Cited by 366Emotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech Recognition and SynthesisDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Sparse Autoencoder-Based Feature Transfer Learning for Speech Emotion Recognition

Open access
Deng, Jun, Zhang, Zixing, Marchi, Erik, Schuller, Bjorn·2013·2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction

Abstract

In speech emotion recognition, training and test data used for system development usually tend to fit each other perfectly, but further 'similar' data may be available. Transfer learning helps to exploit such similar data for training despite the inherent dissimilarities in order to boost a recogniser's performance. In this context, this paper presents a sparse auto encoder method for feature transfer learning for speech emotion recognition. In our proposed method, a common emotion-specific mapping rule is learnt from a small set of labelled data in a target domain. Then, newly reconstructed data are obtained by applying this rule on the emotion-specific data in a different domain. The experimental results evaluated on six standard databases show that our approach significantly improves the performance relative to learning each source domain independently.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/acii.2013.90

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple studies have shown that transfer learning can improve model accuracy by leveraging additional sources of related knowledge.

    “Multiple studies have shown that transfer learning can improve model accuracy by leveraging additional sources of related knowledge (e.g., from other paralinguistic tasks [136], various standard databases [137], and different affect representations [135]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deng, J., Zhang, Z., Marchi, E., & Schuller, B.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Venue
2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-09
Pages
511-516
ISSN
2156-8103 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050752817
Cited by
366
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10
FWCI
18.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
speech emotion recognition, sparse autoencoders, cross-domain transfer, domain adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review