A Systematic Review of the Effects of Automatic Scoring and Automatic Feedback in Educational Settings
Open accessAbstract
Automatic scoring and feedback tools have become critical components of online learning proliferation. These tools range from multiple-choice questions to grading essays using machine learning (ML). Learning environments such as massive open online courses (MOOCs) would not be possible without them. The usage of this mechanism has brought many exciting areas of study, from the design of questions to the ML grading tools’ precision and accuracy. This paper analyzes the findings of 125 studies published in journals and proceedings between 2016 and 2020 on the usages of automatic scoring and feedback as a learning tool. This analysis gives an overview of the trends, challenges, and open questions in this research area. The results indicate that automatic scoring and feedback have many advantages. The most important benefits include enabling scaling the number of students without adding a proportional number of instructors, improving the student experience by reducing the time between submission grading and feedback, and removing bias in scoring. On the other hand, these technologies have some drawbacks. The main problem is creating a disincentive to develop innovative answers that do not match the expected one or have not been considered when preparing the problem. Another drawback is potentially training the student to answer the question instead of learning the concepts. With this, given the existence of a correct answer, such an answer could be leaked to the internet, making it easier for students to avoid solving the problem. Overall, each of these drawbacks presents an opportunity to look at ways to improve technologies to use these tools to provide a better learning experience to students.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242 · see citing works
Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009 · Cited by 2,394 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This study follows the steps described in [30] and involves three stages: 1) planning, 2) conducting, and 3) reporting.”
MethodRethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing
Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654316689306 · Cited by 544 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This phenomenon is not exclusive to automatic feedback, as studies have shown that the number of past tests studied is a strong indicator of future tests [67].”
“A neural approach to automated essay scoring,”
Taghipour, K., & Ng, H. T. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1193 · Cited by 537 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Other inputs include a short free form (e.g., a short sentence [12]), long free form (e.g., an essay [13]).”
BackgroundA Systematic Review of Automatic Question Generation for Educational Purposes
Kurdi, G., Leo, J., Parsia, B., Sattler, U., & Al-Emari, S. (2020) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-019-00186-y · Cited by 514 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, automatic feedback has some drawbacks, including the complexity of measuring the feedback quality compared to a manual grader [28].”
BackgroundWeb-CAT: automatically grading programming assignments
Edwards, S., & Pérez-Quiñones, M. A. (2008) · Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/1597849.1384371 · Cited by 314 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Unit testing evaluation of programming assessments was also an early entry into the area, given its simplicity of usage and implementation [8]–[10].”
BackgroundMirchi, N., Bissonnette, V., Yilmaz, R., Ledwos, N., Winkler-Schwartz, A., & Del Maestro, R. F. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229596 · Cited by 296 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This set is completed by applications in medicine where virtual reality and other technologies are being used to support immersive practical experiences such as virtual artificial intelligent assistants [40], surgical skill assessments [41], [42], physiotherapy training [43], and clinical skills [44].”
BackgroundAdvantages and Challenges of Using e-Assessment
Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008 · Cited by 270 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The institutions and instructors acquire the ability to increase students per instructor and provide fast and consistent results [6].”
BackgroundApplying machine learning in science assessment: A systematic review
Zhai, X., Yin, Y., Pellegrino, J. W., Haudek, K. C., & Shi, L. (2020) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2020.1735757 · Cited by 257 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For the discipline-specific ones and using the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) [33], most of the work fell into the categories of the sciences [37], including areas like geology [38], mathematics [20], computer science [24], computer networking [39] (47% of papers).”
MethodMartín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9 · Cited by 228 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We performed an iterative search using Web of Science as a platform for the search given the quality of its database and the iterative filtering capabilities [31].”
MethodOnline Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Personalized Teaching and Learning: The eDia System
Csapó, B., & Molnár, G. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01522 · Cited by 223 · cited 1× · see citing works
“With the rapid growth of technology and internet access, the use of automatic scoring and feedback has accelerated [4], [5].”
BackgroundAutomatic Features for Essay Scoring – An Empirical Study
Dong, F., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1115 · Cited by 212 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Automatic scoring and feedback consist of calculating grades on students’ work and providing personalized feedback using technological tools that do not require human participation [1].”
BackgroundCiolacu, M. I., Tehrani, A. F., Binder, L., & Svasta, P. M. (2018) · IEEE International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME) · doi:10.1109/siitme.2018.8599203 · Cited by 203 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Together with this, several works focused on the ability to create custom learnings paths based on student performance [55], [26], [53]–[58], and the ability to flag students at high risk of not succeeding [51], [59]–[63], [61].”
BackgroundFu, S., Hui-min, G., & Yang, B. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12995 · Cited by 150 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We also expect to see an increase in student engagement driven by the ability to solve problems in a more interactive way given the feedback [108]–[110].”
BackgroundMarwan, S., Gao, G., Fisk, S. R., Price, T., & Barnes, T. (2020) · International Computing Education Research Workshop · doi:10.1145/3372782.3406264 · Cited by 131 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The main positive effects of automatic feedback include the students using the feedback for improvement [23], increased student engagement [24], [25], and reduction of instructor bias [26].”
BackgroundMethodFawaz, H. I., Forestier, G., Weber, J., Idoumghar, L., & Muller, P.-A. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-019-02039-4 · Cited by 126 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…set is completed by applications in medicine where virtual reality and other technologies are being used to support immersive practical experiences such as virtual artificial intelligent assistants [40], surgical skill assessments [41], [42], physiotherapy training [43], and clinical skills [44].”
BackgroundMethodExploring Multi-Objective Exercise Recommendations in Online Education Systems
Huang, Z., Liu, Q., Zhai, C., Yin, Y., Chen, E., Gao, W., & Hu, G. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3357384.3357995 · Cited by 124 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Programming problems are the easiest to use as input for this technology, as they appear in a structured language that computers can understand [95].”
BackgroundAzcona, D., Hsiao, I.-H., & Smeaton, A. F. (2019) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-019-09234-7 · Cited by 114 · cited 1× · see citing works
“From a student perspective, work can be developed to improve the design and delivery of the automatic feedback to improve the experience, including finding a way to personalize the feedback [79].”
BackgroundSearch, align, and repair: data-driven feedback generation for introductory programming exercises
Wang, K., Singh, R., & Su, Z.-D. (2017) · ACM-SIGPLAN Symposium on Programming Language Design and Implementation · doi:10.1145/3192366.3192384 · Cited by 109 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Static ones include comparing the answer to a key or set of keys [16] or running a fixed set of unit test cases [48].”
BackgroundFu, C., & Cui, Y. (2020) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2020.72.1 · Cited by 101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Together with this, several works focused on the ability to create custom learnings paths based on student performance [55], [26], [53]–[58], and the ability to flag students at high risk of not succeeding [51], [59]–[63], [61].”
BackgroundToward Automated Feedback on Teacher Discourse to Enhance Teacher Learning
Jensen, E., Dale, M., Donnelly, P. J., Stone, C., Kelly, S., GODLEY, A. J., & D’Mello, S. K. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376418 · Cited by 99 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other potential adverse effects included loss of human interaction and lack of interpersonal skills while solving problems [64], and lack of personalized feedback that could help outlier students [68], especially struggling students [69].”
BackgroundAutomated Methods of Technical Skill Assessment in Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Levin, M., McKechnie, T., Khalid, S., Grantcharov, T., & Goldenberg, M. G. (2019) · Journal of Surgical Education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.06.011 · Cited by 97 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…set is completed by applications in medicine where virtual reality and other technologies are being used to support immersive practical experiences such as virtual artificial intelligent assistants [40], surgical skill assessments [41], [42], physiotherapy training [43], and clinical skills [44].”
BackgroundAutomatic Grading and Feedback using Program Repair for Introductory Programming Courses
Parihar, S., Dadachanji, Z., Singh, P. K., Das, R., Karkare, A., & Bhattacharya, A. (2017) · Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3059009.3059026 · Cited by 97 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Automated scoring and feedback are not only present both in MOOCs [80] and other systems where the scale requires it but also in smaller settings as a tool to support learning, including introductory programming classes [21], [81]–[83].”
