Cited by 243Emotion and Mood RecognitionSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments

Open access
Rouast, Philipp V., Adam, Marc T. P., Chiong, Raymond·2021·IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing

Abstract

Automatic human affect recognition is a key step towards more natural human-computer interaction. Recent trends include recognition in the wild using a fusion of audiovisual and physiological sensors, a challenging setting for conventional machine learning algorithms. Since 2010, novel deep learning algorithms have been applied increasingly in this field. In this paper, we review the literature on human affect recognition between 2010 and 2017, with a special focus on approaches using deep neural networks. By classifying a total of 950 studies according to their usage of shallow or deep architectures, we are able to show a trend towards deep learning. Reviewing a subset of 233 studies that employ deep neural networks, we comprehensively quantify their applications in this field. We find that deep learning is used for learning of (i) spatial feature representations, (ii) temporal feature representations, and (iii) joint feature representations for multimodal sensor data. Exemplary state-of-the-art architectures illustrate the progress. Our findings show the role deep architectures will play in human affect recognition, and can serve as a reference point for researchers working on related applications.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review classifies 950 human affect recognition studies from 2010–2017 and identifies a clear trend toward deep learning, with 233 deep-learning studies reviewed in detail. Deep networks are used mainly for spatial, temporal, and joint multimodal feature representations, generally improving accuracy but still constrained by limited labeled data.

Key findings

  • Of 950 studies, deep learning rose from 1–2 studies per year to 52% of studies in 2017, a 119% average year-on-year increase; overall affect recognition studies increased 25% year-on-year on average between 2010 and 2016.
  • Among 233 deep-learning studies, 173 learned spatial features, 105 temporal features, and 21 joint multimodal features; FER was most common (158 studies), followed by SER (82) and EEG (18).
  • Deep features outperformed handcrafted features in 93% of 103 spatial comparisons, 92% of 73 temporal comparisons, and 95% of 150 shallow-vs-deep comparisons; however, only 69% of 16 joint-feature comparisons found feature-level fusion superior to decision fusion.
  • Since 2015, all winning entries at the reviewed affect recognition competitions used deep learning; AFEW accuracy rose from 41.0% in 2013 to 60.3% in 2017.

Methods

  • Two-stage literature search of studies on human affect recognition since 2010 in the ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink, and Web of Science.
  • Stage 1 yielded 950 studies, manually classified by use of shallow or deep models; Stage 2 focused on 233 deep-learning studies, classified by modality and by whether deep learning learned spatial, temporal, or joint feature representations.
  • Scope was restricted to sensor data from cues directly given by the human body (facial expressions, movement, speech, physiology); generic images/videos, music, and text were excluded, as were facial action unit and facial feature point detection, and SER was restricted to paralinguistic content.

Limitations

  • The paper states that recognition accuracies across studies cannot be fairly compared because of differing training/test sets and evaluation statistics; it also notes unreliable ground truth, imbalanced datasets, and limited labeled data as major obstacles.
  • The paper states that no consensus exists between categorical and dimensional affect representations, and that most reviewed studies still rely on categorical models (82%).
  • Evident from the text: the search contains only partial 2017 data and excludes 2017 from the trend analysis; classification of studies was manual; and the review’s scope exclusions limit generalization to affect communicated through non-body cues such as generic images, music, or text.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/taffc.2018.2890471

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 161 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation
    § 2.4 Towards learning deep models of affect · p. 5

    Deep learning is used for learning temporal feature representations in human affect recognition.

    “Learning temporal feature representations. To learn representations of the temporal dynamics found in audio [63], sequences of images [64], and physiological measurements [55], DNNs and especially RNNs are successfully applied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [63] [63] S. Mirsamadi, E. Barsoum, and C. Zhang, 'Automatic speech emotion recognition using recurrent neural networks with local attention,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 2227-2231. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [64] [64] D. H. Kim, W. Baddar, J. Jang, and Y. M. Ro, 'Multi-objective based spatio-temporal feature representation learning robust to expression intensity variations for facial expression recognition,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , 2017. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [55] [55] X. Li, D. Song, P. Zhang, G. Yu, Y. Hou, and B. Hu, 'Emotion recognition from multi-channel eeg data through convolutional recurrent neural network,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Bioinf. and Biomed. , 2016, pp. 352-359. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingreasoning
    § 3.1 Learning spatial feature representations · p. 6

    CNNs are the most popular approach for learning spatial features.

    “Hence, CNNs are the most popular approach for learning spatial features (see Fig. 2, S2a-S2e).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 6

    93% of studies reporting direct comparisons find that deep spatial features outperform handcrafted spatial features for FER.

    “As a result, 93% of studies reporting direct comparisons find that deep spatial features outperform handcrafted spatial features for FER.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5

    Considering physiological signals, DNNs are most frequently applied in studies based on electroencephalography (EEG).

    “Considering physiological signals, DNNs are most frequently applied in studies based on electroencephalography (EEG).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given
    § 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 9

    94% of studies reporting comparisons with handcrafted approaches find that deep temporal features perform better for FER.

    “With DNNs, temporal modeling capabilities in FER can further be improved: 94% of studies reporting comparisons with handcrafted approaches find that deep temporal features perform better for FER.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 47
  • May combine two claims. 66
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5

    Individual studies often use multiple modalities or apply deep learning in more than one way.

    “Note that individual studies often use multiple modalities or apply deep learning in more than one way.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 6

    The review discusses the application of deep learning across 141 studies to learn spatial features from images.

    “In this section, we discuss the application of deep learning across 141 studies to learn spatial features from images.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3.1.4 Takeaways for spatial feature learning · p. 9

    Deep spatial features lead to higher accuracies than handcrafted spatial features; out of 103 studies that reported comparisons, 93% support this finding.

    “Deep spatial features lead to higher accuracies than handcrafted spatial features. Out of 103 studies that reported comparisons, 93% support this finding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5

    Deep learning has gained considerable attention in human affect recognition since 2010, being employed in 52% of studies in 2017, with a 119% average year-on-year increase in the number of published studies.

    “Deep learning has gained considerable attention in this field since 2010: Up from one to two studies per year, it is being employed in 52% of studies in 2017a 119% average year-on-year increase in the number of published studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5

    Stage 1 of the literature search yielded a total of 950 studies on human affect recognition.

