Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments
Open accessAbstract
Automatic human affect recognition is a key step towards more natural human-computer interaction. Recent trends include recognition in the wild using a fusion of audiovisual and physiological sensors, a challenging setting for conventional machine learning algorithms. Since 2010, novel deep learning algorithms have been applied increasingly in this field. In this paper, we review the literature on human affect recognition between 2010 and 2017, with a special focus on approaches using deep neural networks. By classifying a total of 950 studies according to their usage of shallow or deep architectures, we are able to show a trend towards deep learning. Reviewing a subset of 233 studies that employ deep neural networks, we comprehensively quantify their applications in this field. We find that deep learning is used for learning of (i) spatial feature representations, (ii) temporal feature representations, and (iii) joint feature representations for multimodal sensor data. Exemplary state-of-the-art architectures illustrate the progress. Our findings show the role deep architectures will play in human affect recognition, and can serve as a reference point for researchers working on related applications.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review classifies 950 human affect recognition studies from 2010–2017 and identifies a clear trend toward deep learning, with 233 deep-learning studies reviewed in detail. Deep networks are used mainly for spatial, temporal, and joint multimodal feature representations, generally improving accuracy but still constrained by limited labeled data.
Key findings
- Of 950 studies, deep learning rose from 1–2 studies per year to 52% of studies in 2017, a 119% average year-on-year increase; overall affect recognition studies increased 25% year-on-year on average between 2010 and 2016.
- Among 233 deep-learning studies, 173 learned spatial features, 105 temporal features, and 21 joint multimodal features; FER was most common (158 studies), followed by SER (82) and EEG (18).
- Deep features outperformed handcrafted features in 93% of 103 spatial comparisons, 92% of 73 temporal comparisons, and 95% of 150 shallow-vs-deep comparisons; however, only 69% of 16 joint-feature comparisons found feature-level fusion superior to decision fusion.
- Since 2015, all winning entries at the reviewed affect recognition competitions used deep learning; AFEW accuracy rose from 41.0% in 2013 to 60.3% in 2017.
Methods
- Two-stage literature search of studies on human affect recognition since 2010 in the ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink, and Web of Science.
- Stage 1 yielded 950 studies, manually classified by use of shallow or deep models; Stage 2 focused on 233 deep-learning studies, classified by modality and by whether deep learning learned spatial, temporal, or joint feature representations.
- Scope was restricted to sensor data from cues directly given by the human body (facial expressions, movement, speech, physiology); generic images/videos, music, and text were excluded, as were facial action unit and facial feature point detection, and SER was restricted to paralinguistic content.
Limitations
- The paper states that recognition accuracies across studies cannot be fairly compared because of differing training/test sets and evaluation statistics; it also notes unreliable ground truth, imbalanced datasets, and limited labeled data as major obstacles.
- The paper states that no consensus exists between categorical and dimensional affect representations, and that most reviewed studies still rely on categorical models (82%).
- Evident from the text: the search contains only partial 2017 data and excludes 2017 from the trend analysis; classification of studies was manual; and the review’s scope exclusions limit generalization to affect communicated through non-body cues such as generic images, music, or text.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 161 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation§ 2.4 Towards learning deep models of affect · p. 5
Deep learning is used for learning temporal feature representations in human affect recognition.
“Learning temporal feature representations. To learn representations of the temporal dynamics found in audio [63], sequences of images [64], and physiological measurements [55], DNNs and especially RNNs are successfully applied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [63] [63] S. Mirsamadi, E. Barsoum, and C. Zhang, 'Automatic speech emotion recognition using recurrent neural networks with local attention,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 2227-2231. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] [64] D. H. Kim, W. Baddar, J. Jang, and Y. M. Ro, 'Multi-objective based spatio-temporal feature representation learning robust to expression intensity variations for facial expression recognition,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , 2017. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [55] [55] X. Li, D. Song, P. Zhang, G. Yu, Y. Hou, and B. Hu, 'Emotion recognition from multi-channel eeg data through convolutional recurrent neural network,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Bioinf. and Biomed. , 2016, pp. 352-359. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning§ 3.1 Learning spatial feature representations · p. 6
CNNs are the most popular approach for learning spatial features.
“Hence, CNNs are the most popular approach for learning spatial features (see Fig. 2, S2a-S2e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 6
93% of studies reporting direct comparisons find that deep spatial features outperform handcrafted spatial features for FER.
“As a result, 93% of studies reporting direct comparisons find that deep spatial features outperform handcrafted spatial features for FER.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5
Considering physiological signals, DNNs are most frequently applied in studies based on electroencephalography (EEG).
“Considering physiological signals, DNNs are most frequently applied in studies based on electroencephalography (EEG).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 9
94% of studies reporting comparisons with handcrafted approaches find that deep temporal features perform better for FER.
