Cited by 8Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsArtificial Intelligence in GamesArtificial Intelligence Applications

Human strategy learning-based multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for online team sports game

Open access
Lee, Seongbeen, Lee, Gyuhyuk, Kim, Wongyeom, Kim, Junoh, Park, Jisun, Cho, Kyungeun·2025·IEEE Access

Abstract

In 3 vs. 3 online basketball games, finite state machine (FSM)-based Game artificial intelligence (AI) has traditionally been employed. However, limitations such as repetitive behavior patterns and challenges in maintaining systems during redesigns have led to increased research into reinforcement learning-based AI. This shift aims to address the shortcomings of FSM-based approaches. Nevertheless, applying multi-agent reinforcement learning-based AI in commercial online basketball games presents significant challenges, particularly in ensuring real-time processing, which requires efficient methods for managing observational data. In addition, the stochastic nature of action selection in reinforcement learning complicates the accurate learning of behaviors through explicit decision data. Moreover, reinforcement learning, which self-optimizes through exploration and develops its own rules, struggles to mimic human-like behavior patterns that follow predefined strategies in Sports Game. This study introduces a human strategy-based reinforcement learning method designed to address these challenges and replicate human gameplay that adheres to human-defined strategies. The learning of human strategies is enhanced using Ray for the real-time processing of observational data and a multi-phase reward system that distinctly defines rewards based on specific objectives. Furthermore, the proposed method enables real-time, strategy-based action guidance through a Human Strategy AI trained…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2025.3531435

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLMs such as GPT-4, PaLM, Claude, and LLaMA are pre-trained on massive text corpora using self-supervised objectives and fine-tuned using techniques such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).

    “LLMs such as GPT-4 [81], PaLM [82], Claude https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-3-5-sonnet, and LLaMA [121] are pre-trained on massive text corpora using self-supervised objectives and fine-tuned using techniques such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) [130], [131].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, S., Lee, G., Kim, W., Kim, J., Park, J., & Cho, K.
Affiliations
Dongguk University (KR)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2025
Volume
13
Pages
15437-15452
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406610611
Cited by
7
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (IITP-2024-RS-2023-00254592)
  • Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (R2022020003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
multi-agent deep reinforcement learning, game AI, rays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review