A Plug&Play P300 BCI Using Information Geometry
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a new classification methods for Event Related Potentials (ERP) based on an Information geometry framework. Through a new estimation of covariance matrices, this work extend the use of Riemannian geometry, which was previously limited to SMR-based BCI, to the problem of classification of ERPs. As compared to the state-of-the-art, this new method increases performance, reduces the number of data needed for the calibration and features good generalisation across sessions and subjects. This method is illustrated on data recorded with the P300-based game brain invaders. Finally, an online and adaptive implementation is described, where the BCI is initialized with generic parameters derived from a database and continuously adapt to the individual, allowing the user to play the game without any calibration while keeping a high accuracy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
xDAWN+RG features perform well cross-subject but lack obvious physiological interpretation.
“xDAWN spatial filtering [13] with Riemannian geometry (xDAWN+RG) features also perform well cross-subject [14], [15] but lack obvious physiological interpretation [8].”
From ERP-XTTN: interpretable prototype-guided cross-attention for cross-subject ERP classification (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The main discriminative information of ERP trials is carried temporally rather than spatially.
“However, the main discriminative information of ERP trials is carried temporally rather than spatially.”
From Transfer Learning for Brain–Computer Interfaces: A Euclidean Space Data Alignment Approach (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
Barachant and Congedo proposed augmenting ERP trials by concatenating the mean of the ERP trials to each trial so that their covariance matrices encode temporal information.
“So Barachant and Congedo [2] proposed a novel approach to augment the ERP trials so that their covariance matrices can also encode the temporal information.”
From Transfer Learning for Brain–Computer Interfaces: A Euclidean Space Data Alignment Approach (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces
Lotte, F., Congedo, M., Lécuyer, A., Lamarche, F., & Arnaldi, B. (2007) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/r01 · Cited by 2,665 · see citing works
Self-citationRenard, Y., Lotte, F., Gibert, G., Congedo, M., Maby, E., Delannoy, V., Bertrand, O., & Lécuyer, A. (2010) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.19.1.35 · Cited by 830 · see citing works
Self-citationClassification of covariance matrices using a Riemannian-based kernel for BCI applications
Barachant, A., Bonnet, S., Congedo, M., & Jutten, C. (2013) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2012.12.039 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces
Lawhern, V. J., Solon, A. J., Waytowich, N. R., Gordon, S. M., Hung, C. P., & Lance, B. J. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aace8c · Cited by 5,115 · see citing works
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: A 10 year update
Lotte, F., Bougrain, L., Cichocki, A., Clerc, M., Congedo, M., Rakotomamonjy, A., & Yger, F. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2 · Cited by 2,239 · see citing works
Self-citationTransfer Learning for Brain–Computer Interfaces: A Euclidean Space Data Alignment Approach
He, H., & Wu, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2019.2913914 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
“[2] A. Barachant and M. Congedo, “A plug & play P300 BCI using information geometry,” 2014, arXiv:1409.0107.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRiemannian Approaches in Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Review
Yger, F., Berar, M., & Lotte, F. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2016.2627016 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Transfer Learning: A Riemannian Geometry framework with applications to Brain-Computer Interfaces
Zanini, P., Congedo, M., Jutten, C., Said, S., & Berthoumieu, Y. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2017.2742541 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Self-citationWaytowich, N. R., Lawhern, V. J., Bohannon, A. W., Ball, K. R., & Lance, B. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00430 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
EEG-Based User Reaction Time Estimation Using Riemannian Geometry Features
Wu, D., Lance, B. J., Lawhern, V. J., Gordon, S., Jung, T.-P., & Lin, C.-T. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2017.2699784 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Borra, D., Fantozzi, S., & Magosso, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.655840 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“In particular, this solution included a combination of xDAWN spatial filtering (Rivet et al., 2009; Barachant and Congedo, 2014), Riemannian Geometry (Barachant et al., 2012 was adopted also with SOA algorithms to perform post-hoc hyper-parameter evaluation. ii.”
MethodClassification of error-related potentials evoked during stroke rehabilitation training
Kumar, A., Pirogova, E., Mahmoud, S. S., & Fang, Q. (2021) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac1d32 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Aghili, S. N., & Erfanian, A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3313260 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
ERP-XTTN: interpretable prototype-guided cross-attention for cross-subject ERP classification
Genevier Wyman, C., & Hirshfield, L. (2026) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ae9f95
“…patterns, but their interpretability rests on a fixed decision rule rather than trial-specific evidence for each classification. xDAWN spatial filtering [13] with Riemannian geometry (xDAWN + RG) features also perform well cross-subject [14, 15] but lack obvious physiological interpretation [8].”
- Authors
- Barachant, A., & Congedo, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2014
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1409.0107
- OpenAlex
- W1612549465
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- P300, event-related potentials, brain-computer interface, information geometry, Riemannian geometry, covariance matrix estimation, calibration-free BCI, online learning, cross-session generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
