.2021.12.002 · Cited by 432
Applications of deep learning in precision weed management: A review
Rai, N., Zhang, Y., Ram, B. G., Schumacher, L., Yellavajjala, R. K., Bajwa, S., & Sun, X. (2023) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2023.107698 · Cited by 218
Wang, Z., Li, Y., Zhai, J., Yang, S., Sun, B., & Liang, P. (2024) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126138 · Cited by 55
Weed Plant Detection from Agricultural Field Images using YOLOv3 Algorithm
Dandekar, Y., Shinde, K., Gangan, J., Firdausi, S., & Bharne, S. (2022) · 2022 6th International Conference On Computing, Communication, Control And Automation (ICCUBEA · doi:10.1109/iccubea54992.2022.10011010 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, X., Che, J., & Chen, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 10940-10950
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3119341740
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 24.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weed Identification Using Deep Learning and Image Processing in Vegetable Plantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2021.3050296
- The paper
- Jin, X., Che, J., & Chen, Y. (2021). Weed Identification Using Deep Learning and Image Processing in Vegetable Plantation. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3050296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.