“With DNNs, temporal modeling capabilities in FER can further be improved: 94% of studies reporting comparisons with handcrafted approaches find that deep temporal features perform better for FER.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingcitation§ 2.4 Towards learning deep models of affect · p. 5
Deep learning is used for learning spatial feature representations in human affect recognition.
“Learning spatial feature representations. For images [61], short-term 6 image sequences [62] and audio segments [54], DNNs and especially CNNs are used to learn spatial feature representations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [61] [61] S. Rifai, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, P. Vincent, and M. Mirza, 'Disentangling factors of variation for facial expression recognition,' in Proc. Europ. Conf. Comput. Vision , 2012, pp. 808-822. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [62] [62] O. Gupta, D. Raviv, and R. Raskar, 'Multi-velocity neural networks for facial expression recognition in videos,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [54] [54] G. Trigeorgis, F. Ringeval, R. Brueckner, E. Marchi, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'Adieu features? end-to-end speech emotion recognition using a deep convolutional recurrent network,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2016, pp. 5200-5204. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 2.4 Towards learning deep models of affect · p. 5
Deep learning is used for learning joint feature representations for multimodal sensor data in human affect recognition.
“Learning joint feature representations for multimodal data. In multimodal approaches, DNNs are leveraged to learn joint feature representations from multiple unimodal feature representations to accomplish feature-level fusion [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] [65] F. Ringeval, F. Eyben, E. Kroupi, A. Yuce, J.-P. Thiran, T. Ebrahimi, D. Lalanne, and B. Schuller, 'Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data,' Pattern Recognit. Lett. , vol. 66, pp. 22-30, 2015. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 3.1.4 Takeaways for spatial feature learning · p. 9
CNNs are the most widely used architecture for spatial feature learning (91% of the studies in our review).
“CNNs are the most widely used architecture for spatial feature learning (91% of the studies in our review; see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11
91% of studies reporting comparisons with handcrafted approaches find that deep temporal features perform better for SER.
“In particular, 91% of studies reporting comparisons with handcrafted approaches find that deep temporal features perform better for SER.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.1 Learning spatial feature representations · p. 6
Deep architectures are frequently applied to exploit spatial characteristic in sensor recordings containing static and short-term cues of affective behavior.
“In practice, we find that deep architectures are frequently applied to exploit this characteristic in sensor recordings containing static and short-term cues of affective behavior-both visual imagery and short segments of audio and physiological data can be interpreted in this way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8
90% of studies reporting direct comparisons find that deep spatial features outperform handcrafted spatial features for SER.
“Overall, 90% of studies reporting direct comparisons find that deep spatial features outperform handcrafted spatial features for SER.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
The approach of learning spatial features directly from 2D images with CNNs dominates the search results.
“As becomes clear from Tables 1 and 2, this approach dominates our search results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
Several challenge-winning studies choose to use both handcrafted and deep features, e.g., by score-level or model-level fusion of separate handcrafted and deep models.
“However, several challenge-winning studies [95], [15], [17], choose to use both handcrafted and deep features, e.g., by scorelevel [95] or model-level [17] fusion of separate handcrafted and deep models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [95] [95] P. Hu, D. Cai, S. Wang, A. Yao, and Y. Chen, 'Learning supervised scoring ensemble for emotion recognition in the wild,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2017, pp. 553-560. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] [15] J. Li, S. Roy, J. Feng, and T. Sim, 'Happiness level prediction with sequential inputs via multiple regressions,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 487-493. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] [17] S. Chen, Q. Jin, J. Zhao, and S. Wang, 'Multimodal multi-task learning for dimensional and continuous emotion recognition,' in Proc. AVEC , 2017, pp. 19-26. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
CNN architectures specifically designed for FER with six or fewer convolutional and fully-connected layers make up 56% of the studies.
“These CNN architectures, which are specifically designed for FER, make up 56% of the studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
Simple adjustment of face rotation and facial feature point alignment is reported to improve model accuracy (e.g., from 54% to 62% in [94]).
“Simple adjustment of face rotation and facial feature point alignment is reported to improve model accuracy (e.g., from 54% to 62% in [94]; see also [15], [99]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [94] [94] A. T. Lopes, E. de Aguiar, A. F. De Souza, and T. OliveiraSantos, 'Facial expression recognition with convolutional neural networks: Coping with few data and the training sample order,' Pattern Recognit. , vol. 61, pp. 610-628, 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] [15] J. Li, S. Roy, J. Feng, and T. Sim, 'Happiness level prediction with sequential inputs via multiple regressions,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 487-493. -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [99] [99] H. Kaya, F. G¨ urpınar, and A. A. Salah, 'Video-based emotion recognition in the wild using deep transfer learning and score fusion,' Image Vision Comput. , vol. 65, pp. 66-75, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
In benchmarking experiments across various datasets, many studies found that features extracted with CNNs lead to higher recognition accuracies than handcrafted features.
