Effective Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Scheme Tuned by Improved NN for Robotic Manipulators
Open accessAbstract
The nonlinearities of the robotic manipulators and the uncertainties of their parameters represent big challenges against the controller design. Moreover, the tracking of regular and irregular trajectories with fewer overshoots, short settling time, and small steady-state error is the main target for the robotic response. The model predictive control (MPC) is an efficient controller to handle the performance requirements. However, the conventional MPC requires the linearization of the system model. The linearization of the model does not cover all dynamics of the robotic system. Thus, this paper introduces the nonlinear MPC (NLMPC) as a proper control method for the nonlinear systems instead of the conventional MPC. Specifically, this work proposes the use of NLMPC for controlling robotic manipulators. However, the NLMPC gains need proper tuning to attain good performance rather than the conventional methods. The neural network algorithm (NNA) considers a sufficient adaptive intelligent technique that can be utilized for this purpose. The restriction in a local optimum reveals the main issue versus artificial intelligence techniques. This paper suggests a new improvement to reinforce the exploration behavior of the NNA to overcome the local restriction issue. This modification is carried out by utilizing the polynomial mutation as an effective method to promise the exploration manner of the intelligence techniques. The proposed system can estimate all states from only the out…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A non-linear model-based predictive control method for robotic manipulators that minimises the settling time and position overshoot of each joint has been provided.
“In [11], a perspective non-linear model-based predictive control method for robotic manipulators, which minimises the settling time and position overshoot of each joint, is provided.”
From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities
Dzedzickis, A., Subačiūtė-Žemaitienė, J., Šutinys, E., Samukaitė-Bubnienė, U., & Bučinskas, V. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12010135 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
- Authors
- Elsisi, M., Mahmoud, K., Lehtonen, M., & Darwish, M. M. F.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
- Aswan University (EG)
- Aalto University (FI)
- Benha University (EG)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 64278-64290
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159112629
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
- Center for Cyber-Physical System Innovation from the Featured Areas Research Center Program in the Agenda of the Higher Education Sprout Project, Taiwan
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
- Keywords
- nonlinear model predictive control, robot manipulators, polynomial mutation, trajectory tracking, PID control, cuckoo search algorithm, genetic algorithm, local optima avoidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review