BackgroundLearning Path Recommendation System for Programming Education Based on Neural Networks
Saito, T., & Watanobe, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Distance Education Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijdet.2020010103 · Cited by 92 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The tools used to produce grades and feedback dynamically include ontologies [7], neural networks to identify possible solutions [42], [47], machine learning used to identify learning paths [49], [50], and machine learning used to determine student’s risk of falling [51].”
BackgroundMethodMassive Open Online Courses (MOOCS): Emerging Trends in Assessment and Accreditation
Chauhan, A. (2014) · Digital Education Review · doi:10.1344/der.2014.25.7-17 · Cited by 82 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Like massive open online courses (MOOCs), many new learning environments would not be possible without them [2].”
BackgroundBayerlein, L. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.870531 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Hung, H.-C., Liu, I.-F., Liang, C.-T., & Su, Y.-S. (2020) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym12020213 · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similarly, a more personalized student experience would be expected to lead to better matching between the learning experience and the student’s learning style [111]–[115].”
BackgroundVisualizing Student Opinion Through Text Analysis
Cunningham-Nelson, S., Baktashmotlagh, M., & Boles, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2019.2924385 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
IoT-based students interaction framework using attention-scoring assessment in eLearning
Farhan, M., Jabbar, S., Aslam, M., Hammoudeh, M., Ahmad, M., Khalid, S., Khan, M., & Han, K.-J. (2018) · Future generations computer systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.09.037 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
MOOCs Lack Interactivity and Collaborativeness: Evaluating MOOC Platforms
Gamage, D., Perera, I., & Fernando, S. (2020) · Int. J. Eng. Pedagog. · doi:10.3991/ijep.v10i2.11886 · Cited by 61 · cited 2×
“Other potential adverse effects included loss of human interaction and lack of interpersonal skills while solving problems [64], and lack of personalized feedback that could help outlier students [68], especially struggling students [69].”
BackgroundMachine Learning Approach for Automatic Short Answer Grading: A Systematic Review
Galhardi, L., & Brancher, J. (2018) · Ibero-American Conference on AI · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03928-8_31 · Cited by 61 · cited 1×
“Some of the effects cannot be easily mitigated, i.e., bringing back the student-professor interaction [29].”
BackgroundSahu, A., & Bhowmick, P. K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2019.2897997 · Cited by 58 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These questions include multiple-choice [18], fill-in-the-blank [19], or those with a solution presented in a structured language, i.e., a mathematical formula [20] or a program [21], [22].”
BackgroundPeer feedback to facilitate project-based learning in an online environment
Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2013) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1524 · Cited by 55 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As mentioned by [32], content analysis allows one to find the research trends by analyzing the articles’ content and grouping them according to the shared characteristics.”
Machine Learning-Based App for Self-Evaluation of Teacher-Specific Instructional Style and Tools
Duzhin, F., & Gustafsson, A. (2018) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci8010007 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
A Model of Formative Automatic Assessment and Interactive Feedback for STEM
Marchisio, M., Barana, A., Fioravera, M., Rabellino, S., & Conte, A. (2018) · Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference · doi:10.1109/compsac.2018.00178 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The main positive effects of automatic feedback include the students using the feedback for improvement [23], increased student engagement [24], [25], and reduction of instructor bias [26].”
BackgroundCobos, R., & Ruiz-Garcia, J.-C. (2020) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22316 · Cited by 49 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We also expect to see an increase in student engagement driven by the ability to solve problems in a more interactive way given the feedback [108]–[110].”
BackgroundRico-Juan, J. R., Gallego, A. J., & Calvo-Zaragoza, J. (2019) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103609 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Creation and Assessment of an Active e-Learning Introductory Geology Course
Sit, S. M., & Brudzinski, M. R. (2017) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-017-9703-3 · Cited by 43 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For the discipline-specific ones and using the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) [33], most of the work fell into the categories of the sciences [37], including areas like geology [38], mathematics [20], computer science [24], computer networking [39] (47% of papers).”
MethodAutomatic Assessment of Tone Quality in Violin Music Performance
Giraldo, S. I., Waddell, G., Nou, I., Ortega, A., Mayor, O., Pérez, A., Williamon, A., & Ramírez, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00334 · Cited by 39 · cited 1×
“A couple of papers target areas such as music where immediate feedback is also used to improve the student experience in general musical learning [45] and instrument learning [46].”
BackgroundEffects of Digital Score Reporting and Feedback on Students' Learning in Higher Education
Bulut, O., Cutumisu, M., Aquilina, A. M., & Singh, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00065 · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Given these potential issues, studies on automatic feedback, problem set up, and its effects on student’s education and experience are still being produced [17].”
BackgroundDesign and research potential of interactive textbooks: the case of fractions
Hoch, S., Reinhold, F., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. M. (2018) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-018-0971-z · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“With this in mind, automatic scoring and feedback are being employed broadly in computer science, mathematics [98]–[101], [47], and similarly analytical courses, together with language-learning areas [102]–[105], [36], [97].”
BackgroundCopying@Scale: Using Harvesting Accounts for Collecting Correct Answers in a MOOC
Alexandron, G., Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Chen, Z.-Z., Muñoz-Merino, P., & Pritchard, D. E. (2017) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.015 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This was replaced by human-computer interactions and students to work the system (e.g., creating multiple accounts in a MOOC to gain access to the answers [65].”
BackgroundPredicting student performance in interactive online question pools using mouse interaction features
Wei, H., Li, H., Xia, M., Wang, Y., & Qu, H.-M. (2020) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge · doi:10.1145/3375462.3375521 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Harvey, J. L., & Kumar, S. (2019) · IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/ssci44817.2019.9003147 · Cited by 33 · cited 2×
“Together with this, several works focused on the ability to create custom learnings paths based on student performance [55], [26], [53]–[58], and the ability to flag students at high risk of not succeeding [51], [59]–[63], [61].”
BackgroundMethodSmith, G., Haworth, R., & Žitnik, S. (2020) · Journal of educational computing research · doi:10.1177/0735633120927486 · Cited by 32 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and feed-back are in three areas: 1) programming problems through mechanisms such as assisting the student with the coding [84], [85], analyzing coding patterns [86], [87], automatic grading [88]–[92], and customized feedback [84], [86], [85]; 2) short essays [93]; and 3) extended essays [94].”
BackgroundAn Analysis of the use of Good Feedback Practices in Online Learning Courses
Cavalcanti, A. P., de Mello, R. F. L., Rolim, V., André, M., Freitas, F., & Gašević, D. (2019) · International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/icalt.2019.00061 · Cited by 32 · cited 1× · see citing works
“With the rapid growth of technology and internet access, the use of automatic scoring and feedback has accelerated [4], [5].”
BackgroundAutomatic Scoring of Semantic Fluency
Kim, N., Kim, J.-H., Wolters, M., MacPherson, S. E., & Park, J. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01020 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Dong, X., & Hu, J. (2019) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v9n5p52 · Cited by 31 · cited 1× · see citing works
“With this in mind, automatic scoring and feedback are being employed broadly in computer science, mathematics [98]–[101], [47], and similarly analytical courses, together with language-learning areas [102]–[105], [36], [97].”
BackgroundKrugel, J., & Hubwieser, P. (2017) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference · doi:10.1109/educon.2017.7943079 · Cited by 31 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Automated scoring and feedback are not only present both in MOOCs [80] and other systems where the scale requires it but also in smaller settings as a tool to support learning, including introductory programming classes [21], [81]–[83].”
BackgroundMeasuring code behavioral similarity for programming and software engineering education
Li, S., Xiao, X., Bassett, B., Xie, T., & Tillmann, N. (2016) · Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion · doi:10.1145/2889160.2889204 · Cited by 30 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These include mathematics [47], code [22], and controlled environments such as simulations [40].”