“In benchmarking experiments across various datasets, many studies found that features extracted with CNNs lead to higher recognition accuracies than handcrafted features (e.g., [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [64], [92], [93], [94]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [87] [87] P. Khorrami, T. Paine, and T. Huang, 'Do deep neural networks learn facial action units when doing expression recognition?' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vision , 2015, pp. 19-27. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [88] [88] H. Jung, S. Lee, J. Yim, S. Park, and J. Kim, 'Joint fine-tuning in deep neural networks for facial expression recognition,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vision , 2015, pp. 2983-2991. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [89] [89] S. Chen, X. Li, Q. Jin, S. Zhang, and Y. Qin, 'Video emotion recognition in the wild based on fusion of multimodal features,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 494-500. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
Most of these studies rely on smaller model sizes instead of transfer learning to avoid overfitting the relatively small number of examples.
“Most of these studies rely on smaller model sizes instead of transfer learning to avoid overfitting the relatively small number of examples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
The majority of reviewed studies apply some form of pre-processing to image data.
“Instead of learning from unprocessed images, the majority of the reviewed studies apply some form of pre-processing to image data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 8
Studies running experiments on data augmentation report accuracy improvements (e.g., from 79% to 89% in [87]).
“Studies running experiments on this technique report accuracy improvements (e.g., from 79% to 89% in [87]; see also [74], [94]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [87] [87] P. Khorrami, T. Paine, and T. Huang, 'Do deep neural networks learn facial action units when doing expression recognition?' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vision , 2015, pp. 19-27. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [74] [74] G. Levi and T. Hassner, 'Emotion recognition in the wild via convolutional neural networks and mapped binary patterns,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2015, pp. 503-510. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [94] [94] A. T. Lopes, E. de Aguiar, A. F. De Souza, and T. OliveiraSantos, 'Facial expression recognition with convolutional neural networks: Coping with few data and the training sample order,' Pattern Recognit. , vol. 61, pp. 610-628, 2017. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
As of this writing, the findings of most studies doing related comparisons support the assumption that deep and handcrafted features are complementary.
“As of this writing, the findings of most studies doing related comparisons support this assumption [96], [97], [98], [99], though in many cases a comparison is difficult as reported accuracies for wellperforming fusion approaches include features from other modalities (see Section 3.3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [96] [96] M. M. Ghazi and H. K. Ekenel, 'Automatic emotion recognition in the wild using an ensemble of static and dynamic representations,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 514-521. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [97] [97] W. Ding, M. Xu, D. Huang, W. Lin, M. Dong, X. Yu, and H. Li, 'Audio and face video emotion recognition in the wild using deep neural networks and small datasets,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 506-513. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [98] [98] B. Sun, L. Li, G. Zhou, and J. He, 'Facial expression recognition in the wild based on multimodal texture features,' J. Electron. Imaging , vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1-8, 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 8
Researchers report improvements in accuracy by applying intensity normalization (e.g., from 54% to 57% in [94]).
“Researchers report improvements in accuracy by applying intensity normalization (e.g., from 54% to 57% in [94]; see also [98]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [94] [94] A. T. Lopes, E. de Aguiar, A. F. De Souza, and T. OliveiraSantos, 'Facial expression recognition with convolutional neural networks: Coping with few data and the training sample order,' Pattern Recognit. , vol. 61, pp. 610-628, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [98] [98] B. Sun, L. Li, G. Zhou, and J. He, 'Facial expression recognition in the wild based on multimodal texture features,' J. Electron. Imaging , vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1-8, 2016. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8
A limited number of early applications in SER were combinations of DNNs with handcrafted LLDs.
“A limited number of early applications in SER were combinations of DNNs with handcrafted LLDs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
Only one study reported that deep and handcrafted features are not complementary.
“Only one study reported that deep and handcrafted features are not complementary [100].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] [100] B. Xu, Y. Fu, Y.-G. Jiang, B. Li, and L. Sigal, 'Video emotion recognition with transferred deep feature encodings,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimedia Retrieval , 2016, pp. 15-22. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 8
Improvements in accuracy are reported when following the approach of acquiring large models pre-trained for object classification, freezing lower-level layers, and fine-tuning higher-level layers for affect recognition (e.g., from 39% to 42% in [89]).
“Improvements in accuracy are reported when following this approach (e.g., from 39% to 42% in [89]; see also [99], [92]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [89] [89] S. Chen, X. Li, Q. Jin, S. Zhang, and Y. Qin, 'Video emotion recognition in the wild based on fusion of multimodal features,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 494-500. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [99] [99] H. Kaya, F. G¨ urpınar, and A. A. Salah, 'Video-based emotion recognition in the wild using deep transfer learning and score fusion,' Image Vision Comput. , vol. 65, pp. 66-75, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [92] [92] H. Li, J. Sun, Z. Xu, and L. Chen, 'Multimodal 2d+3d facial expression recognition with deep fusion convolutional neural network,' IEEE Trans. Multimedia , vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2816-2831, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9
Multiple studies have shown that transfer learning can improve model accuracy by leveraging additional sources of related knowledge.
