CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 158Machine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionInternet of Things and AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental Setup for Online Fault Diagnosis of Induction Machines via Promising IoT and Machine Learning: Towards Industry 4.0 Empowerment

Open access
Tran, Minh-Quang, Elsisi, Mahmoud, Mahmoud, Karar, Liu, Meng-Kun, Lehtonen, Matti, Darwish, Mohamed M. F.·2021·IEEE Access
DOI 10.1109/access.2021.3105297
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In recent years, the internet of things (IoT) represents the main core of Industry 4.0 for cyber-physic systems (CPS) in order to improve the industrial environment. Accordingly, the application of IoT and CPS has been expanded in applied electrical systems and machines. However, cybersecurity represents the main challenge of the implementation of IoT against cyber-attacks. In this regard, this paper proposes a new IoT architecture based on utilizing machine learning techniques to suppress cyber-attacks for providing reliable and secure online monitoring for the induction motor status. In particular, advanced machine learning techniques are utilized here to detect cyber-attacks and motor status with high accuracy. The proposed infrastructure validates the motor status via communication channels and the internet connection with economical cost and less effort on connecting various networks. For this purpose, the CONTACT Element platform for IoT is adopted to visualize the processed data based on machine learning techniques through a graphical dashboard. Once the cyber-attacks signal has been detected, the proposed IoT platform based on machine learning will be visualized automatically as fake data on the dashboard of the IoT platform. Different experimental scenarios with data acquisition are carried out to emphasize the performance of the suggested IoT topology. The results confirm that the proposed IoT architecture based on the machine learning technique can effectively visualize all faults of the motor status as well as the cyber-attacks on the networks. Moreover, all faults of the motor status and the fake data, due to the cyber-attacks, are successfully recognized and visualized on the dashboard of the proposed IoT platform with high accuracy and more clarified visualization, thereby contributing to enhancing the decision-making about the motor status. Furthermore, the introduced IoT architecture with Random Forest algorithm provides an effective detection for the faults on motor due to the vibration under industrial conditions with excellent accuracy of 99.03% that is significantly greater than the other machine learning algorithms. Besides, the proposed IoT has low latency to recognize the motor faults and cyber-attacks to present them in the main dashboard of the IoT platform.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3105297

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2020, IoT Platform for Digital Business Models | CONTACT Software
  2. 1883, International standard time, Science, 1, 159

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–157 of 157

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tran, M.-Q., Elsisi, M., Mahmoud, K., Liu, M.-K., Lehtonen, M., & Darwish, M. M. F.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • Aswan University (EG)
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Benha University (EG)
ORCID
Venue
IEEE Access
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
115429-115441
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/access.2021.3105297
OpenAlex
W3195071730
Cited by
158
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 14
FWCI
12.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
  • Center for Cyber-physical System Innovation from the Featured Areas Research Center Program in the Agenda of the Higher Education Sprout Project, Taiwan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
induction motor fault diagnosis, real-time fault diagnosis, Internet of Things, cyberattack detection, IoT architecture, Industry 4.0, cyber-physical systems, random forest, vibration-based fault detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review