BackgroundIs critical thinking happening? Testing content analysis schemes applied to MOOC discussion forums
O’Riordan, T., Millard, D. E., & Schulz, J. (2020) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22314 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Using the feedback as a trial-and-error exercise or accessing answers using the internet can cause a very detrimental effect on learning [116].”
MethodFaulconer, E., Griffith, J., & Frank, H. (2019) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1664454 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“They primarily highlighted students’ positive reception of features such as immediate grading with the allowance of multiple submissions [54].”
BackgroundDo Rankings Drive Better Performance
Marginson, S. (2017) · doi:10.6017/ihe.2017.89.9833 · Cited by 28
An Automatic Arabic Essay Grading System based on Text Similarity Algorithms
Shehab, A., Faroun, M., & Rashad, M. (2018) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2018.090337 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Short essays can also be looked at, as their complexity tends to be low [96], while long essays prove the most considerable challenge for this technology [97].”
BackgroundUsing Semantic Technologies for Formative Assessment and Scoring in Large Courses and MOOCs
Lancho, M. S., Benítez, M. H., Paniagua, Á. S.-E., Encabo, J. M. L., & Jorge‐Botana, G. (2018) · Journal of Interactive Media in Education · doi:10.5334/jime.468 · Cited by 26 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Automated scoring and feedback are not only present both in MOOCs [80] and other systems where the scale requires it but also in smaller settings as a tool to support learning, including introductory programming classes [21], [81]–[83].”
BackgroundAutomated essay scoring in applied games: Reducing the teacher bandwidth problem in online training
Westera, W., Dascalu, M., Kurvers, H., Ruseti, S., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2018) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.010 · Cited by 26 · cited 1× · see citing works
“With the expansion of these technologies, we expect to see the benefits presented in the works surveyed in this paper materialized beyond the furthering of access, particularly an improvement in grading consistency [106] and the freeing of instructor time to dedicate to other activities [107].”
BackgroundInferring the Climate in Classrooms from Audio and Video Recordings: A Machine Learning Approach
James, A., Kashyap, M., Chua, Y. H. V., Maszczyk, T., Núñez, A. M., Bull, R., & Dauwels, J. (2018) · International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale.2018.8615327 · Cited by 25 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similarly, a more personalized student experience would be expected to lead to better matching between the learning experience and the student’s learning style [111]–[115].”
BackgroundStudent behavior in a web-based educational system: Exit intent prediction
Kassák, O., Kompan, M., & Bielikova, M. (2016) · Engineering applications of artificial intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2016.01.018 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Analysis of an automatic grading system within first year Computer Science programming modules
Hegarty-Kelly, E., & Mooney, A. (2021) · Conference on Computing Education Practice · doi:10.1145/3437914.3437973 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“With the expansion of these technologies, we expect to see the benefits presented in the works surveyed in this paper materialized beyond the furthering of access, particularly an improvement in grading consistency [106] and the freeing of instructor time to dedicate to other activities [107].”
BackgroundExploring the Problems Experienced by Learners in a MOOC Implementing Active Learning Pedagogies
Topali, P., Ortega-Arranz, A., Er, E., Martínez-Monés, A., Villagrá-Sobrino, S. L., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2019) · European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19875-6_10 · Cited by 23 · cited 2×
“These issues included students learning to solve the assessment questions without understanding the underlying concepts [66].”
BackgroundAutomatic short answer scoring using words overlapping methods
Pribadi, F. S., Adji, T. B., Permanasari, A., Mulwinda, A., & Utomo, A. B. (2017) · doi:10.1063/1.4976906 · Cited by 22 · cited 2×
“Other inputs include a short free form (e.g., a short sentence [12]), long free form (e.g., an essay [13]).”
BackgroundSaha, S. K., & Ch, D. R. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1651743 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“…or equivalent level (92% of papers), with small numbers at the early education (2% of papers), such as Saha’s study of automatic grading of explanatory answers in middle school [34] and secondary education (6% of papers) such as Anohah’s analysis of high school computing science courses [35].”
BackgroundBeyond Autograding: Advances in Student Feedback Platforms
DeNero, J., Sridhara, S., Pérez-Quiñones, M. A., Nayak, A., & Leong, B. (2017) · Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3017680.3017686 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“Unit testing evaluation of programming assessments was also an early entry into the area, given its simplicity of usage and implementation [8]–[10].”
BackgroundA computer‐assisted instructional method based on machine learning in software testing class
Zheng, W., Bai, Y., & Che, H.-X. (2018) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.21962 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The most common uses of automatic scoring and feedback are in three areas: 1) programming problems through mechanisms such as assisting the student with the coding [84], [85], analyzing coding patterns [86], [87], automatic grading [88]–[92], and customized feedback [84], [86], [85]; 2) short essays [93]; and 3) exten…”
INTELLIGENT EDUCATION ASSISTANT POWERED BY CHATBOTS
Fernoaga, P. V., Gavrila, C., Sandu, F., & Stelea, G. A. (2018) · 14th International Conference eLearning and Software for Education · doi:10.12753/2066-026x-18-122 · Cited by 19 · cited 1×
“Chatbot technologies could eventually help this area provide a more personalized experience [75], [76].”
BackgroundUsing deep learning to automatically detect talk moves in teachers'mathematics lessons
Suresh, A., Sumner, T., Huang, I., Jacobs, J., Foland, B., & Ward, W. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8621901 · Cited by 18 · cited 1× · see citing works
“With this in mind, automatic scoring and feedback are being employed broadly in computer science, mathematics [98]–[101], [47], and similarly analytical courses, together with language-learning areas [102]–[105], [36], [97].”
BackgroundRefining Student Marks based on Enrolled Modules Assessment Methods using Data Mining Techniques
Alsuwaiket, M., Blasi, A. H., & Altarawneh, K. (2020) · Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research · doi:10.48084/etasr.3284 · Cited by 17 · cited 1×
“Together with this, several works focused on the ability to create custom learnings paths based on student performance [55], [26], [53]–[58], and the ability to flag students at high risk of not succeeding [51], [59]–[63], [61].”
BackgroundAutomatic Chinese Reading Comprehension Grading by LSTM with Knowledge Adaptation
Huang, Y., Yang, X., Zhuang, F.-Z., Zhang, L.-S., & Yu, S. (2018) · Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93034-3_10 · Cited by 17 · cited 1×
“With this in mind, automatic scoring and feedback are being employed broadly in computer science, mathematics [98]–[101], [47], and similarly analytical courses, together with language-learning areas [102]–[105], [36], [97].”
BackgroundAssessment for Learning with Diverse Learners in a Digital World
DiCerbo, K. (2020) · doi:10.1111/emip.12374 · Cited by 16 · cited 1×
“The most commonly mentioned advantages included bias reduction [52] and grading consistency [26], the ability for the instructor to shift focus away from grading into other activities [49], and allowing more students to participate in the learning experiences [53].”
BackgroundImproving Performance Prediction on Education Data with Noise and Class Imbalance
Radwan, A. M., & Cataltepe, Z. (2017) · Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing · doi:10.1080/10798587.2017.1337673 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Appearance Discrimination in Grading? − Evidence from Migrant Schools in China
Chen, Q.-H., Wang, X.-B., & Zhao, Q.-R. (2019) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2019.04.024 · Cited by 15 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Together with this, several works focused on the ability to create custom learnings paths based on student performance [55], [26], [53]–[58], and the ability to flag students at high risk of not succeeding [51], [59]–[63], [61].”
BackgroundInfluentialPoint Cloud-Based Automatic Assessment of 3D Computer Animation Courseworks
Paravati, G., Lamberti, F., Gatteschi, V., Demartini, C., & Montuschi, P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2016.2638811 · Cited by 15 · cited 1×
“…and feed-back are in three areas: 1) programming problems through mechanisms such as assisting the student with the coding [84], [85], analyzing coding patterns [86], [87], automatic grading [88]–[92], and customized feedback [84], [86], [85]; 2) short essays [93]; and 3) extended essays [94].”