“Multiple studies have shown that transfer learning can improve model accuracy by leveraging additional sources of related knowledge (e.g., from other paralinguistic tasks [136], various standard databases [137], and different affect representations [135]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [136] [136] J. Gideon, S. Khorram, Z. Aldeneh, D. Dimitriadis, and E. Provost, 'Progressive neural networks for transfer learning in emotion recognition,' in Proc. INTERSPEECH , 2017, pp. 10981102. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [137] [137] J. Deng, Z. Zhang, E. Marchi, and B. Schuller, 'Sparse autoencoder-based feature transfer learning for speech emotion recognition,' in Proc. ACII , 2013, pp. 511-516. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [135] [135] Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, F. Weninger, and B. Schuller, 'Multi-task deep neural network with shared hidden layers: Breaking down the wall between emotion representations,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 4990-4994. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8
Many recent studies in SER leverage DNNs to avoid the step of handcrafted feature engineering.
“Many recent studies in SER leverage DNNs to avoid the step of handcrafted feature engineering (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2 Learning temporal feature representations · p. 9
The existing architectures across all studies and modalities can be classified into one of three approaches: T1 fully-connected DNNs for learning spatio-temporal features from aggregated frame-level spatial features, T2 RNNs for global temporal modeling based on frame-level spatial features, and T3 CNNs for local temporal modeling.
“We found that the existing architectures-spanning all studies and modalities-can be classified into one of three approaches illustrated in Fig. 5: (T1) fully-connected DNNs for learning spatio-temporal features from aggregated frame-level spatial features, (T2) RNNs for global temporal modeling based on frame-level spatial features, and (T3) CNNs for local temporal modeling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.1.3 Learning spatial features from physiology · p. 9
As part of our review, we identified only four studies using 2D CNNs to learn spatial features from EEG data.
“As part of our review, we identified only four studies using 2D CNNs to learn spatial features from EEG data (see S2e in Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9
All except one study in our review use CNNs for feature learning directly from raw 1D audio.
“CNNs can be applied to raw 1D audio (see Section 2.1.2); indeed, all except one study in our review use CNNs for this task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9
Since 2016, a number of studies have started applying feature learning directly from the raw waveform in SER.
“Since 2016 (see Table 2), a number of studies have started applying this idea in SER.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10
Global temporal modeling is found to lead to improved accuracies when compared with simpler methods such as pooling of spatial features.
“Global temporal modeling is found to lead to improved accuracies when compared with simpler methods such as pooling of spatial features (e.g., [152], [90], [108]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [152] [152] J. Yan, W. Zheng, Z. Cui, C. Tang, T. Zhang, Y. Zong, and N. Sun, 'Multi-clue fusion for emotion recognition in the wild,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 458-463. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [90] [90] P. Khorrami, T. Le Paine, K. Brady, C. Dagli, and T. Huang, 'How deep neural networks can improve emotion recognition on video data,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Image Process. , 2016, pp. 619-623. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10
CNN-LSTM is the more frequent choice among the reviewed studies compared to CNN-RNN.
“We see both CNN-RNN (e.g., [18], [90]) and CNN-LSTM (e.g., [108], [105], [64]) architectures, with CNN-LSTM being the more frequent choice among the reviewed studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [18] [18] K. Brady, Y. Gwon, P. Khorrami, E. Godoy, W. Campbell, C. Dagli, and T. S. Huang, 'Multi-modal audio, video and physiological sensor learning for continuous emotion prediction,' in Proc. AVEC , 2016, pp. 97-104. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [90] [90] P. Khorrami, T. Le Paine, K. Brady, C. Dagli, and T. Huang, 'How deep neural networks can improve emotion recognition on video data,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Image Process. , 2016, pp. 619-623. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11
In general, the addition of RNN for temporal modeling is associated with an increase in model accuracy.
“In general, the addition of RNN for temporal modeling is associated with an increase in model accuracy (e.g., [129], [97], [162]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [129] [129] M. W¨ ollmer, M. Kaiser, F. Eyben, B. Schuller, and G. Rigoll, 'Lstm-modeling of continuous emotions in an audiovisual affect recognition framework,' Image Vision Comput. , vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 153-163, 2013. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [97] [97] W. Ding, M. Xu, D. Huang, W. Lin, M. Dong, X. Yu, and H. Li, 'Audio and face video emotion recognition in the wild using deep neural networks and small datasets,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 506-513. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [162] [162] F. Lingenfelser, J. Wagner, J. Deng, R. Bruckner, B. Schuller, and E. Andre, 'Asynchronous and event-based fusion systems for affect recognition on naturalistic data in comparison to conventional approaches,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , 2016. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11
LSTM is found to outperform state-of-the-art techniques like SVR.