    “Stage 1 of our search yielded a total of 950 studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 6

    For speech emotion recognition, learning temporal feature representations with DNNs is an active research area.

    “For SER in particular, learning of temporal feature representations with DNNs is an active research area.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5

    The application of DNNs for facial expression recognition has attracted the most attention in the literature, featured in almost twice as many studies compared to speech emotion recognition, which is featured second most frequently.

    “From Table 1, it is apparent that the application of DNNs for FER has attracted the most attention in the literature, featured in almost twice as many studies compared to SER, which is featured second most frequently.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5

    Between 2010 and 2016, the number of studies on human affect recognition increased overall, with an average year-on-year increase of 25%.

    “Between 2010 and 2016 9 , there was an overall increase in the number of studies on human affect recognition (25% year-on-year increase on average).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5

    Stage 2 of the review focused exclusively on 233 studies that use deep learning for affect recognition.

    “In Stage 2, we focus exclusively on the 233 studies found in our review that use deep learning for affect recognition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 6

    Learning joint feature representations for early feature fusion across different modalities is a less active but developing application area of DNNs in human affect recognition.

    “A less active, but developing application area of DNNs in human affect recognition is learning joint feature representations for the purpose of early feature fusion across different modalities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 8

    57% of reviewed studies report using dropout for fully-connected layers, and 12% report using it for convolutional layers.

    “It is widely used in the reviewed studies-57% report using dropout for fullyconnected layers, and 12% report using it for convolutional layers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7

    Face cropping is standard practice and reported to increase model accuracy (e.g., from 54% to 72% in [94]).

    “Face cropping is standard practice, and reported to increase model accuracy (e.g., from 54% to 72% in [94]; see also [15]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [94] [94] A. T. Lopes, E. de Aguiar, A. F. De Souza, and T. OliveiraSantos, 'Facial expression recognition with convolutional neural networks: Coping with few data and the training sample order,' Pattern Recognit. , vol. 61, pp. 610-628, 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [15] [15] J. Li, S. Roy, J. Feng, and T. Sim, 'Happiness level prediction with sequential inputs via multiple regressions,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 487-493. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7

    Most of these studies use additional datasets and transfer learning to avoid overfitting.

    “Most of these studies use additional datasets and transfer learning to avoid overfitting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8

    Most recent models use pre-defined sets of LLDs for spatial modeling.

    “Most recent models use pre-defined sets of LLDs for spatial modeling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7

    Most frequently chosen existing architectures are VGG Net (23 studies) and AlexNet (18 studies).

    “Most frequently chosen are VGG Net [80] (23 studies) and AlexNet [36] (18 studies).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [80] [80] K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, 'Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. , 2014. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [36] [36] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, 'Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. NIPS , vol. 25, 2012, pp. 1097-1105. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8

    Li et al. [125] used a six-layer DNN to learn frame-level features from concatenated MFCCs of a sliding context window, yielding an accuracy improvement of more than 10% over GMMs.

    “For example, Li et al. [125] used a six-layer DNN to learn frame-level features from concatenated MFCCs of a sliding context window. In their experiments, this yielded an accuracy improvement of more than 10% over GMMs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [125] [125] L. Li, Y. Zhao, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, F. Wang, I. Gonzalez, E. Valentin, and H. Sahli, 'Hybrid deep neural network-hidden markov model (dnn-hmm) based speech emotion recognition,' in Proc. ACII , 2013, pp. 312-317. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 8

    Khorrami et al. [87] reported an increase in accuracy of 2.5% after applying dropout to fully-connected layers.

    “Khorrami et al. [87] reported an increase in accuracy of 2.5% after applying dropout to fully-connected layers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [87] [87] P. Khorrami, T. Paine, and T. Huang, 'Do deep neural networks learn facial action units when doing expression recognition?' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vision , 2015, pp. 19-27. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 8

    Data augmentation artificially increases the number of available examples or training epochs by a factor typically between 10 and 30, and up to 300.

    “This way, researchers artificially increase the number of available examples or training epochs by a factor typically between 10 and 30 [88], [113], [114], and up to 300 [115].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [88] [88] H. Jung, S. Lee, J. Yim, S. Park, and J. Kim, 'Joint fine-tuning in deep neural networks for facial expression recognition,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vision , 2015, pp. 2983-2991. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [113] [113] Y. Guo, D. Tao, J. Yu, H. Xiong, Y. Li, and D. Tao, 'Deep neural networks with relativity learning for facial expression recognition,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimedia Expo Workshops , 2016, pp. 1-6. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [114] [114] Y. Cai, W. Zheng, T. Zhang, Q. Li, Z. Cui, and J. Ye, 'Video based emotion recognition using cnn and brnn,' in Proc. Chin. Conf. Pattern Recognition , 2016, pp. 679-691. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8

    Some studies considered using known architectures from object recognition and regarded it as necessary to pre-train these larger models on ImageNet to avoid overfitting the relatively few labeled examples.

    “Some considered using known architectures from object recognition [132], [85], [127]. Here, the authors regarded it as necessary to pre-train these larger models on the ImageNet database to avoid overfitting the relatively few labeled examples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [132] [132] C.-T. Ho, Y.-H. Lin, and J.-L. Wu, 'Emotion prediction from usergenerated videos by emotion wheel guided deep learning,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. , 2016, pp. 3-12. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [85] [85] S. Zhang, S. Zhang, T. Huang, W. Gao, and Q. Tian, 'Learning affective features with a hybrid deep model for audio-visual emotion recognition,' IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. , 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [127] [127] A. M. Badshah, J. Ahmad, N. Rahim, and S. W. Baik, 'Speech emotion recognition from spectrograms with deep convolutional neural network,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Platform Technol. Serv. , 2017, pp. 1-5. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9

    Dropout is applied in fully-connected layers in 43% of studies and in convolutional layers in 14% of studies.

    “Dropout is applied in fullyconnected (reported in 43% of studies, e.g., [135]) and convolutional layers (14% of studies, e.g., [108]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [135] [135] Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, F. Weninger, and B. Schuller, 'Multi-task deep neural network with shared hidden layers: Breaking down the wall between emotion representations,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 4990-4994. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.3 Learning spatial features from physiology · p. 9

    All four identified studies achieved accuracy improvements over handcrafted approaches, but a lack of training data was also mentioned.