BackgroundSome aspects of grading Java code submissions in MOOCs
Király, S., Nehéz, K., & Hornyák, O. (2017) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.25304/rlt.v25.1945 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Cao, Y., Porter, L., Liao, S. N., & Ord, R. (2019) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/3304221.3319739 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This tool continues to be used today [3].”
MethodUsing Android Tablets to develop handwriting skills: A case study
Candeias, M., Reis, M. G. A. D., Escola, J., & Reis, M. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02970 · Cited by 14 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Despite this, some of the works dealt with teaching topics in early education, including handwriting [36] and basic math [20].”
BackgroundDesign and Development of a Machine Learning Tool for an Innovation-Based Learning MOOC
Singelmann, L., Swartz, E., Pearson, M., Striker, R., & Vazquez, E. A. (2019) · Learning With MOOCS · doi:10.1109/lwmoocs47620.2019.8939621 · Cited by 14 · cited 3×
“Together with this, several works focused on the ability to create custom learnings paths based on student performance [55], [26], [53]–[58], and the ability to flag students at high risk of not succeeding [51], [59]–[63], [61].”
BackgroundExploring the effectiveness of continuous activity with automatic feedback in online calculus
Sancho-Vinuesa, T., Masià, R., Fuertes-Alpiste, M., & Molas-Castells, N. (2018) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.21861 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
A chatbot assistant for writing good quality technical reports
Pereira, J., & Barcina, M. A. (2019) · Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality · doi:10.1145/3362789.3362798 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Chatbot technologies could eventually help this area provide a more personalized experience [75], [76].”
BackgroundglGetFeedback — Towards automatic feedback and assessment for OpenGL 3D modelling assignments
Hodgkinson, B., Lutteroth, C., & Wunsche, B. C. (2016) · Image and Vision Computing New Zealand · doi:10.1109/ivcnz.2016.7804418 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
STAGE: a software tool for automatic grading of testing exercises: case study paper
Pape, S., Flake, J., Beckmann, A., & Jürjens, J. (2016) · International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2889160.2889203 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“…and feed-back are in three areas: 1) programming problems through mechanisms such as assisting the student with the coding [84], [85], analyzing coding patterns [86], [87], automatic grading [88]–[92], and customized feedback [84], [86], [85]; 2) short essays [93]; and 3) extended essays [94].”
BackgroundMachine Learning and Education in the Human Age: A Review of Emerging Technologies
Bacos, C. A. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17798-0_43 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Muniasamy, V., Ejalani, I. M., & Anadhavalli, M. (2019) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v14i07.10351 · Cited by 12 · cited 1×
“For the discipline-specific ones and using the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) [33], most of the work fell into the categories of the sciences [37], including areas like geology [38], mathematics [20], computer science [24], computer networking [39] (47% of papers).”
MethodUrsenbach, J., O'Connell, M., Neiser, J., Tierney, M., Morgan, D. G., Kosteniuk, J. G., & Spiteri, R. (2019) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000764 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Examples include [70]–[74] (36%).”
A Case-Study of Automated Feedback Assessment
Mirmotahari, O., Berg, Y., Gjessing, S., Fremstad, E., & Damsa, C. (2019) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference · doi:10.1109/educon.2019.8725249 · Cited by 11
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF AUTO-SCORED ONLINE EXAMS IN BLENDED ASSESSMENT: FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT
Guasp, J. R., Ramírez, M. A., Garayo, A. J. V., Meseguer-Dueñas, J. M., & Gómez-Tejedor, J. (2018) · Educación XX1 · doi:10.5944/educxx1.19559 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Question bank calibration using unsupervised learning of assessment performance metrics
Narayanan, S., Kommuri, V. S., Subramanian, S., & Bijlani, K. (2017) · International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics · doi:10.1109/icacci.2017.8125810 · Cited by 9 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These questions include multiple-choice [18], fill-in-the-blank [19], or those with a solution presented in a structured language, i.e., a mathematical formula [20] or a program [21], [22].”
BackgroundAssessing Performance and Engagement on a Computer-Based Education Platform for Pharmacy Practice
Grindrod, K., Morris, K., & Killeen, R. (2020) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy8010026 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Norouzi, N., & Hausen, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Education Conference · doi:10.1109/fie.2018.8658833 · Cited by 8 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There are fundamental questions about the quality of content and student privacy [117], for example, which are not considered in the study.”
BackgroundConstructing and predicting school advice for academic achievement
Niemeijer, K., Feskens, R. C. W., Krempl, G., Koops, J., & Brinkhuis, M. J. S. (2020) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3375462.3375486 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
UTCPredictor: An uncertainty‐aware novel teaching cases predictor
Wu, X., Zheng, W., Mu, D.-J., & Li, N. (2019) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22166 · Cited by 7 · cited 1×
“Examples include [70]–[74] (36%).”
Smart Quizzes in the Engineering Education
de Freitas, S. D., da Silva, R. D. C., Lucena, T. F., Ribeiro, E. D. N., de Lima, V. C., & da Silva, R. M. (2016) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.17 · Cited by 7 · cited 1×
“Specific learning can be mitigated by generating dynamic problems unique for each student [77], [78].”
BackgroundApplying Machine Learning and AI on Self Automated Personalized Online Learning
Srisa-An, C., & Yongsiriwit, K. (2019) · Fuzzy Systems and Data Mining · doi:10.3233/faia190174 · Cited by 7 · cited 1×
“The tools used to produce grades and feedback dynamically include ontologies [7], neural networks to identify possible solutions [42], [47], machine learning used to identify learning paths [49], [50], and machine learning used to determine student’s risk of falling [51].”
MethodDesign and evaluation of an ontology-based tool for generating multiple-choice questions
Čubrić, M., & Tošić, M. (2020) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-05-2019-0023 · Cited by 7 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Generating the questions in multiple-choice format simplifies any issues related to interpreting the answers [7].”
BackgroundMethodAutomated assessment of multi-step answers for mathematical word problems
Kadupitiya, J., Ranathunga, S., & Dias, G. (2016) · International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions · doi:10.1109/icter.2016.7829900 · Cited by 6 · cited 3×
“Despite this, some of the works dealt with teaching topics in early education, including handwriting [36] and basic math [20].”
BackgroundMethodINTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS - TRENDS ON DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT
Niculescu, C. (2016) · eLearning and Software for Education · doi:10.12753/2066-026x-16-218 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
(2019) · doi:10.1109/embc.2019.8856335 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…set is completed by applications in medicine where virtual reality and other technologies are being used to support immersive practical experiences such as virtual artificial intelligent assistants [40], surgical skill assessments [41], [42], physiotherapy training [43], and clinical skills [44].”
BackgroundAbidi, S. R., Ni, J., Ge, S., Wang, X.-M., Ding, H., Zhu, W., & Zhang, W. (2020) · International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing · doi:10.1117/12.2557066 · Cited by 5
In-Depth Feedback on Programming Assignments Using Pattern Recognition and Real-Time Hints
Rubinstein, A., Parzanchevski, N., & Tamarov, Y. (2019) · Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3304221.3325552 · Cited by 5 · cited 2×
“…of automatic scoring and feed-back are in three areas: 1) programming problems through mechanisms such as assisting the student with the coding [84], [85], analyzing coding patterns [86], [87], automatic grading [88]–[92], and customized feedback [84], [86], [85]; 2) short essays [93]; and 3)…”
BackgroundAutomated Error Detection in Physiotherapy Training
Jovanovic, M., Seiffarth, J., Kutafina, E., & Jonas, S. (2018) · eHealth Conference · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-858-7-164 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This set is completed by applications in medicine where virtual reality and other technologies are being used to support immersive practical experiences such as virtual artificial intelligent assistants [40], surgical skill assessments [41], [42], physiotherapy training [43], and clinical skills [44].”