“Here, LSTMis found to outperform state-of-the-art techniques like SVR (e.g., [150], [151]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [150] [150] M. A. Nicolaou, H. Gunes, and M. Pantic, 'Continuous prediction of spontaneous affect from multiple cues and modalities in valence-arousal space,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 92-105, 2011. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [151] [151] J. Wei, E. Pei, D. Jiang, H. Sahli, L. Xie, and Z. Fu, 'Multimodal continuous affect recognition based on lstm and multiple kernel learning,' in Proc. Annu. Summit Conf. Asia-Pac. Signal Inf. Proc. Assoc. , 2014, pp. 1-4. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11
When CNNs are used for modeling speech, they typically combine spatial modeling in the short term with temporal modeling of longer segments or entire utterances.
“When CNNs are used for modeling speech, they typically combine spatial modeling in the short term with temporal modeling of longer segments or entire utterances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 11
Brady et al. [18] found that learning temporal context with LSTM and handcrafted features leads to improvements over shallow baseline models.
“Brady et al. [18] found that learning temporal context with LSTM and handcrafted features leads to improvements over shallow baseline models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] [18] K. Brady, Y. Gwon, P. Khorrami, E. Godoy, W. Campbell, C. Dagli, and T. S. Huang, 'Multi-modal audio, video and physiological sensor learning for continuous emotion prediction,' in Proc. AVEC , 2016, pp. 97-104. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 11
Zheng et al. [167] found that DBNs can improve recognition accuracy of models based on differential entropy features.
“Zheng et al. [167] found that DBNs can improve recognition accuracy of models based on differential entropy features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [167] [167] W.-L. Zheng, J.-Y. Zhu, Y. Peng, and B.-L. Lu, 'Eeg-based emotion classification using deep belief networks,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimedia Expo , 2014, pp. 1-6. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 11
Xu and Plataniotis [168] showed that DBNs can build on PSD features to outperform state-of-the-art methods on the DEAP dataset.
“Similarly, Xu and Plataniotis [168] showed that DBNs can build on PSD features to outperform state-of-the-art methods on the DEAP dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [168] [168] H. Xu and K. N. Plataniotis, 'Affective states classification using eeg and semi-supervised deep learning approaches,' in Proc. Int. Workshop Multimedia Signal Process. , 2016, pp. 1-6. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 11
RNNs have been used to learn temporal context from EEG features to improve recognition accuracies.
“RNNs have been used to learn temporal context from EEG features to improve recognition accuracies [146], [55].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [146] [146] T. Zhang, W. Zheng, Z. Cui, Y. Zong, and Y. Li, 'Spatial-temporal recurrent neural network for emotion recognition,' IEEE Trans. Cybern. , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [55] [55] X. Li, D. Song, P. Zhang, G. Yu, Y. Hou, and B. Hu, 'Emotion recognition from multi-channel eeg data through convolutional recurrent neural network,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Bioinf. and Biomed. , 2016, pp. 352-359. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given§ 3.2.2 Learning temporal features from body movement · p. 10
In comparison with facial expression and speech, body movement and gestures were found to be less expressive for prediction of both arousal and valence.
“In comparison with facial expression and speech, they were found to be less expressive for prediction of both arousal and valence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10
In some cases spatio-temporal features can be derived for entire (short) sequences with 3D CNN.
“While this approach is typically limited to very short sequences, with further pooling steps necessary to derive sequence-level labels (e.g., [84], [85]), in some cases spatio-temporal features can be derived for entire (short) sequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [84] [84] P. Barros, D. Jirak, C. Weber, and S. Wermter, 'Multimodal emotional state recognition using sequence-dependent deep hierarchical features,' Neural Networks , vol. 72, pp. 140-151, 2015. -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [85] [85] S. Zhang, S. Zhang, T. Huang, W. Gao, and Q. Tian, 'Learning affective features with a hybrid deep model for audio-visual emotion recognition,' IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. , 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11
Dimensionality reduction of handcrafted features with DNNs can lead to improvements in accuracy over various databases.
“Dimensionality reduction of handcrafted features with DNNs can lead to improvements in accuracy over various databases [161].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [161] [161] A. Stuhlsatz, C. Meyer, F. Eyben, T. Zielke, G. Meier, and B. Schuller, 'Deep neural networks for acoustic emotion recognition: Raising the benchmarks,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2011, pp. 56885691. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 14
DNNs are part of most state-of-the-art affect recognition systems.
“In this review, we have seen that DNNs are part of most state-of-the-art affect recognition systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 14
Since 2015, all winning entries at affect recognition competitions have made use of deep learning.
