Cited by 42Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Surface Defect Detection of Industrial Parts Based on YOLOv5

Open access
Le, Hai Feng, Zhang, Lu Jia, Liu, Yan Xia·2022·IEEE Access

Abstract

Industrial product quality inspection, a crucial procedure in industrial production, is crucial in assuring product yield. Product safety and quality inspections on industrial assembly lines are predominantly manual, and there is currently a dearth of safe and dependable inspection techniques. An improved surface defect detection approach based on YOLOv5 is proposed for the problem of surface flaws in industrial components in order to improve the quality detection effect of industrial production parts. To improve the effect of dense object detection, the image features are extracted by the convolutional network and enhanced by coordinate attention. BiFPN is utilized to fuse multi-scale features in order to lower the rate of missed detection and false detection for small target samples. The detectors from the Transformer structure are added to the complex problem of fine-grained detection to improve the predictability of challenging occurrences. According to the experimental findings, on the dataset for industrial parts defects, the proposed network increases the recall of the original algorithm in abnormal classes by 5.3%, reaching 91.6%. Its inference speed can approach 95FPS, indicating an improved real-time detection performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2022.3228687

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • YOLOv5 combined with transformers detected small-scale objects and defects using a bidirectional feature pyramid network, achieving an mAP of 75.2% on grayscale imagery of surface defects.

    “Combined YOLO with transformers to detect small-scale objects and defects. Proposed a bidirectional feature pyramid network, achieving an mAP of 75.2%.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Le, H. F., Zhang, L. J., & Liu, Y. X.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Key Laboratory of Information Service Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China
  • College of Urban Rail Transit and Logistics, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2022
Volume
10
Pages
130784-130794
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313127358
Cited by
42
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Science and Technology Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KM201911417007)
  • key Program of Beijing Union University for Educational Reform (JY2021Z002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
surface defect detection, industrial components, YOLOv5, object detection, coordinate attention, BiFPN, multi-scale feature fusion, transformer models, small object detection, quality inspection, real-time detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review