Deep Learning Model for House Price Prediction Using Heterogeneous Data Analysis Along With Joint Self-Attention Mechanism
Open accessAbstract
House price prediction is a popular topic, and research teams are increasingly performing related studies by using deep learning or machine learning models. However, because some studies have not considered comprehensive information that affects house prices, prediction results are not always sufficiently precise. Therefore, we propose an end to end joint self-attention model for house prediction. In this model, we import data on public facilities such as parks, schools, and mass rapid transit stations to represent the availability of amenities, and we use satellite maps to analyze the environment surrounding houses. We adopt attention mechanisms, which are widely used in image, speech, and translation tasks, to identify crucial features that are considered by prospective house buyers. The model can automatically assign weights when given transaction data. Our proposed model differs from self-attention models because it considers the interaction between two different features to learn the complicated relationship between features in order to increase prediction precision. We conduct experiments to demonstrate the performance of the model. Experimental data include actual selling prices in real estate transaction data for the period from 2017 to 2018, public facility data acquired from the Taipei and New Taipei governments, and satellite maps crawled using the Google Maps application programming interface. We utilize these datasets to train our proposed and compare its performance with that of other machine learning-based models such as Extreme Gradient Boosting and Light Gradient Boosted Machine, deep learning, and several attention models. The experimental results indicate that the proposed model achieves a low prediction error and outperforms the other models. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first research to incorporate attention mechanism and STN network to conduct house price prediction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The suggested JGC_MMN method outperforms the current models by a wide margin.
“the analysis shows that the suggested method outper- forms the current models by a wide margin.”
From Intelligent Decision Making for Commodities Price Prediction: Opportunities, Challenges and Future Avenues (2025) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2021
Section D reports that the paper’s proposed joint self-attention model had better average performance than the benchmarks, and Section F says it outperformed the other models tested. The paper identifies its method as Joint Self-Attention, not JGC_MMN, and these passages do not establish that it won by a wide margin. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation
Luong, T., Pham, H., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1166 · Cited by 8,382 · see citing works
Multimodal Data Fusion: An Overview of Methods, Challenges, and Prospects
Lahat, D., Adali, T., & Jutten, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2460697 · Cited by 1,296 · see citing works
Attention-Based Multimodal Fusion for Video Description
Hori, C., Hori, T., Lee, T.-Y., Zhang, Z., Harsham, B., Hershey, J. R., Marks, T. K., & Sumi, K. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.450 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- R. Gupta, A. Kabundi, and S. M. Miller, ''Forecasting the US real house price index: Structural and non-structural models with and without funda- mentals,'' Econ. Model., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 2013-2021, Jul. 2011.
- J. Mu, F. Wu, and A. Zhang, ''Housing value forecasting based on machine learning methods,'' Abstract Appl. Anal., vol. 2014, pp. 1-7, Aug. 2014.
- L. Bork and S. V. Møller, ''Forecasting house prices in the 50 states using dynamic model averaging and dynamic model selection,'' Int. J. Forecast- ing, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 63-78, Jan. 2015.
- M. Risse and M. Kern, ''Forecasting house-price growth in the euro area with dynamic model averaging,'' North Amer. J. Econ. Finance, vol. 38, pp. 70-85, Nov. 2016.
- B. Afonso, L. Melo, W. Oliveira, S. Sousa, and L. Berton, ''Housing prices prediction with a deep learning and random forest ensemble,'' in Proc. Anais do 16th Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artif. e Computacional, 2019, pp. 389-400.
- M. Jaderberg, K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman, and K. Kavukcuoglu, ''Spatial transformer networks,'' in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2015, pp. 2017-2025.
- Z. Peng, Q. Huang, and Y. Han, ''Model research on forecast of second- hand house price in Chengdu based on XGboost algorithm,'' in Proc. IEEE 11th Int. Conf. Adv. Infocomm Technol. (ICAIT), Oct. 2019, pp. 168-172.
- C. R. Madhuri, G. Anuradha, and M. V. Pujitha, ''House price prediction using regression techniques: A comparative study,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Smart Struct. Syst. (ICSSS), Mar. 2019, pp. 1-5.
- T. D. Phan, ''Housing price prediction using machine learning algorithms: The case of Melbourne city, Australia,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Data Eng. (iCMLDE), Dec. 2018, pp. 35-42.
- A. S. Temür, M. Akgün, and G. Temür, ''Predicting housing sales in Turkey using ARIMA, LSTM and hybrid models,'' J. Bus. Econ. Manage., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 920-938, Jul. 2019.