“It is evident that since 2015, all winning entries at these competitions have made use of deep learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13
Only one database provides unlabeled affective displays (AUTOENCODER).
“Further, only one database provides unlabeled affective displays (AUTOENCODER).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 14
Out of 150 studies reporting comparisons between shallow and deep architectures, 95% reported that deep learning can lead to improvements over conventional approaches.
“Particularly, our results show that out of the 150 studies reporting comparisons between shallow and deep architectures, 95% reported that deep learning can lead to improvements over conventional approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reviewed studies' reported comparisons between shallow and deep architectures are valid and comparable enough to aggregate.
- Findingnone given§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 12
A limited number of four studies have attempted to learn spatio-temporal features directly from raw physiological data for discrimination between affective states.
“A limited number of four studies have attempted to learn spatio-temporal features directly from raw physiological data for discrimination between affective states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 14
On the AFEW dataset, recognition accuracies have increased from 41% in 2013 to 60.3% in 2017.
“On the AFEW dataset, which is extended with additional data every year, recognition accuracies have increased from 41% in 2013 to 60.3% in 2017.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 14
Databases published in 2016 and 2017 aim to provide sufficient training data for deep learning models.
“Databases published in 2016 and 2017 aim to provide sufficient training data for deep learning models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 3.2.5 Takeaways for temporal feature learning · p. 12
Studies are starting to implement end-to-end training for models that learn spatial and temporal features.
“We are starting to see studies implementing end-toend training for such models [54], [108]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [54] [54] G. Trigeorgis, F. Ringeval, R. Brueckner, E. Marchi, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'Adieu features? end-to-end speech emotion recognition using a deep convolutional recurrent network,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2016, pp. 5200-5204. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13
A total of 77 different public databases were used across the reviewed literature.
“A total of 77 different public databases were used across the reviewed literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13
The trend apparent in databases goes towards capturing more naturalistic affective displays, from posed to spontaneous displays.
“Overall, the trend apparent here goes towards capturing more naturalistic affective displays, as we venture from posed to spontaneous displays.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3.3.1 Learning joint features with audiovisual data · p. 12
The most common sensor combination found in 18 studies involves facial expressions and speech.
“The most common sensor combination found in 18 studies involves facial expressions and speech.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3.3.2 Learning joint features with physiological data · p. 13
A small number of three studies combined the audiovisual and physiological (AVP) modalities.
“A small number of three studies combined the audiovisual and physiological (AVP) modalities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13
Of the 233 studies in the review, only 11% involved private databases not available to the public.
“Of the 233 studies in our review, only 11% involved private databases not available to the public.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.3.3 Takeaways for joint feature learning · p. 13
Joint feature learning is most commonly applied to audiovisual fusion.
“Joint feature learning is most commonly applied to audiovisual fusion (see Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15
The combination of CNN for feature learning and LSTM to learn the temporal context is most widely used (21 studies).
“As discussed throughout this review, the combination of CNN for feature learning and LSTM to learn the temporal context is most widely used (21 studies).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Some recent contributions have shown that affect recognition systems can combine multiple DNN-based components.
“Some recent contributions have shown that affect recognition systems can combine multiple DNN-based components.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15
In most state-of-the-art affect recognition models, handcrafted features still play an important role.
“In most state-of-the-art affect recognition models, handcrafted features still play an important role.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16
The question of categorical versus dimensional representations of affective states remains unsolved, as no deciding trend emerges from the literature.
“The question of categorical versus dimensional representations of affective states remains unsolved, as no deciding trend emerges from the literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15
As of now, DNNs are generally applied in an isolated way to manage individual components.
“We find that as of now, DNNs are generally applied in an isolated way to manage individual components-hence, a combination of multiple DNN-based components comes to mind.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Affect recognition models are comprised of multiple components, including spatial and temporal feature learning and an additional fusion mechanism in multimodal systems.
“As we have seen, affect recognition models are comprised of multiple components, including the steps of spatial and temporal feature learning as well as an additional fusion mechanism in the case of multimodal systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.3 Frontiers in affect recognition · p. 4
The temporal dimension is an integral element of affective display that has not yet been fully embraced by research on affect recognition, especially facial expression recognition.
“The temporal dimension is an integral element of affective display that has not yet been fully embraced by research on affect recognition, especially FER.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] [7] M. Pantic and L. J. Rothkrantz, 'Toward an affect-sensitive multimodal human-computer interaction,' Proc. IEEE , vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 1370-1390, 2003. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1
Psychophysiological measures contain information about affective states.
“Psychophysiological measures were also shown to contain information about affective states [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] [8] R. W. Picard, E. Vyzas, and J. Healey, 'Toward machine emotional intelligence: Analysis of affective physiological state,' IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1175-1191, 2001. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 2.4 Towards learning deep models of affect · p. 4
The variation in sensor data is dominated by factors mostly unrelated to the task, spatially, temporally, and distributed across modalities on different time scales.