    “All achieved accuracy improvements over handcrafted approaches, but a lack of training data was also mentioned [145], [146].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [145] [145] M. Yanagimoto and C. Sugimoto, 'Recognition of persisting emotional valence from eeg using convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Workshop Computat. Intell. Appl. , 2016, pp. 27-32. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [146] [146] T. Zhang, W. Zheng, Z. Cui, Y. Zong, and Y. Li, 'Spatial-temporal recurrent neural network for emotion recognition,' IEEE Trans. Cybern. , 2017. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10

    Zhang et al. [148] and Ranganathan et al. [149] used fully-connected DBN models to learn from aggregated facial feature point trajectories, both improving recognition accuracies over shallow aggregation strategies.

    “For example, Zhang et al. [148] and Ranganathan et al. [149] used fully-connected DBN models to learn from aggregated facial feature point trajectories, both improving recognition accuracies over shallow aggregation strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [148] [148] B. Zhang, G. Essl, and E. Mower Provost, 'Automatic recognition of self-reported and perceived emotion: Does joint modeling help?' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 217-224. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [149] [149] H. Ranganathan, S. Chakraborty, and S. Panchanathan, 'Multimodal emotion recognition using deep learning architectures,' in Proc. Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vision , 2016, pp. 1-9. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8

    Most studies chose custom architectures of one to three convolutional layers and one to three fully-connected layers for this task.

    “Most studies chose custom architectures of one to three convolutional layers and one to three fully-connected layers for this task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.3 Learning spatial features from physiology · p. 9

    Yanagimoto and Sugimoto [145] divided raw 16-channel EEG data into 1s segments and used a seven-layer CNN with 10 ms kernels on the first layer, leading to accuracy improvements of over 20%.

    “For example, Yanagimoto and Sugimoto [145] divided the raw 16-channel EEG data into 1s segments and used a seven-layer CNN with 10 ms kernels on the first layer, leading to accuracy improvements of over 20%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [145] [145] M. Yanagimoto and C. Sugimoto, 'Recognition of persisting emotional valence from eeg using convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Workshop Computat. Intell. Appl. , 2016, pp. 27-32. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9

    SoundNet, a 1D CNN trained with unlabeled video, has been shown to perform well in SER even without fine-tuning, and was featured in a challenge-winning submission.

    “SoundNet [138], a 1D CNN trained with unlabeled video, has been shown to perform well in SER even without fine-tuning [139], and was featured in a challenge-winning submission [17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [138] [138] Y. Aytar, C. Vondrick, and A. Torralba, 'Soundnet: Learning sound representations from unlabeled video,' in Proc. NIPS , 2016. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [139] [139] S. Pini, O. B. Ahmed, M. Cornia, L. Baraldi, R. Cucchiara, and B. Huet, 'Modeling multimodal cues in a deep learning-based framework for emotion recognition in the wild,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. ACM, 2017, pp. 536-543. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17] [17] S. Chen, Q. Jin, J. Zhao, and S. Wang, 'Multimodal multi-task learning for dimensional and continuous emotion recognition,' in Proc. AVEC , 2017, pp. 19-26. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9

    Bertero et al. [134] proposed one convolutional layer with 25 ms kernels, which achieved a 3% accuracy improvement over LLDs.

    “Bertero et al. [134] proposed one convolutional layer with 25 ms kernels, which achieved a 3% accuracy improvement over LLDs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [134] [134] D. Bertero and P. Fung, 'A first look into a convolutional neural network for speech emotion detection,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 5115-5119. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9

    Trigeorgis et al. [54] were the first to use CNNs for raw waveform in SER; they used two convolutional layers for spatial modeling, almost doubling ground truth correlation over LLDs for arousal, and slightly improving for valence.

    “Trigeorgis et al. [54] were the first to do so: They used two convolutional layers for spatial modeling, almost doubling ground truth correlation over LLDs for arousal, and slightly improving for valence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54] [54] G. Trigeorgis, F. Ringeval, R. Brueckner, E. Marchi, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'Adieu features? end-to-end speech emotion recognition using a deep convolutional recurrent network,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2016, pp. 5200-5204. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8

    Without any feature engineering, Mirsamadi et al. were able to learn features similar to LLDs from the raw spectral representation of individual audio frames at 25 ms, leading to an accuracy increase of 4%.

    “Without any feature engineering, they were able to learn features similar to LLDs from the raw spectral representation of individual audio frames at 25 ms, leading to an accuracy increase of 4%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9

    Data augmentation to artificially increase the dataset size is used less often than for FER; notable examples include addition of Gaussian noise, different sampling frequencies, and modified playback speed.

    “Data augmentation to artificially increase the dataset size is used less often than for FER; notable examples include the addition of Gaussian noise [129], different sampling frequencies [130], and modified playback speed [142].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [129] [129] M. W¨ ollmer, M. Kaiser, F. Eyben, B. Schuller, and G. Rigoll, 'Lstm-modeling of continuous emotions in an audiovisual affect recognition framework,' Image Vision Comput. , vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 153-163, 2013. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [130] [130] H. M. Fayek, M. Lech, and L. Cavedon, 'Towards real-time speech emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Signal Process. Commun. Syst. , 2015, pp. 1-5. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [142] [142] Z. Aldeneh and E. M. Provost, 'Using regional saliency for speech emotion recognition,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11

    The number of features per utterance varies from several hundred to several thousand, depending on the employed LLDs and HSFs.

    “This number varies from several hundred [157] to several thousand [158], [123], depending on the employed LLDs and HSFs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [157] [157] B. Schuller, S. Steidl, and A. Batliner, 'The interspeech 2009 emotion challenge,' in Proc. INTERSPEECH , 2009. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [158] [158] B. W. Schuller, S. Steidl, A. Batliner, E. N¨ oth, A. Vinciarelli, F. Burkhardt, R. Van Son, F. Weninger, F. Eyben, T. Bocklet et al. , 'The interspeech 2012 speaker trait challenge,' in Proc. INTERSPEECH , 2012, pp. 254-257. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [123] [123] B. Schuller, S. Steidl, A. Batliner, A. Vinciarelli, K. Scherer, F. Ringeval, M. Chetouani, F. Weninger, F. Eyben, E. Marchi et al. , 'The interspeech 2013 computational paralinguistics challenge,' in Proc. INTERSPEECH , 2013. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 11

    Ringeval et al. [65] found that while the given physiological signal has lower predictive power than audiovisual signals, both are complementary.