BackgroundLearning Process Analysis using Machine Learning TechniquesPreprint
Alonso, L. P. (2018) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/srhz9 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Lobanov, A., Bryksin, T., & Shpilman, A. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_33 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The most common uses of automatic scoring and feedback are in three areas: 1) programming problems through mechanisms such as assisting the student with the coding [84], [85], analyzing coding patterns [86], [87], automatic grading [88]–[92], and customized feedback [84], [86], [85]; 2) short essays [93]; and 3) exten…”
2048-like games for teaching reinforcement learning
Guei, H., Wei, T.-H., & Wu, I.-C. (2020) · ICGA Journal · doi:10.3233/icg-200144 · Cited by 3 · cited 1×
“The main positive effects of automatic feedback include the students using the feedback for improvement [23], increased student engagement [24], [25], and reduction of instructor bias [26].”
BackgroundA Generic Tool for Generating and Assessing Problems Automatically using Spreadsheets
Serra, M. A. R., Bikfalvi, A., Masó, J. S., & Garcia, J. P. (2018) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i10.7689 · Cited by 3 · cited 1×
“Specific learning can be mitigated by generating dynamic problems unique for each student [77], [78].”
BackgroundResearch on the Application of Automatic Scoring System in College English Writing
Qu, W.-W. (2016) · International Conference on Economics, Social Science, Arts, Education and Management Engineering (ESSAEME) · doi:10.2991/essaeme-16.2016.140 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Pedagogy and Design of Online Learning Environment in Computer Science Education for High Schools
Anohah, E. (2016) · International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design · doi:10.4018/ijopcd.2016070104 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…or equivalent level (92% of papers), with small numbers at the early education (2% of papers), such as Saha’s study of automatic grading of explanatory answers in middle school [34] and secondary education (6% of papers) such as Anohah’s analysis of high school computing science courses [35].”
BackgroundProgressive Teaching Improvement For Small Scale Learning: A Case Study in China
Jiang, B., He, Y., Chen, R., Hao, C., Liu, S.-J., & Zhang, G. (2020) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi12080137 · Cited by 2 · cited 1×
“Automated scoring and feedback are not only present both in MOOCs [80] and other systems where the scale requires it but also in smaller settings as a tool to support learning, including introductory programming classes [21], [81]–[83].”
BackgroundWeb applications for learning CUDA programming
Wakatani, A., & Maeda, T. (2017) · International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications · doi:10.1109/iisa.2017.8316355 · Cited by 2
Predicting Collaborative Performance at Assessment Level using Machine Learning
Raza, S. A. (2019) · International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS) · doi:10.1109/cais.2019.8769578 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Together with this, several works focused on the ability to create custom learnings paths based on student performance [55], [26], [53]–[58], and the ability to flag students at high risk of not succeeding [51], [59]–[63], [61].”
BackgroundTransforming Curriculum, Exploring Identity, and Cultivating Culturally Responsive Educators
Zwicky, C., & Walls, T. (2020) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s2055-364120200000028008 · Cited by 1 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other potential adverse effects included loss of human interaction and lack of interpersonal skills while solving problems [64], and lack of personalized feedback that could help outlier students [68], especially struggling students [69].”
BackgroundFree response evaluation via neural network for an IMathAS system
Wiggins, N., & Smith, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Measurement and Control in Robotics (ISMCR) · doi:10.1109/ismcr47492.2019.8955695 · Cited by 1 · cited 3×
“The tools used to produce grades and feedback dynamically include ontologies [7], neural networks to identify possible solutions [42], [47], machine learning used to identify learning paths [49], [50], and machine learning used to determine student’s risk of falling [51].”
BackgroundMethodA Cooperative Multi-agent-based Musical Scoring System for Tsugaru and Nambu Shamisen
Kosakaya, J., Kawamorita, R., & Hsu, M.-F. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/ieem.2018.8607447 · Cited by 1 · cited 1×
“A couple of papers target areas such as music where immediate feedback is also used to improve the student experience in general musical learning [45] and instrument learning [46].”
BackgroundBey, A., Bouhineau, D., & Champagnat, R. (2018) · International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/icalt.2018.00089 · Cited by 1
Platz, M., Krieger, M., Niehaus, E., & Winter, K. (2017) · IST-Africa Week Conference · doi:10.23919/istafrica.2017.8102360 · Cited by 1
Bhanuprakash, C., Nijagunarya, Y. S., & Jayaram, M. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-5802-9_50 · Cited by 1 · cited 1×
“…and feed-back are in three areas: 1) programming problems through mechanisms such as assisting the student with the coding [84], [85], analyzing coding patterns [86], [87], automatic grading [88]–[92], and customized feedback [84], [86], [85]; 2) short essays [93]; and 3) extended essays [94].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
13 of the 127 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Y. Takahashi and P. Vate-U-Lan, ''Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on education: An empirical research in Japan,'' in Proc. Eur. Conf. Impact Artif. Intell. Robot., Academic, 2019, p. 433.
- J. Huang, C. Pieh, A. Nguyen, and L. Guibas, ''Syntatic and functional variability of a million code submissions in a machine learning MOOC,'' in Proc. AIED Workshops Proc., 2013, pp. 1-15.
- M. Zhang, ''Contrasting automated nad human scoring of essays,'' R&D Connections, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1-11, 2013.
- P. Bancroft and K. Woodfors, ''Using multiple choice questions effec- tively in information technology education,'' Ascilite, vol. 4, pp. 948-955, Dec. 2004.
- Y. Sugamiya, T. Otani, R. Nakadate, and A. Takanishi, ''Construction of automatic scoring system to support objective evaluation of clinical skills in medical education,'' in Proc. 41st Annu. Int. Conf. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBC), Jul. 2019, pp. 4177-4181.
- M. C. S. Manzanares, R. M. Sánchez, Á. A. González, M. del Camino Escolar Llamazares, and M. Á. Q. Dios, ''Detection of at-risk students with Learning Analytics Techniques,'' Eur. J. Invest. Health, Psychol. Educ., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 129-142, 2018.
- A. Bey, P. Jermann, and P. Dillenbourg, ''A comparison between two automatic assessment approaches for programming: An empirical study on MOOCs,'' J. Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 259-272, 2018.
- A. A. Gamazo, X. B. Illa, M. J. Casany, C. M. Escofet, C. Quer, M. E. G. Rodríguez, Ó. R. Moral, A. U. Tubella, ''A software tool for E-assessment of relational database skills,'' Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, pp. 1289-1312, Jan. 2016.
- L. B. Moreira, A. D. Tamariz, and J. V. Fettermann, ''The use of texts mining in the support to corrections of discursive questions in a higher education institution,'' Texto Livre-Linguagem Tecnol., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 213-227, 2018.
- Z. Huang, Q. Liu, C. Zhai, Y. Yin, E. Chen, W. Gao, and G. Hu, ''Explor- ing multi-objective exercise recommendations in online education sys- tems,'' in Proc. 28th ACM Int. Conf. Inf. Knowl. Manage., Nov. 2019, pp. 1261-1270.
- M. Liu, Y. Wang, W. Xu, and L. Liu, ''Automated scoring of Chinese engineering students' English essays,'' Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 52-68, Jan. 2017.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strzelecki, A. (2024) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Schiller, R., Liebenow, L. W., Steinbach, M., Horbach, A., & Fleckenstein, J. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100199 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Applying Large Language Models and Chain-of-Thought for Automatic Scoring
Lee, G.-G., Latif, E., Wu, X., Liu, N.-H., & Zhai, X. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.03748 · Cited by 276
Fine-tuning ChatGPT for Automatic Scoring
Latif, E., & Zhai, X. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.10072 · Cited by 251
“This strategy is especially useful in large-scale classrooms when manual scoring is impractical (Susanti et al., 2023; Hahn et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMustafa, M. Y., Tlili, A., Lampropoulos, G., Huang, R., Jandrić, P., Zhao, J., Salha, S., Xu, L., Panda, S., Kinshuk, et al. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00350-5 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
“For example, Hahn et al. (2021) mentioned that an automatic feedback system was applied in music education since AI could provide immediate feedback of students, so the instructors could use the feedback to improve students’ experience in general musical and instrument learning.”
