CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 232Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Internet of Things (IoT) Security With Blockchain Technology: A State-of-the-Art Review

Open access
Ayub Khan, Abdullah, Laghari, Asif Ali, Shaikh, Zaffar Ahmed, Dacko-Pikiewicz, Zdzislawa, Kot, Sebastian·2022·IEEE Access
DOI 10.1109/access.2022.3223370
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

With the rapid enhancement in the design and development of the Internet of Things creates a new research interest in the adaptation in industrial domains. It is due to the impact of distributed emerging technology and topology of industrial Internet of Things and the security-related resource constraints of industrial 5.0. This conducts new paradigm along with critical challenges to the existing information preservation, node transactions and communication, transmission, trust and privacy, and security protection related problems. These critical aspects pose serious limitations and issues for the industry to provide industrial data integrity, information exchange reliability, provenance, and trustworthiness for the overall activities and service delivery prospects. In addition, the intersection of blockchain and industrial IoT has gained more consideration and research interest. However, there is an emerging limitation between the inadequate performance of industrial IoT and connected nodes, and the high resource requirement of permissioned private blockchain ledger has not yet been tackled with the complete solution. Due to the introductions of NuCypher Re-Encryption infrastructure, hashing tree and allocation, and deployment of blockchain proof-of-work required more computational power as well. This paper is divided into three different folds; first, we studied various related literature of blockchain-enabling industrial Internet of Things and its critical implementation challenging aspects along with the solution. Secondly, we proposed a blockchain hyperledger sawtooth-enabled framework. This framework provides a secure and trusted execution environment, in which service delivery mechanisms and protocols are designed with an acknowledgment, including the immutable ledger storage security, along with the peer-to-peer network on-chain and off-chain communication of industrial activities. Thirdly, we design pseudo-chain codes and consensus protocols to provide smooth industrial node streamline transactions and broadcast content. The proposed multiple proof-of-work investigated and simulated using Hyperledger Sawtooth-enabled docker for testing to exchange information between connected devices of industrial Internet of Things within the limited usage of resource constraints.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2022.3223370

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

3 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 107 references

1 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. naydenova, 2021, Data quality: Enterprise Initiatives’ issues and WSN challenges, Sens Transducers, 251, 37

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–232 of 232

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ayub Khan, A., Laghari, A. A., Shaikh, Z. A., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., & Kot, S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Science, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Sindh Madressatul Islam University (PK)
  • Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University (PK)
  • Department of Management, Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, Dabrowa Góornicza, Poland
  • Częstochowa University of Technology (PL)
ORCID
Venue
IEEE Access
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2022
Volume
10
Pages
122679-122695
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/access.2022.3223370
OpenAlex
W4312543091
Cited by
223
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 4
FWCI
48.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
Internet of Things security, blockchain, Industrial Internet of Things, Hyperledger Sawtooth, proof-of-work consensus, resource-constrained devices, data integrity, trust and privacy, peer-to-peer communication, consensus algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review