Cited by 83Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Financial Distress and Bankruptcy PredictionBanking stability, regulation, efficiency

Explainability of Machine Learning Models for Bankruptcy Prediction

Open access
Park, Min Sue, Son, Hwijae, Hyun, Chongseok, Hwang, Hyung Ju·2021·IEEE Access

Abstract

As the amount of data increases, it is more likely that the assumptions in the existing economic analysis model are unsatisfied or make it difficult to establish a new analysis model. Therefore, there has been increased demand for applying the machine learning methodology to bankruptcy prediction due to its high performance. By contrast, machine learning models usually operate as black-boxes but credit rating regulatory systems require the provisioning of appropriate information regarding credit rating standards. If machine learning models have sufficient interpretablility, they would have the potential to be used as effective analytical models in bankruptcy prediction. From this aspect, we study the explainability of machine learning models for bankruptcy prediction by applying the Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) algorithm, which measures the feature importance for each data point. To compare how the feature importance measured through LIME differs from that of models themselves, we first applied this algorithm to typical tree-based models that have ability to measure the feature importance of the models themselves. We showed that the feature importance measured through LIME could be a consistent generalization of the feature importance measured by tree-based models themselves. Moreover, we study the consistency of the feature importance through the model’s predicted bankruptcy probability, which suggests the possibility that observations of important features can be used as a basis for the fair treatment of loan eligibility requirements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3110270

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • XAI complements AI suggestions with explanations to ensure they are discrimination-free and thoroughly founded, rendering AI methods usable in the industry.

    “XAI complements these suggestions with explanations to ensure they are discrimination-free and thoroughly founded, rendering the AI methods usable in the industry (Park et al. 2021).”
  • ML has been most widely employed across client-facing operations in addition to anti-money laundering and anomaly detection.

    “ML has been most widely employed across client-facing operations (including advertising and client support) in addition to anti-money laundering and anomaly detection.”
  • Several businesses also leverage ML in trading cost and implementation, credit risk analysis, and traditional insurance costing and screening.

    “Several businesses also leverage ML in trading cost and implementation, credit risk analysis, and traditional insurance costing and screening [25], [77].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, M. S., Son, H., Hyun, C., & Hwang, H. J.
Affiliations
Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Hwang, Hyung Ju
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
124887-124899
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198090055
Cited by
83
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1E1A1A03070105, NRF-2019R1A5A1028324)
  • Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (2019-0-01906)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Keywords
bankruptcy prediction, explainability, lime, feature importance, tree-based models, black-box models, credit ratings, loan eligibility, credit risk provisioning, model interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review