Applying large language models and chain-of-thought for automatic scoring
Lee, G.-G., Latif, E., Wu, X., Liu, N., & Zhai, X. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100213 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
RETRACTED: The impact of generative AI on essay revisions and student engagement
Lo, N., Wong, A., & Chan, S. (2025) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100249 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
RetractedChan, S. T. S., Lo, N. P. K., & Wong, A. M. H. (2024) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/15607 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Automatic evaluation of open-ended questions for online learning. A systematic mapping
del Gobbo, E., Guarino, A., Cafarelli, B., Grilli, L., & Limone, P. (2023) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101258 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Shi, L.-H., Ding, A., & Choi, I. (2024) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14111187 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Zheng, L.-Q., Long, M., Chen, B.-D., & Fan, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00415-4 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Prior work found automated feedback contributed to improving learning performance (Keuning et al., 2018) and reducing bias (Hahn et al., 2021).”
BackgroundTeaching and AI in the postdigital age: Learning from teachers’ perspectives
Moylan, R., Code, J. R., & O'Brien, H. L. (2025) · Teaching and Teacher Education : An International Journal of Research and Studies · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2024.104851 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
The Use of Large Language Models in Education
Xing, W.-L., Nixon, N., Crossley, S. A., Denny, P., Lan, A. S., Stamper, J., & Yu, Z. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-025-00457-x · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“…(Liu et al., 2022), socio-emotional support (Li & Xing, 2021), equity and inclusion support (Nixon et al., 2024), automatically generating educational content (Sarsa et al., 2022), especially questions (Wang et al., 2021), and automatic contextual feedback (see the review of Hahn et al., 2021).”
Schiller, R., Fleckenstein, J., Mertens, U., Horbach, A., & Meyer, J. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105163 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Chan, S., Lo, N., & Wong, A. (2024) · rEFLections · doi:10.61508/refl.v31i3.277514 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“However, providing detailed and effective feedback is often a labor-intensive task for educators, with grading frequently cited as a major contributor to teacher workload and stress (Hahn et al., 2021).”
Lo, N., Chan, S., & Wong, A. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251352907 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Meanwhile, marking and feedback is frequently cited by teachers as a significant contributor towards workload and work-related stress (Hahn et al., 2021).”
Ruffle&Riley: Towards the Automated Induction of Conversational Tutoring Systems
Schmucker, R., Xia, M., Azaria, A., & Mitchell, T. M. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.01420 · Cited by 27
“Alternative approaches explored the use of learner log data to enhance ITS components such as skill models and hints (e.g., [4, 8, 5]) as well as machine learning-based techniques for automated questions and feedback generation (e.g., [33, 22]).”
BackgroundCan AI support human grading? Examining machine attention and confidence in short answer scoring
Li, Y., Raković, M., Srivastava, N., Li, X., Guan, Q., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105244 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Exploring undergraduate students' perceptions of AI vs. human scoring and feedback
Thomas, M., Yildirim-erbasli, S., & Hariharan, S. (2026) · Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101052 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
A comprehensive review of AI-powered grading and tailored feedback in universities
Deepshikha, D. (2025) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-025-00517-0 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Although these systems can process vast amounts of data and generate insights, they may occasionally yield inaccurate or contextually inappropriate feedback [24, 46, 56].”
The Impact of AI on Inclusivity in Higher Education: A Rapid Review
Conceição, J. M. C., & van der Stappen, E. (2025) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15091255 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“The two main advantages revolve around time saving for educators and helping students understand their mistakes and learn more effectively (Hooda et al., 2022; Hahn et al., 2021; Calatayud et al., 2021).”
Sudan, T., Hans, A., & Taggar, R. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-10-2023-0202 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Li, C., Zhang, Z., Saugstad, M., Safranchik, E., Kulkarni, C., Huang, X.-Y., Patel, S. N., Iyer, V., Althoff, T., & Froehlich, J. E. (2024) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642089 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“While the nuances between human and AI-feedback in crowdsourcing have yet to be comprehensively studied, researchers in education have assessed the usage of automatic feedback as a learning tool [34, 38, 55, 92].”
BackgroundMoylan, R., & Code, J. R. (2023) · Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice · doi:10.1080/13540602.2023.2263732 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“In assessment and grading, algorithms automatically grade multiple-choice tests (Hahn et al., 2021) and analyse student writing to provide feedback on grammar, spelling, and style (Link et al., 2022).”
Kavitha, K., & Joshith, V. P. (2024) · Journal of Pedagogical Research · doi:10.33902/jpr.202429218 · Cited by 18
“Automated scoring and feedback involve using AI technologies to assess student performance and provide immediate, constructive feedback (Hahn et al., 2021).”
Deepshikha, D. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1108/aiie-03-2025-0036 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Enhancing Arabic Automated Essay Scoring with Synthetic Data and Error Injection
Qwaider, C., Alhafni, B., Chirkunov, K., Habash, N., & Briscoe, T. (2025) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.17739 · Cited by 16
“On the other hand, AES helps students improve their writing quality through rapid real-time scoring and feedback (Hahn et al., 2021).”
Technology-Enhanced Feedback System Usability in the Context of Self-Regulation Promotion
Žerovnik, A. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14090948 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Automated Feedback in Math Education: A Comparative Analysis of LLMs for Open-Ended Responses
Baral, S., Worden, E., Lim, W.-C., Luo, Z., Santorelli, C., Gurung, A., & Heffernan, N. T. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.08910 · Cited by 14
“Hahn et al.[25] found prior methods have typically attempted automatic at the undergraduate level, but typically reduced bias and assisted teachers by decreasing the time they were required to spend grading.”
Classtime.Com as an Ai-Based Testing Platform: Analysing ESP Students’ Performances and Feedback
Ningsih, F. (2023) · Journal of Languages and Language Teaching · doi:10.33394/jollt.v11i3.8286 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Scholars have acknowledged the potential benefits associated with the integration of AI in educational settings, with particular attention given to the advantages of automated scoring and immediate feedback, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (Hahn et al., 2021).”
BackgroundChan, S., Lo, N., & Wong, A. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2440182 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“An approach to coding the data is required in order to complete this process (Guthrie, 2010).”
RetractedJovic, M., Papakonstantinidis, S., & Kirkpatrick, R. (2025) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-025-00389-2 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“As AI technology has advanced, these systems have evolved to handle more complex tasks, such as evaluating constructed responses and essays (Hahn et al., 2021; Caval-canti et al., 2021).”
Li, Y., Shan, Z., Raković, M., Guan, Q., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13741-z · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“…scoring students’ open-ended responses have been proposed as the solution to alleviate educators’ marking workload while improving scoring objectivity and consistency, particularly in courses with high student enrol - ments and limited resources (Attali & Burstein, 2006; Hahn et al., 2021).”
Tlili, A., Huang, R., Mustafa, M. Y., Zhao, J., Bozkurt, A., Xu, L., Wang, H., Salha, S. H., Altınay, F., Affouneh, S. J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.15 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Direct Automated Feedback Delivery for Student Submissions based on LLMs
Sölch, M., Dietrich, F. T. J., & Krusche, S. (2025) · SIGSOFT FSE Companion · doi:10.1145/3696630.3727247 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Strengths and weaknesses of automated scoring of free-text student answers
Bexte, M., Horbach, A., & Zesch, T. (2024) · Informatik-Spektrum · doi:10.1007/s00287-024-01573-z · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“From the learner’s perspective this opens the door to iteratively answering the same question multiple times until the correct solution is found, each time receiving immediate evaluation [5].”
InfluentialAn improved method for extracting essay tangency features in intelligent scoring of English essays
Li, B. (2024) · Intelligent Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.iswa.2024.200328 · Cited by 9
Yıldız, M., Topuz, A. C., Polat, H., Taşlıbeyaz, E., Kurşun, E., & Yeşilyurt, S. (2025) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2025.2539797 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“However, language teachers may have trouble providing feedback due to their workload despite their awareness of its critical role in the progression of students (Golzar et al., 2022; Hahn et al., 2021).”
