The Role of Country- and Firm-Level Factors in Determining Firms’ Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance: A Machine Learning Approach
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study is to apply machine learning techniques to predict firms' environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. We employed ten supervised machine learning models—decision tree, stochastic gradient descent, random forest, adaptive boosting, extra trees, extreme gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbors, multiple linear regression, transformer-based regression, and multi-layer perceptron —and evaluated their effectiveness in ESG prediction. The analysis covers global firms and incorporates seven firm-specific characteristics and country-level macroeconomic variables. Using a sample of 19,476 observations from 2010 to 2018 from publicly listed firms across 53 countries, our findings indicate that random forest regressor exhibit the highest predictive power, with the lowest root mean square error. For the random forests regressor, the coefficient of determination (R2) was 30% and the mean absolute error (MAE) was 1.52. The second-best predictive model was the extra-trees regressor with an R2value of 27% and an MAE of 1.56. In our analysis, the multiple regression model had the lowest R2value of 14%, with an MAE value of 1.70. We also analyzed the feature importance of the random forests regressor, identifying firm size, capital expenditure, and cash holdings as the top three predictors of ESG performance. Additionally, we used the double-debiased machine learning technique to assess causal inference in feature importance, revealing capital expenditure, political stability, and leverage as the most influential factors in ESG predictions. Although the ranking of feature importance varies between the causal inference and predictive models, the key factors identified by both techniques largely align and are consistent with the significance of the coefficients from the multiple regression model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ESG performance is characterized by complex, non-linear relationships that are more accurately captured by tree-based AI models than by classical regression.
“Abdelfattah et al. [36] confirms on a global scale that ESG performance is characterized by complex, non-linear relationships that are more accurately captured by tree-based AI models than by classical regression”
From Artificial Intelligence in Managerial Decision-Making for Sustainable Business Models: A Systematic Literature Review (2026) · cites this paper as Abdelfattah et al. [36]
The relationships between ESG performance and input variables are non-linear, making tree-based algorithms more suitable than traditional statistical approaches.
“The results confirm that the relationships between ESG performance and input variables are non-linear, making tree-based algorithms more suitable than traditional statistical approaches.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Managerial Decision-Making for Sustainable Business Models: A Systematic Literature Review (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
The random forest regressor achieved R2=0.30, MAE=1.52, and RMSE=1.89 for predicting ESG performance, outperforming classical multiple linear regression (R2=0.14; MAE=1.70).
“The best-performing AI model was the random forest regressor, which achieved a coefficient of determination of R 2 = 0.30, MAE = 1.52, and RMSE = 1.89, representing a substantial improvement over classical multiple linear regression (R 2 = 0.14; MAE = 1.70).”
From Artificial Intelligence in Managerial Decision-Making for Sustainable Business Models: A Systematic Literature Review (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Abdelfattah, E., Malik, M., & Muhammad Ishraque Osman, S.
- Affiliations
- Sacred Heart University (US)
- Department of Finance, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT, USA
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 104137-104158
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4411270846
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Financial Management
- Keywords
- ESG performance, environmental, social and governance, firm-level determinants, random forest, extra trees, feature importance, double/debiased machine learning, political stability, capital expenditure, cash holdings, firm size, leverage, listed companies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review