    “They found that while the given physiological signal has lower predictive power than audiovisual signals, both are complementary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65] [65] F. Ringeval, F. Eyben, E. Kroupi, A. Yuce, J.-P. Thiran, T. Ebrahimi, D. Lalanne, and B. Schuller, 'Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data,' Pattern Recognit. Lett. , vol. 66, pp. 22-30, 2015. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 11

    As highlighted in Table 3, approach T1 is the primary application of DNNs for feature learning from physiological data.

    “As highlighted in Table 3, approach T1 is the primary application of DNNs for feature learning from physiological data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11

    One study suggested that a smaller window size (2s) could be the best choice.

    “One study suggested that a smaller window size (2s) could be the best choice [65].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65] [65] F. Ringeval, F. Eyben, E. Kroupi, A. Yuce, J.-P. Thiran, T. Ebrahimi, D. Lalanne, and B. Schuller, 'Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data,' Pattern Recognit. Lett. , vol. 66, pp. 22-30, 2015. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11

    Since 2016, eight studies have explored combining deep spatial features and RNN-based temporal feature learning.

    “Since 2016, eight studies have explored combining deep spatial features and RNN-based temporal feature learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 11

    Yin et al. [171] used stacked autoencoders to learn high-level representations from various peripheral sensors including skin temperature and blood volume pressure, improving the state-of-the-art by 5%.

    “Yin et al. [171] used stacked autoencoders (SAEs) to learn high-level representations from various peripheral sensors including skin temperature and blood volume pressure, improving the state-of-the-art by 5%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [171] [171] Z. Yin, M. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Yang, and J. Zhang, 'Recognition of emotions using multimodal physiological signals and an ensemble deep learning model,' Comput. Meth. Programs Biomed. , vol. 140, pp. 93-110, 2017. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11

    Mirsamadi et al. [63] found that model performance is slightly lower with joint learning of both short-term spatial features and temporal context on the IEMOCAP dataset, while both improve model performance when applied independently.

    “Mirsamadi et al. [63] found that model performance is slightly lower with joint learning of both short-term spatial features and temporal context on the IEMOCAP dataset [165], while both improve model performance when applied independently.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [63] [63] S. Mirsamadi, E. Barsoum, and C. Zhang, 'Automatic speech emotion recognition using recurrent neural networks with local attention,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 2227-2231. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [165] [165] C. Busso, M. Bulut, C.-C. Lee, A. Kazemzadeh, E. Mower, S. Kim, J. N. Chang, S. Lee, and S. S. Narayanan, 'Iemocap: Interactive emotional dyadic motion capture database,' Language Resources Eval. , vol. 42, no. 4, p. 335, 2008. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11

    Studies aiming to reduce feature space dimensionality with deep learning almost exclusively use fully-connected DNNs, consisting of two to four hidden layers.

    “Studies aiming to reduce feature space dimensionality with deep learning almost exclusively use fully-connected DNNs, consisting of two to four hidden layers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11

    Applications of similar architectures based on the raw waveform have also been attempted, showing that end-to-end learning can outperform shallow models.

    “Applications of similar architectures based on the raw waveform have also been attempted [54], [108], showing that end-to-end learning can outperform shallow models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [54] [54] G. Trigeorgis, F. Ringeval, R. Brueckner, E. Marchi, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'Adieu features? end-to-end speech emotion recognition using a deep convolutional recurrent network,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2016, pp. 5200-5204. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 14

    DNNs are applied for learning of spatial feature representations, temporal feature representations, and joint feature representations for multimodal data.

    “They are applied for learning of (i) spatial feature representations, (ii) temporal feature representations, and (iii) joint feature representations for multimodal data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 14

    Both AffectNet and EmotioNet are large web-based databases, each at around 1M labeled images.

    “Both AffectNet and EmotioNet are large web-based databases, each at around 1M labeled images.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3.2.5 Takeaways for temporal feature learning · p. 12

    Deep temporal features lead to higher accuracies than handcrafted temporal features, with 92% of 73 studies that reported comparisons supporting this finding.

    “Deep temporal features lead to higher accuracies than handcrafted temporal features. Out of 73 studies that reported comparisons, 92% support this finding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13

    Overall, 190 studies use categorical models (82%), 37 studies use dimensional models (16%), and 6 use both (2.6%).

    “Overall, 190 studies use categorical models (82%), 37 studies use dimensional models (16%), and only 6 use both (2.6%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13

    Of the 77 public databases used in the reviewed studies, 58 use categorical models (75%), 14 use dimensional models (18%), and 4 use both (5.2%).

    “Of the 77 public databases used in the studies covered in our review, 58 use categorical models (75%), 14 use dimensional models (18%), and only 4 use both (5.2%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 3.3.3 Takeaways for joint feature learning · p. 13

    To date, there is no consensus whether feature-level fusion with deep learning leads to superior accuracy over simple decision fusion, with only 69% of 16 studies that reported comparisons finding that it does.

    “To date, there is no consensus whether feature-level fusion with deep learning leads to superior accuracy over simple decision fusion. Out of 16 studies that reported comparisons, only 69% find that it does.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 14

    AffectNet includes both dimensional and categorical labels.

    “Notably, AffectNet includes both dimensional and categorical labels, encouraging studies to bridge the gap between affect representations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 14

    The AUTOENCODER dataset is the largest face video dataset with 6.5M examples; it contains only 2777 labeled examples and is thus largely unlabeled.

    “The AUTOENCODER dataset is the largest face video dataset with 6.5M examples; the dataset contains only 2777 labeled examples and is thus largely unlabeled.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.2.5 Takeaways for temporal feature learning · p. 12

    Since 2015, there are studies using deep learning for both spatial and temporal feature learning.

    “Since 2015, there are studies using deep learning for both spatial and temporal feature learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13

    At this stage, the number of examples per dataset does not show a clear upward trend, and only few deep learning studies covered in the review investigate both categorical and dimensional models.