Xie, M., & Liling, L. (2026) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100375 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“For teachers, AI can facilitate access to more valuable information, enabling them to enhance their lessons (Jihyun Kim and Sellnow, 2020), obtain detailed feedback (Hahn et al., 2021), and optimise their teaching e ffi cacy (Teo et al., 2021).”
Artificial intelligence scoring attitudes: scale development and validation
BODUROĞLU, E., & YİĞİTER, M. S. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13836-7 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“This can lead to students focusing on finding the right answer rather than thinking creatively (Hahn et al., 2021).”
Automatic Prompt Engineering for Automatic Scoring
Xue, M.-F., Liu, Y., Xiao, X.-Y., & Wilson, M. (2025) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/jedm.70002 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Mishra, D. S., & Edwards, S. (2023) · Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3545945.3569734 · Cited by 7
“Feedback from such tools benefits students in many ways [6, 7].”
BackgroundRana, S., & Rai, P. (2025) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-09-2024-0519 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Evaluating User Experience in E-Learning Platforms: An NLP-Enhanced Analysis of Duolingo Reviews
Kong, L., Koh, D., & Antonenko, P. D. (2024) · International journal of human computer interactions · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2427361 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“NLP techniques have also been adopted to evaluate free-text coursework, such as essays, allowing for automated grading and providing constructive feedback on content and writing style (Altoe & Joyner, 2019; Hahn et al., 2021).”
Automated Assessment: Does It Align With Teachers' Views?
Hickman, H., & Bell, T. (2024) · Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3677619.3678113 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“There are also disadvantages; students are given much less creative freedom when being assessed automatically [16], and this may impact their feelings about programming.”
Lawrence, R., Foss, S., & Urazova, T. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3591210 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Beyond the fundamental task of how to evaluate the correctness of student answers, a key challenge is determining the format, frequency, and precision of the feedback [18, 33] provided to students after each submission.”
BackgroundZhang, L., Li, L., Jiang, J., & Zou, B. (2025) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102042 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Generative AI in Assessment and Feedback Generation in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
Yavariabdi, A., Paudel, B., Carleton, T., & de Almeida, C. D. A. (2025) · International Conference on Education Technology and Computer · doi:10.1109/icetc66579.2025.11387416 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Although educational frameworks such as the Bologna process [2] emphasize the importance of student-centered and feedback-oriented practices, their implementation is often constrained by limited time and instructional resources [3], [4].”
Guo, W.-J., & Wind, S. A. (2023) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466216231151705 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“One important psychometric consideration related to mixed-format assessments is that scoring of CR items mainly relies on human judgment, even when automated scoring processes are used (Hahn et al., 2021; Hussein et al., 2019).”
BackgroundYamtinah, S., Ramadhani, D. G., Wiyarsi, A., Widarti, H., & Shidiq, A. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.58459/icce.2024.4983 · Cited by 4
“The increasing use of Automated Essay Scoring (AES) tools, driven by AI advancements, further highlights the potential of these technologies to streamline and enhance the assessment of complex chemistry concepts (Hahn et al., 2021; Zhai, 2021).”
LUD: An Automatic Scoring and Feedback System for Programming Assignments
Hahn, M. G., Navarro, S., & de-la-Fuente-Valentín, L. (2022) · International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/icalt55010.2022.00118 · Cited by 4
Self-citationThe Construction and Application of an Automatic Scoring System for English Writing
Li, A. (2023) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2023.11.115 · Cited by 4
Gao, R.-J., Guo, X.-S., Li, X., Narayanan, A. B. L., Thomas, N., & Srinivasa, A. R. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.03659 · Cited by 3
“As highlighted in a systematic review on the benefits of automated grading by Hahn et al. (2021), automated grading and feedback offer several learning advantages, including consistency, reduced grading bias, and increased student participation.”
Towards Automated Assessment of High School Programming
Hickman, H., & Bell, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Education Conference · doi:10.1109/fie58773.2023.10343243 · Cited by 3
“This can be limited in a learning environment, which we want to avoid [13].”
BackgroundWhen Do Undergraduate Students Prefer AI? Insights into AI Scoring and Feedback
Yildirim-erbasli, S., Dibek, M. İ., Thomas, M. L., & Lesoway, N. (2026) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.3390/bs16071196 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly integrated into the core functions of higher education, influencing how universities teach, assess, and support learners (Hahn et al., 2021; Hockly, 2019; Lee et al., 2023).”
Buhler, B., Bueno, I., & Kasneci, E. (2026) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v40i45.41167 · Cited by 2
“…based on automated writing evaluation, leveraging nat-ural language processing and machine learning (Flecken-stein, Liebenow, and Meyer 2023; Hahn et al. 2021); however, despite its demonstrated effectiveness (Fleckenstein, Liebenow, and Meyer 2023), automated writing evaluation has…”
Requirements for an Automated Assessment Tool for Learning Programming by Doing
Rump, A., Zaytsev, V., & Mader, A. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST) · doi:10.1109/icst62969.2025.10988998 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Configuring these tools to support new exercises is often difficult or even impossible [20] and many are known disincentivize creative or innovative solutions [21].”
Expanding the Horizons of Autograding: Innovative Questions at UBC
Niu, J., Wong, J., Lake, C., Rahardjo, J., Zarkoob, H., Ola, O., Belleville, P., Mochetti, K., Allen, M., Moosvi, F., et al. (2025) · Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3641554.3701892 · Cited by 2
“…consistency in grading [15], improve student learning through providing immediate feedback and enabling iteration over problems [15, 16], increase student autonomy through providing feedback flexibly [15], and encourage students to start assignments early through automated feedback schedules [9].”
Enhancing Remote Learning By Using Competitive Coding Platform
Haqqani, M., Regulwar, G. B., Goud, B. A., Veggalam, S. P., Prakash, K., & Kumar, E. (2024) · 2024 IEEE North Karnataka Subsection Flagship International Conference (NKCon) · doi:10.1109/nkcon62728.2024.10774847 · Cited by 2
“The methodology given by M.G. Hahn et al[3] investigates the pivotal role of automatic scoring and feedback tools in the landscape of online learning, highlighting their significance in enabling the widespread adoption of platforms like massive open online courses (MOOCs).”
Pünjer, H., Schiller, R., Höft, L., Meyer, J., & Jansen, T. (2026) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2026.102980 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Xue-qing, W., & Li, R. F. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2704917 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Meyer, J., Steinbach, M., Schiller, R., Mertens, U., Schaller, N.-J., Horbach, A., Fleckenstein, J., Köller, O., Kizilcec, R. F., & Jansen, T. (2026) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/3774398.3811602 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“However, providing individualized, high-quality essay feedback is time-consuming [29, 99, 108], thus limiting teachers’ capacity to provide detailed input to all students and thereby reducing opportunities for effective practice [26].”
Operating characteristics of agreement metrics in AI-based scoring: a Monte Carlo simulation
Yandi, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1705653 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
aiPlato: A Novel AI Tutoring and Step-wise Feedback System for Physics Homework
Dange, A., Lopez, R. E., Deslauriers, L., & Shah, N. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.09965 · Cited by 1
“Instead of identifying a student’s specific error and offering targeted guidance, the model may return a complete solution without addressing the underlying confusion (Hahn, Navarro, De La Fuente Valentin, & Burgos, 2021).”
Conceição, S. C. O., & Hill, L. H. (2025) · New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education · doi:10.1002/ace.70019 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Automated Scoring Systems and Teacher Assessments in English Language Education
Obera, J., & Ojochegbe, A. T. (2025) · Journal Of World Science · doi:10.58344/jws.v4i10.1517 · Cited by 1
“Ultimately, the findings are expected to provide actionable insights for educators, policymakers, and developers toward creating hybrid assessment models that combine the efficiency of AI with the depth of human judgment (Hahn et al., 2021).”
Automation Support for Giving Feedback in Learning Programming by Doing
Rump, A. (2025) · Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3724389.3731300 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“These limitations can disincentivize students from building creative or innovative solutions [4].”
Long, X., & Wang, J. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Knowledge Extraction (ICICKE) · doi:10.1109/icicke65317.2025.11136799 · Cited by 1
“Conventional handwritten scoring systems, although comprehensive, are time-consuming and susceptible to human bias and subjectivity [7].”
