Cited by 76Advanced Control Systems OptimizationAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots

Effective Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Scheme Tuned by Improved NN for Robotic Manipulators

Open access
Elsisi, Mahmoud, Mahmoud, Karar, Lehtonen, Matti, Darwish, Mohamed M. F.·2021·IEEE Access

Abstract

The nonlinearities of the robotic manipulators and the uncertainties of their parameters represent big challenges against the controller design. Moreover, the tracking of regular and irregular trajectories with fewer overshoots, short settling time, and small steady-state error is the main target for the robotic response. The model predictive control (MPC) is an efficient controller to handle the performance requirements. However, the conventional MPC requires the linearization of the system model. The linearization of the model does not cover all dynamics of the robotic system. Thus, this paper introduces the nonlinear MPC (NLMPC) as a proper control method for the nonlinear systems instead of the conventional MPC. Specifically, this work proposes the use of NLMPC for controlling robotic manipulators. However, the NLMPC gains need proper tuning to attain good performance rather than the conventional methods. The neural network algorithm (NNA) considers a sufficient adaptive intelligent technique that can be utilized for this purpose. The restriction in a local optimum reveals the main issue versus artificial intelligence techniques. This paper suggests a new improvement to reinforce the exploration behavior of the NNA to overcome the local restriction issue. This modification is carried out by utilizing the polynomial mutation as an effective method to promise the exploration manner of the intelligence techniques. The proposed system can estimate all states from only the out…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3075581

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A non-linear model-based predictive control method for robotic manipulators that minimises the settling time and position overshoot of each joint has been provided.

    “In [11], a perspective non-linear model-based predictive control method for robotic manipulators, which minimises the settling time and position overshoot of each joint, is provided.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elsisi, M., Mahmoud, K., Lehtonen, M., & Darwish, M. M. F.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • Aswan University (EG)
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Benha University (EG)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
64278-64290
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159112629
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
  • Center for Cyber-Physical System Innovation from the Featured Areas Research Center Program in the Agenda of the Higher Education Sprout Project, Taiwan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Keywords
nonlinear model predictive control, robot manipulators, polynomial mutation, trajectory tracking, PID control, cuckoo search algorithm, genetic algorithm, local optima avoidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review