“The variation in the sensor data is dominated by factors mostly unrelated to the task, (i) spatially (e.g., in image data and short-term audio segments), (ii) temporally (e.g., in image sequences and long-term audio), and (iii) distributed across modalities on different time scales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.4 Towards learning deep models of affect · p. 5
Motivated by the success of deep learning in other AI-relevant tasks based on images and speech, researchers have started to use deep models for representation learning in affect recognition.
“Motivated by the success of deep learning in other AI-relevant tasks based on images and speech [24], researchers have started to use deep models for representation learning in affect recognition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] [24] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, 'Deep learning,' Nature , vol. 521, pp. 436-444, 2015. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
More advanced face frontalization involving approximation of 3D shape is useful when dealing with 3D head pose variation.
“More advanced face frontalization involving the approximation of 3D shape is useful when dealing with 3D head pose variation [104], [105].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [104] [104] T. Hassner, S. Harel, E. Paz, and R. Enbar, 'Effective face frontalization in unconstrained images,' in Proc. CVPR , 2015, pp. 42954304. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [105] [105] P. Rodriguez, G. Cucurull, J. Gonz` alez, J. M. Gonfaus, K. Nasrollahi, T. B. Moeslund, and F. X. Roca, 'Deep pain: Exploiting long short-term memory networks for facial expression classification,' IEEE Trans. Cybern. , vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1-11, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8
Short-term spectral, prosodic, and energy features of speech carry affective information.
“Research has shown that short-term spectral, prosodic, and energy features of speech carry affective information [121].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] [121] F. Eyben, K. R. Scherer, B. W. Schuller, J. Sundberg, E. Andr´ e, C. Busso, L. Y. Devillers, J. Epps, P. Laukka, S. S. Narayanan et al. , 'The geneva minimalistic acoustic parameter set (gemaps) for voice research and affective computing,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 190-202, 2016. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
3D CNNs are limited to short-term sequences (up to 1 s) because the number of model parameters and required examples increase with temporal depth.
“Since the number of model parameters and therefore the number of required examples increase with temporal depth of input sequences, the chosen number of frames is typically quite low 10 , and 3D CNNs are limited to short-term sequences (up to 1 s).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7
3D CNN architectures are theoretically capable of learning spatio-temporal features such as motion of facial action units.
“Such 3D CNN architectures [83] are theoretically capable of learning spatio-temporal features such as motion of facial action units.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] [83] S. Ji, W. Xu, M. Yang, and K. Yu, '3d convolutional neural networks for human action recognition,' IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 221-231, 2013. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 8
Since the number of labeled examples for FER remains relatively limited, large models are likely to overfit the data.
“Since the number of labeled examples for FER remains relatively limited, large 11 models are likely to overfit the data [106], [107], [89], [108].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [106] [106] S. E. Kahou, V. Michalski, K. Konda, R. Memisevic, and C. Pal, 'Recurrent neural networks for emotion recognition in video,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2015, pp. 467-474. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [107] [107] H.-W. Ng, V. D. Nguyen, V. Vonikakis, and S. Winkler, 'Deep learning for emotion recognition on small datasets using transfer learning,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2015, pp. 443449. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [89] [89] S. Chen, X. Li, Q. Jin, S. Zhang, and Y. Qin, 'Video emotion recognition in the wild based on fusion of multimodal features,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 494-500. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9
Knowledge transfer from domains like music and visual object recognition is also possible.
“Knowledge transfer from domains like music [141] and visual object recognition [132], [85] is also possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [141] [141] E. Coutinho, J. Deng, and B. Schuller, 'Transfer learning emotion manifestation across music and speech,' in Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks , 2014, pp. 3592-3598. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [132] [132] C.-T. Ho, Y.-H. Lin, and J.-L. Wu, 'Emotion prediction from usergenerated videos by emotion wheel guided deep learning,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. , 2016, pp. 3-12. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [85] [85] S. Zhang, S. Zhang, T. Huang, W. Gao, and Q. Tian, 'Learning affective features with a hybrid deep model for audio-visual emotion recognition,' IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 9
Simple feature pooling strategies such as mean pooling, max pooling, or feature concatenation typically ignore most of the temporal variation in the sequence, which may contain valuable contextual information.
“However, such strategies typically ignore most of the temporal variation in the sequence, which may contain valuable contextual information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8
Learned features from raw spectral representations can be shown to have similarities to handcrafted LLDs.
“Such learned features can be shown to have similarities to handcrafted LLDs [54].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] [54] G. Trigeorgis, F. Ringeval, R. Brueckner, E. Marchi, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'Adieu features? end-to-end speech emotion recognition using a deep convolutional recurrent network,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2016, pp. 5200-5204. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11
Depending on the nature of the source audio, it can be beneficial to apply HSFs to frame-level LLDs according to a sliding window before applying the RNN.
