Cited by 12EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyEmotion and Mood Recognition

A P300-Based Speller Design Using a MINMAX Riemannian Geometry Scheme and Convolutional Neural Network

Open access
Aghili, Seyedeh Nadia, Erfanian, Abbas·2023·IEEE Access

Abstract

A P300-based speller BCI with large target symbols was designed to improve the detection accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR) as well as to overcome adjacency, crowding, and fatigue problems. The speller paradigm consists of a$8\times 7$speller matrix which uses only 8 flashing characters for selection. Another critical issue in the design of the BCI speller is the feature extraction and classification algorithms. The symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrix of data has emerged as a compact and informative representation of brain signals conveying spatial information. A geometric way to analyze SPD matrices is through the Riemannian geometry (RG) which has been shown to overcome the limitations of Euclidean geometry and provides robustness with respect to outlier and possess good generalization abilities. However, for large data sets, when the number of channels is large, we encounter the curse of dimensionality problem in computing the covariance matrix and constructing the Riemannian graph. To overcome this problem and be able to construct a low-dimensional SPD, we propose a hybrid method based on a convolutional neural network and RG. A mapping that relies on the RG, is proposed to extract the maximum discriminative features. The experimental results from 6 subjects showed that the proposed BCI speller achieved promising accuracy (ITR) of 95±3.6% (26.73±1.8 bits/min) in offline analyses and 94.3±3.8% (54.6±3.8 bits/min) in online experiments. Additionally, the proposed feature extraction method was applied to the BCI competition datasets and compared with most of the state-of-the-art algorithms. The results demonstrated that the accuracy (ITR) of the proposed method was 100% (8.9 bits/min) and 97% (8.5 bits/min) on dataset II from BCI-competition II and dataset II from BCI-competition III, respectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2023.3313260

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 12

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. A. Barachant and M. Congedo, ''A plug & play P300 BCI using information geometry,'' pp. 1-9, 2014, arXiv:1409.0107, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1409.0107. · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Aghili, S. N., & Erfanian, A.
Affiliations
Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2023
Volume
11
Pages
98633-98652
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386562080
Cited by
12
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
P300 speller, event-related potentials, brain-computer interface, Riemannian geometry, symmetric positive definite matrices, convolutional neural networks, feature extraction, information transfer rate, fatigue, BCI competition datasets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review