    “Unfortunately, at this stage, the number of examples per dataset does not see a clear upward trend yet and only few deep learning studies covered in our review investigate both types of models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 14

    Compared to older databases, databases published in 2016 and 2017 contain many more examples, made possible by (semi-)automating the labeling process or providing unlabeled examples.

    “Compared to older databases, they contain many more examples, which is made possible by (semi-)automating the labeling process, or providing unlabeled examples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13

    The visual modality is featured most frequently in the databases.

    “As expected from previous findings, the visual modality is featured most frequently.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13

    Unlabeled databases are used exclusively for transfer learning.

    “Unlabeled databases are used exclusively for transfer learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.3 Learning joint feature representations · p. 12

    The review reports on the approaches of 21 studies that use deep learning for joint feature learning from multimodal data.

    “Here, we report on the approaches of 21 studies that use deep learning for joint feature learning from multimodal data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning
    § 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13

    More recent databases such as FER2013 and SFEW2 tend to contain more examples than older databases such as JAFFE and CK+.

    “Here, more recent databases such as FER2013 and SFEW2 tend to contain more examples than older databases such as JAFFE and CK+-this is made possible by resorting to sources like the web and semi-automatic labeling procedures as opposed to manual annotation of data collected in a laboratory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3.3.3 Takeaways for joint feature learning · p. 13

    Dimensional models of affect are used in 10% of spatial feature learning studies, 30% of temporal feature learning studies, and 52% of studies on joint feature learning.

    “While dimensional models of affect are only used in 10% of spatial and 30% of temporal feature learning studies, they are employed in 52% of studies on joint feature learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    Dimensional models are already employed in 52% of joint feature learning studies and 30% of temporal feature learning studies.

    “This already becomes apparent in joint feature learning and to some extent in temporal feature learning, where dimensional models are already employed in 52% and 30% of the reviewed studies, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    The majority of studies still rely on categorical models of affect (82%), particularly in spatial feature learning (92%).

    “As can be seen in our review, the majority of studies still rely on categorical models of affect (82%), particularly in spatial feature learning (92%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    While handcrafted features are typically outperformed by DNN-learned features in direct comparison, some challenge-winning models rely on hybrid architectures that take advantage of complementarities between the two.

    “While they are typically outperformed by DNN-learned features in direct comparison, some challenge-winning models rely on hybrid architectures that can take advantage of complementarities between the two [152], [18].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [152] [152] J. Yan, W. Zheng, Z. Cui, C. Tang, T. Zhang, Y. Zong, and N. Sun, 'Multi-clue fusion for emotion recognition in the wild,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 458-463. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18] [18] K. Brady, Y. Gwon, P. Khorrami, E. Godoy, W. Campbell, C. Dagli, and T. S. Huang, 'Multi-modal audio, video and physiological sensor learning for continuous emotion prediction,' in Proc. AVEC , 2016, pp. 97-104. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 6

    Mehrabian posited that 55% of the emotion conveyed in a message is perceived visually.

    “Mehrabian [71] famously posited that 55% of the emotion conveyed in a message is perceived visually.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [71] [71] A. Mehrabian, 'Communication without words,' Psychology Today , vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 53-56, 1968. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1

    Multimodal sensor combination improves recognition accuracy and robustness.

    “multimodal sensor combination was found to improve recognition accuracy and robustness [10].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] [10] A. Jaimes and N. Sebe, 'Multimodal human-computer interaction: A survey,' Comput. Vision and Image Understanding , vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 116-134, 2007. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1

    Since 2010, deep learning methods have been applied to affect recognition problems across multiple modalities and have led to improvements in accuracy, including winning performances at EmotiW and AVEC.

    “Since 2010, deep learning methods have been applied to affect recognition problems across multiple modalities and led to improvements in accuracy, including winning performances at EmotiW [14], [15], [16] and AVEC [17], [18], [19].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [14] [14] Y. Fan, X. Lu, D. Li, and Y. Liu, 'Video-based emotion recognition using cnn-rnn and c3d hybrid networks,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 445-450. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [15] [15] J. Li, S. Roy, J. Feng, and T. Sim, 'Happiness level prediction with sequential inputs via multiple regressions,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 487-493. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] [16] B.-K. Kim, H. Lee, J. Roh, and S.-Y. Lee, 'Hierarchical committee of deep cnns with exponentially-weighted decision fusion for static facial expression recognition,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2015, pp. 427-434. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7

    CNNs are well suited to learn spatial features directly from image pixels.

    “CNNs are well suited to learn spatial features directly from image pixels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5

    Since around 2010, deep learning methods have started to fulfill crucial roles in human affect recognition systems and are currently driving most state-of-the-art results in this field.

    “Since around 2010, deep learning methods have started to fulfill crucial roles in human affect recognition systems. Indeed, it is safe to state that they are currently driving most state-of-the-art results in this field.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3.1.4 Takeaways for spatial feature learning · p. 9

    Research strives towards 'deeper' models to achieve higher accuracy but runs into the problem of overfitting, which is the main challenge for current research.

    “To achieve higher accuracy, research strives towards 'deeper' models (Fig. 4 illustrates this for FER), but runs into the problem of overfitting. This is the main challenge for current research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.1.4 Takeaways for spatial feature learning · p. 9

    The full potential of deep learning in affect recognition may not have been seen yet.

    “This suggests that the full potential of deep learning in affect recognition may not have been seen yet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Deep and handcrafted features are complementary in affect recognition.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.4 Towards learning deep models of affect · p. 5

    DNNs are more efficient at learning and representing the given functions, both statistically and regarding human involvement.

    “As discussed in Section 2.1, DNNs are more efficient at learning and representing the given functions, both statistically and regarding human involvement [20].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] [20] Y. Bengio and Y. LeCun, 'Scaling learning algorithms towards ai,' in Large-Scale Kernel Machines , L. Bottou, O. Chapelle, D. DeCoste, and J. Weston, Eds. MIT Press, 2007, pp. 1-41. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 2 DEEP LEARNING FOR AFFECT RECOGNITION · p. 2

    Shallow architectures may not be the most efficient way to approach challenging learning problems such as affect recognition.