Automating New Zealand High School Programming Assessment - Teachers' Experiences
Hickman, H., & Bell, T. (2025) · IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education · doi:10.1145/3716640.3716643 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Students and teachers may run into issues with precise specifications being enforced [10], and may feel unfairly penalised for missing elements that they believe are unimportant, such as capitalisation and punctuation [20] (although this does give them to chance to program to specific criteria).”
Priya, A., Ahmad, N., John, M., Sinha, A., Konuri, A., Sadeesh, T., & Shaik, A. (2026) · National Journal of Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.4103/njca.njca_71_26
von Kienitz, F., Töllner, F., Hagena, M., & Besser, M. (2026) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100849
Chen, B.-L., Haldar, R., Fowler, M., West, M., & Zilles, C. B. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.21850
“…questions to provide predefined feedback messages, while other approaches attempted to train classifiers on past student responses to select predefined feedback messages, but lacked the ability to provide open-Email ended, text-based feedback Cavalcanti et al. (2021); Hahn et al. (2021).”
Durak, H. Y., & Onan, A. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102322
Magno, C., Sanggayan, J., Bello, Á., & Ballaho, J. C. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on Digital Transformation, Innovation & Sustainable Development (DTISD) · doi:10.1109/dtisd69661.2026.11668141
“While automatic scoring enables educational scaling [10], human feedback produces superior conceptual understanding [11], and vague feedback risks encouraging students to game the system [6].”
Meyer, J., Keller, M. V., & Daumiller, M. H. (2026) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/3774398.3811625
“However, feedback is challenging and time-consuming to provide at scale, especially for complex performances such as essay writing, often resulting in students receiving insufficient or no feedback [15, 16, 53, 59].”
From Human Raters to AI: A Critical Review of Research on ChatGPT in Writing Assessment
Wang, Y.-M., Harmer, P., & Xue, C. (2026) · Futurity Education · doi:10.57125/fed.2026.06.12
Diagrammatic dataset on AI-generated formative feedback for XML-based UML models
Pecuchova, J., Benko, Ľ., & Drlík, M. (2026) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2026.112962
“For example, recent work [ 1 , 2 ] highlights advances in learning analytics for generating personalized feedback at scale and ongoing debates about feedback quality and ethics in automated systems.”
Yin, W.-W., Zhang, R., & Zhang, Z.-H. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (ICDEL) · doi:10.1109/icdel70250.2026.11663702
“In essence, such methods were static standard answers or scoring rubrics, rendering them unable to handle complex problems [12], [13].”
Becerra, Á., Gomez, D., & Pérez, R. C. (2026) · Learning Analytics Summer Institute Spain · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.04729
“…systems can enhance student performance and improve the speed and consistency of feedback delivery, although challenges remain in demonstrating benefits for instructors, ensuring pedagogical usefulness, and generating feedback that is sufficiently informative rather than merely corrective [13].”
Luhurkinanti, D. L., Tsunakawa, T., Purnamasari, P. D., & Ratna, A. (2026) · International Conference Innovation Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1109/iciet69664.2026.11561575
“The advantages of using AES for scoring are reducing the teacher’s workload by automating the grading process of essays [2] as well as minimizing bias and inconsistency in scoring [3].”
Aragon, R., González-Barahona, J. M., & Robles, G. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Supported Education · doi:10.5220/0014691000004021
“This design embodies a “human-in-the-loop” approach increasingly recognized as best practice in educational technology (Hahn et al., 2021).”
An Explainable Hybrid Multi-Block Automatic Exam Correction Framework for Automated Essay Scoring
Preethi, C. P., Kumari, B. A., Gayatri, M., Masthani, S. A., & Lakshmi, M. I. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on Trends in Quantum Computing and Emerging Business Technologies (TQCEBT) · doi:10.1109/tqcebt67648.2026.11681380
Usability of Integrated Scoring System for Competitions with Rubric and Evaluation (I-SSCORE)
Alejandro, L. (2026) · International Conference on Educational and Information Technology · doi:10.1109/iceit68991.2026.11521235
“[15].”
Leveraging LLMs to Grade Code Comments in High School Assessment
Hickman, H., & Bell, T. (2026) · Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3801749.3801753
“Beyond these issues, asking teachers to assess comments manually undermines a key benefit of automated assessment, which is providing rapid feedback to students [5, 9, 16, 17, 25].”
Assessing Students’ Ethical Concerns in AI-Integrated Online Learning Systems: A Study in Batam City
Sama, H., Julianto, & Tjahyadi, S. (2026) · Komputasi · doi:10.33751/komputasi.v23i1.69
Transformer Architecture for Automating Literary Analysis in High School Literature Curricula
Pulatbaevich, A. M., Boqiyev, N., Sultanov, O., Sokhibov, A., Ochilova, N., & Djumayeva, D. (2026) · International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Communication, IoT and Security (ICISCoIS) · doi:10.1109/iciscois62701.2026.11447616
“It evaluated trends, benefits, and drawbacks of automatic scoring tools and feedback methods [12].”
Machine Learning-Based Feedback in Essay Writing: Improving Accuracy and Student Engagement
García, M., Bamba, M., & Zongo, O. (2026) · International Journal of Language and Ubiquitous Learning · doi:10.70177/ijlul.v3i6.2997
Feedback Indicators: The Alignment between Llama and a Teacher in Language Learning
Rüdian, S., Elsir, Y., Kretschmer, M., Cayrou, S., & Pinkwart, N. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.11364
“At the same time, they can offer further educational advantages by reducing biases and increasing grading consistency [15].”
Comparative Analysis of GPT and BERT for Automated Open-Ended Question Scoring
Hwang, S., Sivakumar, S., & Chiong, C. W. R. (2025) · 2025 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE) · doi:10.1109/icaie64856.2025.11158300
“Therefore, there has been growing interest since 2016 in developing an efficient and accurate automated scoring system based on machine learning [4].”
InfluentialAgrawal, A., & Agrawal, V. (2025) · Journal of student-scientists' research · doi:10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8712
“AI quizzes are more efficient in tracking a student’s performance over time and they offer a clear picture of the strengths as well as weaknesses of the students’ abilities (Hahn et al., 2021).”
Salsabilah, F. T., Emaliana, I., Sutiyarti, U., & Setiawati, E. (2024) · LITERA · doi:10.21831/ltr.v23i3.76585
“Additionally, automatic scoring and feedback can scale the number of students without adding a proportional number of instructors, improve student experience by reducing time between submission and feedback, and remove bias in scoring (Hahn et al., 2021).”
Feedback Systems on Computer Programming Courses: A Systematic Literature Review
Castellanos, H., Vieira, C., & Magana, A. J. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3665047
“…one or have not been considered when preparing the problem, (b) such restrictions may train the student to answer the question instead of learning the concepts [21]; and (c) in the case of LLMs, this may result in a downward trend in final grades with an increased reliance on the use of LLMs [17].”
Harnessing Transformers for Enhancing Arabic Educational Assessment
Nabil, E., Saeed, M. M., Reda, R., Faizullah, S., & Gomaa, W. (2025) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.12.2474
“Additionally, this system accelerates the grading process, providing timely feedback crucial for students’ academic progress and comprehension [2, 3].”
Untitled work
Chan, C. K. Y., Lo, N., & Wong, G. (2024)
- Authors
- Hahn, M. G., Navarro, S. M. B., De La Fuente Valentin, L., & Burgos, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (ES)
- Escuela Superior de Ingeniería y Tecnología (ESIT), Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 108190-108198
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3188564437
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Re-Unir (International University of La Rioja) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- PLeNTaS Project “Proyectos I+D+i 2019” (PID2019-111430RB-I00)
- PL-NETO Project “Proyecto PROPIO UNIR” (B0036)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Keywords
- automatic scoring, automated feedback, online learning, massive open online courses, essay scoring, multiple-choice questions, student motivation, instructor workload, grading bias, student learning experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review