- L. Yu, C. Jiao, H. Xin, Y. Wang, and K. Wang, ''Prediction on housing price based on deep learning,'' Int. J. Comput. Inf. Eng., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 90-99, 2018.
- C. Ge, ''A LSTM and graph CNN combined network for community house price forecasting,'' in Proc. 20th IEEE Int. Conf. Mobile Data Manage. (MDM), Jun. 2019, pp. 393-394.
- S. Law, B. Paige, and C. Russell, ''Take a look around: Using street view and satellite images to estimate house prices,'' ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-19, Nov. 2019.
- X. Fu, T. Jia, X. Zhang, S. Li, and Y. Zhang, ''Do street-level scene percep- tions affect housing prices in Chinese megacities? An analysis using open access datasets and deep learning,'' PLoS ONE, vol. 14, no. 5, May 2019, Art. no. e0217505.
- Q. You, R. Pang, L. Cao, and J. Luo, ''Image-based appraisal of real estate properties,'' IEEE Trans. Multimedia, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2751-2759, Dec. 2017.
- O. Poursaeed, T. Matera, and S. Belongie, ''Vision-based real estate price estimation,'' Mach. Vis. Appl., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 667-676, May 2018.
- A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, ''Attention is all you need,'' in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2017, pp. 5998-6008.
- O. Firat, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio, ''Multi-way, multilingual neural machine translation with a shared attention mechanism,'' in Proc. Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics, Hum. Lang. Technol., 2016, pp. 866-875.
- P.-Y. Huang, F. Liu, S.-R. Shiang, J. Oh, and C. Dyer, ''Attention-based multimodal neural machine translation,'' in Proc. 1st Conf. Mach. Transl., Volume 2, Shared Task Papers, 2016, pp. 639-645.
- J. K. Chorowski, D. Bahdanau, D. Serdyuk, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio, ''Attention-based models for speech recognition,'' in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2015, pp. 577-585.
- J. Chorowski, D. Bahdanau, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio, ''End-to-end con- tinuous speech recognition using attention-based recurrent NN: First results,'' 2014, arXiv:1412.1602. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/ abs/1412.1602 · arXiv
- N. Moritz, T. Hori, and J. L. Roux, ''Triggered attention for end-to-end speech recognition,'' in Proc. ICASSP-IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP), May 2019, pp. 5666-5670.
- S. Watanabe, T. Hori, S. Kim, J. R. Hershey, and T. Hayashi, ''Hybrid CTC/attention architecture for end-to-end speech recognition,'' IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1240-1253, Dec. 2017.
- Q. You, H. Jin, Z. Wang, C. Fang, and J. Luo, ''Image captioning with semantic attention,'' in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2016, pp. 4651-4659.
- X. Zhou, Y. Shen, Y. Zhu, and L. Huang, ''Predicting multi-step citywide passenger demands using attention-based neural networks,'' in Proc. 11th ACM Int. Conf. Web Search Data Mining, Feb. 2018, pp. 736-744.
- L. Gao, Z. Guo, H. Zhang, X. Xu, and H. T. Shen, ''Video captioning with attention-based LSTM and semantic consistency,'' IEEE Trans. Multime- dia, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2045-2055, Sep. 2017.
- Z. Yang, X. He, J. Gao, L. Deng, and A. Smola, ''Stacked attention networks for image question answering,'' in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2016, pp. 21-29.
- J. Xu, T. Yao, Y. Zhang, and T. Mei, ''Learning multimodal attention LSTM networks for video captioning,'' in Proc. 25th ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia, Oct. 2017, pp. 537-545.
- Z. Yue, S. Ding, L. Zhao, Y. Zhang, Z. Cao, M. Tanveer, A. Jolfaei, and X. Zheng, ''Privacy-preserving time series medical images analysis using a hybrid deep learning framework,'' ACM Trans. Internet Technol., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1-22, May 2020.
- S. Woo, J. Park, J.-Y. Lee, and I. S. Kweon, ''CBAM: Convolutional block attention module,'' in Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ECCV), 2018, pp. 3-19.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saeed, N., Shafi, I., Pervez, S., Thompson, E. B., Castilla, A. K., Samad, M. A., & Ashraf, I. (2025) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-024-10837-5 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, P.-Y., Chen, C.-T., Su, J.-W., Wang, T.-Y., & Huang, S.-H.
- Affiliations
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 55244-55259
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3145114763
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 14.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 110-2622-8-009-014-TM1, MOST 109-2221-E-009-139, MOST 109-2622-E-009-002-CC2, MOST 109-2218-E-009-015)
- Financial Technology (FinTech) Innovation Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Valuation
- Keywords
- house price prediction, attention mechanism, satellite imagery, housing amenities, heterogeneous data fusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review