    “it has been suggested that shallow architectures may not be the most efficient way to approach challenging learning problems such as affect recognition [20].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] [20] Y. Bengio and Y. LeCun, 'Scaling learning algorithms towards ai,' in Large-Scale Kernel Machines , L. Bottou, O. Chapelle, D. DeCoste, and J. Weston, Eds. MIT Press, 2007, pp. 1-41. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7

    Pre-processing steps reduce the amount of variation the model has to account for, and thus simplify the learning task.

    “These steps reduce the amount of variation the model has to account for, and thus simplify the learning task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 8

    In transfer learning, the goal is to use additional corpora to learn generic visual descriptors that are found to be effective in improving initial model parameters, and thus reduce overfitting.

    “In transfer learning , the goal is to use additional corpora to learn generic visual descriptors that are found to be effective in improving initial model parameters [109], and thus reduce overfitting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [109] [109] A. S. Razavian, H. Azizpour, J. Sullivan, and S. Carlsson, 'Cnn features off-the-shelf: An astounding baseline for recognition,' in Proc. CVPR Workshops , 2014, pp. 806-813. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9

    To avoid overfitting, both dropout and batch normalization can help to achieve better regularization.

    “To avoid overfitting, both dropout [116] and batch normalization [33] can help to achieve better regularization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [116] [116] N. Srivastava, G. E. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov, 'Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting,' J. Mach. Learn. Res. , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1929-1958, 2014. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [33] [33] S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy, 'Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift,' in Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. , vol. 37, 2015, pp. 448-456. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1.3 Learning spatial features from physiology · p. 9

    Another way to learn spatial features from the EEG signal is to reflect it as a 2D map representing the location of the electrodes on the head.

    “Another way to learn spatial features from the EEG signal is to reflect it as a 2D map representing the location of the electrodes on the head [147].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [147] [147] J. Li, Z. Zhang, and H. He, 'Implementation of eeg emotion recognition system based on hierarchical convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Brain Inspired Cogn. Syst. , 2016, pp. 22-33. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10

    RNNs are well-suited to model the temporal variation of frame-level spatial features.

    “The properties of RNNs, as discussed in Section 2.1, make them well-suited to model the temporal variation of frame-level spatial features.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 9

    Appearance features can be extended for spatio-temporal representation by considering a third orthogonal plane.

    “Appearance features can be extended for spatio-temporal representation by considering a third orthogonal plane [96], [99].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [96] [96] M. M. Ghazi and H. K. Ekenel, 'Automatic emotion recognition in the wild using an ensemble of static and dynamic representations,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 514-521. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [99] [99] H. Kaya, F. G¨ urpınar, and A. A. Salah, 'Video-based emotion recognition in the wild using deep transfer learning and score fusion,' Image Vision Comput. , vol. 65, pp. 66-75, 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8

    Mirsamadi et al. [63] pointed out that most commonly used frame-level LLDs in SER can be derived from spectral representations of the raw speech signal.

    “Mirsamadi et al. [63] pointed out that most commonly used frame-level LLDs in SER can be derived from spectral representations of the raw speech signal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] [63] S. Mirsamadi, E. Barsoum, and C. Zhang, 'Automatic speech emotion recognition using recurrent neural networks with local attention,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 2227-2231. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9

    Semi-supervised learning can give access to knowledge contained in unlabeled datasets.

    “Semi-supervised learning can give access to knowledge contained in unlabeled datasets [140].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [140] [140] J. Deng, X. Xu, Z. Zhang, S. Fr¨ uhholz, and B. Schuller, 'Universum autoencoder-based domain adaptation for speech emotion recognition,' IEEE Signal Process. Lett. , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 500-504, 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10

    The RNN approach allows processing long sequences and both sequence-level and continuous frame-level affect recognition on image sequences of arbitrary length.

    “Advantages of this approach include the ability to process long sequences, and the possibility of both sequence-level and continuous frame-level affect recognition on image sequences of arbitrary length.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11

    Since there is no consensus in the literature over a 'universal' handcrafted feature set with superior performance, many recent studies have applied a 'bruteforce' approach, resulting in a large number of features per utterance.

    “Since there is no consensus in the literature over a 'universal' handcrafted feature set with superior performance [121], many recent studies have applied a 'bruteforce' approach, resulting in a large number of features per utterance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [121] [121] F. Eyben, K. R. Scherer, B. W. Schuller, J. Sundberg, E. Andr´ e, C. Busso, L. Y. Devillers, J. Epps, P. Laukka, S. S. Narayanan et al. , 'The geneva minimalistic acoustic parameter set (gemaps) for voice research and affective computing,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 190-202, 2016. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10

    Slow fusion treats the time domain like a spatial domain, progressively learning low-level to high-level temporal features, and effectively reduces the amount of parameters required due to temporal depth, allowing for more input frames.

    “For example, Gupta et al. [62] used a variant called slow fusion [153], which treats the time domain like a spatial domain, progressively learning low-level to highlevel temporal features. As the amount of parameters required due to the temporal depth of the input is effectively reduced, this allows for more input frames.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [62] [62] O. Gupta, D. Raviv, and R. Raskar, 'Multi-velocity neural networks for facial expression recognition in videos,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [153] [153] A. Karpathy, G. Toderici, S. Shetty, T. Leung, R. Sukthankar, and L. Fei-Fei, 'Large-scale video classification with convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. CVPR , 2014, pp. 1725-1732. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10

    When using 3D CNN for spatio-temporal modeling of image sequences, the line between spatial and temporal representation learning can be blurred.

    “When using 3D CNN for spatio-temporal modeling of image sequences as discussed in Section 3.1.1, the line between spatial and temporal representation learning can be blurred.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10

    End-to-end training of the entire CNN-LSTM system addresses the disconnected training problem and can lead to accuracy improvements.

    “End-to-end training of the entire CNN-LSTM system addresses this problem, and can lead to accuracy improvements [108].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Learning joint feature representations · p. 12

    It is generally accepted in the literature that multimodal sensor combinations have complementary effects and thus may increase model accuracy.

    “It is generally accepted in the literature that multimodal (e.g., audiovisual) sensor combinations have complementary effects and thus may increase model accuracy [11].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] [11] Z. Zeng, M. Pantic, G. I. Roisman, and T. S. Huang, 'A survey of affect recognition methods: Audio, visual, and spontaneous expressions,' IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 39-58, 2009. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3.2 Learning joint features with physiological data · p. 13

    Ringeval et al. concluded that in feature-level fusion, ECG data helps for prediction of valence, but not arousal.

