Cited by 8Smart Grid Security and ResilienceNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionInformation and Cyber Security

Exploiting the temporal behavior of state transitions for intrusion detection in ICS/SCADA

Open access
Kabasele Ndonda, Gorby, Sadre, Ramin·2022·IEEE Access

Abstract

Industrial Control Systems (ICS) monitor and control physical processes. The security of ICS has drawn the attention of many researchers since successful cyber-attacks against ICS can cause extensive damage in the physical world. Most of the existing literature describes solutions to protect an ICS against attacks directly targeting its underlying IT infrastructure. However, there are comparatively less works that focus on detecting cyber attacks against the physical process itself. Detection mechanisms that do so are said to be process aware. In this paper, we propose a time-based process aware intrusion detection system (IDS) that detects attacks against a physical process by leveraging its regular nature and temporal properties. The IDS learns the temporal behavior of the process variables and uses it to detect attacks. We evaluate the performance of our IDS on a public SCADA dataset and on a simulated SCADA system developed as part of this study, and we compare it with two other process-aware IDS proposed in the literature. The results show that our solution is able to detect attacks that are not detected by IDS that ignore temporal properties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2022.3213080

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prediction-residual-oriented methods are powerful for detecting subtle and coordinated process anomalies, including multi-point stealthy attacks that forge SCADA histories or slowly drive the system toward unsafe states.

    “Third, in terms of detection capability and failure modes, the results indicate that prediction-residual-oriented methods are powerful for detecting subtle and coordinated process anomalies, including multi-point stealthy attacks that forge SCADA histories or slowly drive the system toward unsafe states [69,72,73,75,76].”

    From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [75]

    In the SWaT evaluation results (section labeled “1) Description”; page not provided), the paper says the prediction-based AR-IDS detected only a small number of attacks and was better suited to sudden changes than to attacks that develop slowly. It specifically reports that AR-IDS missed a subtle attack that increased a sensor value slightly each second. The copy does not establish the claim about forged SCADA histories or coordinated multi-point attacks. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Process data are particularly suitable for attacks that perturb the physical process state while keeping network-level statistics relatively unchanged, such as false data injection, malicious command or parameter manipulation, process-oriented attacks, and stealthy drifts in sensor trajectories.

    “First, process data are particularly suitable for attacks that perturb the physical process state while keeping network-level statistics relatively unchanged-such as false data injection, malicious command or parameter manipulation, process-oriented attacks, and stealthy drifts in sensor trajectories [67,69-73,75,76].”

    From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [75]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies that explicitly model multiple normal modes or use probabilistic residuals address operating-mode changes by representing them and assigning anomaly scores based on deviation probabilities.

    “Studies that explicitly model multiple normal modes or use probabilistic residuals address this by representing operating-mode changes and assigning anomaly scores based on deviation probabilities [70,75].”

    From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [75]

    In “Step 2: Time pattern extraction” (page unavailable), the paper models observed state transitions and assigns Local Outlier Factor scores based on local-density deviation. That supports representing normal transition patterns and scoring anomalies, but it does not describe explicitly modeling multiple operating modes or assigning scores based on deviation probabilities. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The distribution of datasets shows a strong reliance on SWaT and WADI for benchmarking prediction-residual-based methods, with additional evidence from custom-built avionics, robotics, temperature-control, offshore wind farm, and simulation-based CPS testbeds.

    “Finally, the distribution of datasets shows a strong reliance on SWaT and WADI for benchmarking prediction-residual-based methods, with additional evidence from custombuilt avionics, robotics, temperature-control, offshore wind farm, and simulation-based CPS testbeds [67-73,75,76].”

    From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [75]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In many works, a model predicts the next-step sensor or control-signal values and computes prediction residuals, or derives an anomaly score that functions as a probabilistic or density-based residual, so that small but systematic deviations in process dynamics can be detected even when they are not visible at the network layer.

    “In many of these works, a model predicts the next-step sensor or control-signal values and computes prediction residuals, or derives an anomaly score that functions as a probabilistic or density-based residual, so that small but systematic deviations in process dynamics can be detected even when they are not visible at the network layer [67,69,70,72,73,75].”

    From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [75]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. C.-Y. Lin and S. Nadjm-Tehrani, "Timing patterns and correlations in spontaneous {SCADA} traffic for anomaly detection," in 22nd Interna- tional Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses (RAID 2019), 2019, pp. 73-88.
  2. Z. Yang, L. He, P. Cheng, J. Chen, D. K. Yau, and L. Du, "Plc-sleuth: Detecting and localizing PLC intrusions using control invariants," in 23rd International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses (RAID 2020), 2020, pp. 333-348.

Authors
Kabasele Ndonda, G., & Sadre, R.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2022
Volume
10
Pages
111171-111187
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312722626
Cited by
8
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
SPW Recherche Program of Wallonia, Belgium, through Win2Wal Project PrEDICT (211012)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
intrusion detection, industrial control systems, SCADA, temporal behavior, process parameters, cyber-physical attacks, attack detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review