The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PG-YOLO: A Novel Lightweight Object Detection Method for Edge Devices in Industrial Internet of Things
Open accessAbstract
With the rapid development of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) technology, video surveillance devices and video data in IIoT environments are massively growing and increasingly important. Deploying rapidly evolving deep learning-based object detection algorithms in IIoT can improve the efficiency of video data utilization and increase the automation and intelligence of the IIoT. Facing the transmission latency problem of massive video data, the algorithms are better deployed in edge devices. However, due to the large size and high computing power requirements of existing object detection algorithms, it is difficult to deploy them on edge devices with limited performance. Therefore, to solve this problem, we propose a smaller and less computationally intensive object detection algorithm, PG-YOLO. We replaced all the convolutional modules of YOLOV5 with low computational ghost modules and streamlined the backbone network to improve the network performance. Then, we propose a better pruning algorithm to compress the network, and finally improve the accuracy by distillation to obtain PG-YOLO. PG-YOLO is smaller and faster and can be deployed in edge devices. In addition, we conducted experimental validation on the SHWD dataset. The experimental results show that PG-YOLO can compress the volume of the model by 9 times compared with YOLOv5s, and the compressed detection accuracy reaches 0.934, with only 0.1% loss of accuracy. Also, the time required for inference is reduced by 32.7%, and the inference speed is improved by 10 FPS. Compared with other object detection algorithms, PG-YOLO also has advantages.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“PG-YOLO was developed as a lightweight version for edge devices in IoT networks. Improved inference speed without sacrificing accuracy, achieving an mAP of 93.3%.”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [117]
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers
Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., & Zagoruyko, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13 · Cited by 18,285
ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design
Ma, N., Zhang, X., Zheng, H.-T., & Sun, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_8 · Cited by 7,356 · cited 1×
“ShuffleNetV2 [29] further considers the actual speed of the object hardware for compact design.”
BackgroundDeep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey
Liu, L., Ouyang, W., Wang, X., Fieguth, P., Chen, J., Liu, X., & Pietikäinen, M. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-019-01247-4 · Cited by 2,965
Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networks
He, Y., Zhang, X., & Sun, J. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.155 · Cited by 2,647
Dynamic DETR: End-to-End Object Detection with Dynamic Attention
Dai, X., Chen, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, P., Yuan, L., & Zhang, L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00298 · Cited by 456
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- ge, 2021, YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO series in 2021, arXiv 2107 08430
- 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105742 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3041783 · DOI
- han, 2015, Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural network, Proc 29th Annu Conf Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 1
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.754 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2017.298 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2298/CSIS200316007S · DOI
- 10.1109/ICARSC.2018.8374166 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.690 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021508 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCVW54120.2021.00314 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMM.2021.3070138 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107260 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00972 · DOI · Paper page
- liu, 2016, SSD: Single shot MultiBox detector, Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis, 21
- 10.1109/ICEFEET51821.2022.9847812 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41598-021-02805-y · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00140 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069137 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995583 · DOI
- bochkovskiy, 2020, YOLOv4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection, arXiv 2004 10934
- 10.1109/TII.2018.2852491 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICCV.2017.322 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2884906 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1049/hve2.12221 · DOI
- vaswani, 2017, Attention is all you need, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 30, 1
- zhu, 2020, Deformable DETR: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection, Proc Int Conf Learn Represent, 1
- howard, 2017, MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications, arXiv 1704 04861
- 10.1109/ICCVW54120.2021.00312 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, C., Pang, C., Li, Z., Zeng, X., & Hu, X.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai University of Electric Power (CN)
- Fudan University (CN)
- University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 123736-123745
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4312327909
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (SGSCJY00GHJS2000014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- lightweight object detection, edge devices, Industrial Internet of Things, YOLOv5, GhostConv, network pruning, knowledge distillation, video surveillance, model compression, inference speed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review