    “They concluded that in featurelevel fusion, ECG data helps for prediction of valence, but not arousal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65] [65] F. Ringeval, F. Eyben, E. Kroupi, A. Yuce, J.-P. Thiran, T. Ebrahimi, D. Lalanne, and B. Schuller, 'Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data,' Pattern Recognit. Lett. , vol. 66, pp. 22-30, 2015. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13

    The ambiguity of human affect inherently makes both affect recognition and the labeling process difficult, and there is an accuracy limit in the degree of agreement between multiple labelers.

    “The ambiguity of human affect inherently makes both affect recognition and the labeling process difficult-there is an accuracy limit in the degree of agreement between multiple labelers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3.2 Learning joint features with physiological data · p. 13

    Ranganathan et al. demonstrated the feasibility of learning joint feature representations of AVP sensor data with approach J1 and a DBN, but did not compare performances of different modality combinations.

    “Ranganathan et al. [149] demonstrated the feasibility of learning joint feature representations of AVP sensor data with approach J1 and a DBN, but do not compare the performances of different modality combinations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [149] [149] H. Ranganathan, S. Chakraborty, and S. Panchanathan, 'Multimodal emotion recognition using deep learning architectures,' in Proc. Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vision , 2016, pp. 1-9. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 14

    The higher difficulty and inherent ambiguity of affective displays, unreliable ground truth, and imbalanced datasets contribute to the limited impact of deep learning in affect recognition.

    “This can in part be attributed to the higher difficulty and inherent ambiguity of affective displaysalthough many databases now provide annotations from multiple labelers, the ground truth tends to be unreliable and datasets are often imbalanced.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3.1 Learning joint features with audiovisual data · p. 13

    Tzirakis et al. used a two-layer LSTM network for feature fusion on raw audiovisual data with two CNNs, and it outperformed the state of the art.

    “Learning from raw audiovisual data with two CNNs, Tzirakis et al. [108] used a two-layer LSTM network for feature fusion, which was found to outperform the state of the art.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3.2 Learning joint features with physiological data · p. 13

    Both Yin et al. and Liu et al. found that the representation learned through feature-level fusion leads to improved accuracy over individual modalities.

    “Both studies found that the representation learned through feature-level fusion leads to improved accuracy over individual modalities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [171] [171] Z. Yin, M. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Yang, and J. Zhang, 'Recognition of emotions using multimodal physiological signals and an ensemble deep learning model,' Comput. Meth. Programs Biomed. , vol. 140, pp. 93-110, 2017.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [175] [175] W. Liu, W.-L. Zheng, and B.-L. Lu, 'Emotion recognition using multimodal deep learning,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. , 2016, pp. 521-529. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3.1 Learning joint features with audiovisual data · p. 12

    Zhang et al. used a DBN to fuse frame-level audiovisual features learned independently via CNNs, and the learned features are average-pooled for classification at the video level and lead to an improvement over state-of-the-art methods.

    “Zhang et al. [85] used a DBN to fuse frame-level audiovisual features learned independently via CNNs; the learned features are averagepooled for classification at the video level and lead to an improvement over state-of-the-art methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [85] [85] S. Zhang, S. Zhang, T. Huang, W. Gao, and Q. Tian, 'Learning affective features with a hybrid deep model for audio-visual emotion recognition,' IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. , 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 12

    Learning from intermediate representations based on differential entropy also outperforms shallow models.

    “Similar results are reported when learning from intermediate representations based on differential entropy [55].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [55] [55] X. Li, D. Song, P. Zhang, G. Yu, Y. Hou, and B. Hu, 'Emotion recognition from multi-channel eeg data through convolutional recurrent neural network,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Bioinf. and Biomed. , 2016, pp. 352-359. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 12

    Yanagimoto and Sugimoto used a CNN on raw 16-channel EEG data to differentiate between positive and negative affective states, and this approach outperformed shallow models based on common features.

    “Yanagimoto and Sugimoto [145] used a CNN on raw 16-channel EEG data to differentiate between positive and negative affective states, which is shown to outperform shallow models based on common features.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [145] [145] M. Yanagimoto and C. Sugimoto, 'Recognition of persisting emotional valence from eeg using convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Workshop Computat. Intell. Appl. , 2016, pp. 27-32. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 14

    The small size of labeled datasets hinders the ability of deep models to generalize well and makes it difficult to train large models.

    “It hinders the ability of deep models to generalize well, and makes it difficult to train large models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    Gupta et al. demonstrated the feasibility of semi-supervised learning for affective computing, achieving promising results using 2777 labeled face videos to learn from the AUTOENCODER dataset of 6.5M unlabeled face video clips.

    “Gupta et al. [62] demonstrated the feasibility of semi-supervised learning for affective computing, achieving promising results using 2777 labeled face videos to learn from the AUTOENCODER dataset of 6.5M unlabeled face video clips.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] [62] O. Gupta, D. Raviv, and R. Raskar, 'Multi-velocity neural networks for facial expression recognition in videos,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    Most of these approaches train individual components separately, which may lead to suboptimal performance considering the whole system.

    “However, most of these approaches train individual components separately (e.g., [106], [90]), which may lead to suboptimal performance considering the whole system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [106] [106] S. E. Kahou, V. Michalski, K. Konda, R. Memisevic, and C. Pal, 'Recurrent neural networks for emotion recognition in video,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2015, pp. 467-474. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [90] [90] P. Khorrami, T. Le Paine, K. Brady, C. Dagli, and T. Huang, 'How deep neural networks can improve emotion recognition on video data,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Image Process. , 2016, pp. 619-623. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    In practice, specific details of available modalities and requirements regarding predictions are relevant factors, and available labels on common databases widely dictate which representation is used.

    “In practice, specific details of available modalities (e.g., static images or video data) and requirements regarding predictions (e.g., continuous or video-level) are relevant factors, and available labels on common databases widely dictate which representation is used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    Mirsamadi et al. found that even a simple attention mechanism contributes to SER by learning to ignore silent frames, adding 1-2% to model accuracy.

    “Mirsamadi et al. [63] found that even a simple attention mechanism contributes to SER by, for example, learning to ignore silent frames-an improvement that is easily interpretable and adds 1-2% to model accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] [63] S. Mirsamadi, E. Barsoum, and C. Zhang, 'Automatic speech emotion recognition using recurrent neural networks with local attention,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 2227-2231. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    Future multimodal affect recognition systems are likely to be trained in an end-to-end fashion, which aligns training of the entire network closer with the true performance measure but requires a larger amount of training examples.

    “Future multimodal affect recognition systems are likely to be trained in an end-to-end fashion, which aligns training of the entire network closer with the true performance measure [195] but requires a larger amount of training examples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [195] [195] A. Graves and N. Jaitly, 'Towards end-to-end speech recognition with recurrent neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. , 2014, pp. 1764-1772.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    Handcrafted features are readily available, widely recognized, and well-designed for specific applications such as FER and SER.

    “This can be attributed to multiple factors: Handcrafted features are readily available, widely recognized, and well-designed for specific applications such as FER and SER.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    Given the nature of sensor data in typical HCI scenarios, dimensional representations and combinations of categorical and dimensional models of affect will become even more relevant as a more natural way of dealing with continuous data.

    “However, given the nature of sensor data in typical HCI scenarios, it can be expected that dimensional representations, and combinations of categorical and dimensional models of affect will become even more relevant as a more natural way of dealing with continuous data [53].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] [53] H. Gunes and B. Schuller, 'Categorical and dimensional affect analysis in continuous input: Current trends and future directions,' Image Vision Comput. , vol. 31, pp. 120-136, 2013. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    DNNs are often described as 'black boxes', as their inner workings are complex and difficult to interpret.

    “In general, DNNs are often described as 'black boxes', as their inner workings are complex and difficult to interpret.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    This development suggests that affect recognition too may benefit from much larger datasets.

    “This development suggests that affect recognition too may benefit from much larger datasets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    While unsupervised learning allows models to learn better initial parameters from unlabeled datasets, fine-tuning with labeled data is still required to guide the model towards its learning goal.

    “While unsupervised learning allows models to learn better initial parameters from unlabeled datasets, fine-tuning with labeled data is still required to 'guide' the model towards its learning goal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    The labeling process for video-based affective datasets, especially with continuous annotations, is expensive and cannot easily be automated.

    “The labeling process for video-based affective datasets, especially with continuous annotations, is expensive and cannot easily be automated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    Such results indicate that the study of DNNs in affective computing could contribute to interdisciplinary emotion research by giving a further perspective on affective displays and their representation in general.

    “Such results indicate that the study of DNNs in affective computing could contribute to interdisciplinary emotion research by giving a further perspective on affective displays and their representation in general.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    Unsupervised learning has proved successful in SER; Deng et al. improved the training process on labeled data by exploiting knowledge from unlabeled data using AEs.

    “Unsupervised learning has also proved successful in SER-for example, Deng et al. [140] were able to improve the training process on labeled data by exploiting knowledge from unlabeled data using AEs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [140] [140] J. Deng, X. Xu, Z. Zhang, S. Fr¨ uhholz, and B. Schuller, 'Universum autoencoder-based domain adaptation for speech emotion recognition,' IEEE Signal Process. Lett. , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 500-504, 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    There are few specialized architectures researchers can draw from, which is why many fall back to ones from object recognition.

    “There are few specialized architectures researchers can draw from, which is why many fall back to ones from object recognition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
104 of 104
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Automatic human affect recognition is a key step towards more natural human-computer interaction.

    “Automatic human affect recognition is a key step towards more natural human-computer interaction.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Labeled data and computation time are limited and costly.

    “Labeled data and computation time are limited and costly, incentivizing the adoption of such models in affect recognition.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Deep and handcrafted features are complementary in affect recognition.

    “This suggests that deep and handcrafted features are complementary. As of this writing, the findings of most studies doing related comparisons support this assumption [96], [97], [98], [99], though in many cases a comparison is difficult as reported accuracies for wellperforming fusion approaches include features from other modalities (see Section 3.3).”
    “However, in contrast to fields such as object- and speech recognition, both are often found to be complementary in affect recognition as of this writing.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The reviewed studies' reported comparisons between shallow and deep architectures are valid and comparable enough to aggregate.

    “Particularly, our results show that out of the 150 studies reporting comparisons between shallow and deep architectures, 95% reported that deep learning can lead to improvements over conventional approaches.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 233 studies included in the review are representative of the literature on deep learning for affect recognition.

    “Of the 233 studies in our review, only 11% involved private databases not available to the public.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The classification scheme used to indicate the use of deep learning in the reviewed studies is valid.

    “We employ the classification scheme introduced in Table 1 and used throughout this review to indicate the use of deep learning in these studies.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning can be performed by various types of neural networks such as CNNs, DNNs, and RNNs, to recognize objects, track movements, and analyze behavior in video data.

    “Deep learning can be performed by various types of neural networks such as CNNs [39][40][41][42], DNNs [43,44], and RNNs [45,46], to recognize objects, track movements, and analyze behavior in video data [47].”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [46]

    Section 3.2.2 (p. 10) describes using skeletal and shoulder tracking to extract features of body movement for affect recognition. The Discussion (p. 15) also describes deep-learning models analyzing facial expressions and video segments. The paper supports movement and affect analysis, but not the broader claim that these methods recognize objects or analyze behavior generally in video data. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 202 · Cited by 243

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning
  2. 10.1109/TAFFC.2017.2763942 · DOI
  3. zhang, 2017, Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization, Proc Int Conf Learn Represent, 1
  4. aytar, 2016, SoundNet: Learning sound representations from unlabeled video, Proc 30th Int Conf Neural Inf Process Syst, 1
  5. schuller, 2013, The INTERSPEECH 2013 computational paralinguistics challenge, Proc Annu Conf Int Speech Commun Assoc, 148

Authors
Rouast, P. V., Adam, M. T. P., & Chiong, R.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
524-543
ISSN
  • 1949-3045 (ISSN-L)
  • 2371-9850
OpenAlex
W2907891676
Cited by
243
References
202
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14
FWCI
33.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Australian Government (10.13039/100015539)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
deep neural network, multimodal sensor fusion, audiovisual information, physiological sensors, feature representation learning, spatial feature representation, human-computer interaction, affective computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review