“Depending on the nature of the source audio, it can be beneficial to apply HSFs to frame-level LLDs according to a sliding window before applying the RNN [151], [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [151] [151] J. Wei, E. Pei, D. Jiang, H. Sahli, L. Xie, and Z. Fu, 'Multimodal continuous affect recognition based on lstm and multiple kernel learning,' in Proc. Annu. Summit Conf. Asia-Pac. Signal Inf. Proc. Assoc. , 2014, pp. 1-4. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [65] [65] F. Ringeval, F. Eyben, E. Kroupi, A. Yuce, J.-P. Thiran, T. Ebrahimi, D. Lalanne, and B. Schuller, 'Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data,' Pattern Recognit. Lett. , vol. 66, pp. 22-30, 2015. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11
Overfitting is still a problem for this approach due to the large number of model parameters and limited dataset sizes.
“Overfitting is still a problem for this approach due to the large number of model parameters and limited dataset sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10
A disadvantage of most CNN-LSTM implementations is that training occurs in a disconnected way: the CNN is trained on frame-level for static spatial affect recognition, so extracted features are not necessarily optimal for further temporal context learning by the RNN.
“A disadvantage of most CNN-LSTM implementations is that training occurs in a disconnected way: The CNN is trained on frame-level, specifically for static spatial affect recognition. Hence, the extracted features are not necessarily optimal for further temporal context learning by the RNN.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11
The kernels of higher-level convolutional layers can often be interpreted as learning temporal structure based on spatial features learned by the kernels in the first layer.
“The kernels of higher-level (i.e., second or third) convolutional layers can often be interpreted as learning temporal structure based on spatial features learned by the kernels in the first layer (see Section 3.1.2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.3.2 Learning joint features with physiological data · p. 13
Yin et al. successfully used a fusion SAE to aggregate handcrafted features from several different sensors.
“Yin et al. [171] successfully used a fusion SAE to aggregate handcrafted features from several different sensors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [171] [171] Z. Yin, M. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Yang, and J. Zhang, 'Recognition of emotions using multimodal physiological signals and an ensemble deep learning model,' Comput. Meth. Programs Biomed. , vol. 140, pp. 93-110, 2017.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 12
CNNs trained unsupervised via AEs on raw blood volume pulse and skin conductance signals outperformed models based on handcrafted features.
“For this purpose, they used CNNs trained in an unsupervised way via AEs to learn features from raw blood volume pulse and skin conductance signals, which outperformed models based on handcrafted features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [172] [172] H. P. Martinez, Y. Bengio, and G. N. Yannakakis, 'Learning deep physiological models of affect,' IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. , vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 20-33, 2013. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.3.1 Learning joint features with audiovisual data · p. 13
Initial studies reported that dynamic feature fusion can lead to performance improvements compared to simpler fusion strategies.
“Initial studies reported that dynamic feature fusion can lead to performance improvements compared to simpler fusion strategies [162].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [162] [162] F. Lingenfelser, J. Wagner, J. Deng, R. Bruckner, B. Schuller, and E. Andre, 'Asynchronous and event-based fusion systems for affect recognition on naturalistic data in comparison to conventional approaches,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , 2016. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.3.1 Learning joint features with audiovisual data · p. 12
Kim et al. and others demonstrated that joint feature representations can be learned with DBNs.
“Kim et al. [159] and others (e.g., [149], [148]) demonstrated how this can be achieved with DBNs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [159] [159] Y. Kim, H. Lee, and E. M. Provost, 'Deep learning for robust feature generation in audiovisual emotion recognition,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2013, pp. 3687-3691. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [149] [149] H. Ranganathan, S. Chakraborty, and S. Panchanathan, 'Multimodal emotion recognition using deep learning architectures,' in Proc. Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vision , 2016, pp. 1-9. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [148] [148] B. Zhang, G. Essl, and E. Mower Provost, 'Automatic recognition of self-reported and perceived emotion: Does joint modeling help?' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 217-224. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 14
In comparison to related fields like object detection and ASR, the impact of deep learning on affect recognition has not yet been fully felt.
“However, in comparison to related fields like object detection and ASR, the impact of deep learning has not yet been fully felt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 14
A major obstacle is the relatively small size of labeled datasets.
“A major obstacle is the relatively small size of labeled datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.3.2 Learning joint features with physiological data · p. 13
Liu et al. used handcrafted features derived from EEG and eye tracking as input into a SAE.
“Similarly, Liu et al. [175] used handcrafted features derived from EEG and eye tracking as input into a SAE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [175] [175] W. Liu, W.-L. Zheng, and B.-L. Lu, 'Emotion recognition using multimodal deep learning,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. , 2016, pp. 521-529. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.3.1 Learning joint features with audiovisual data · p. 13
Several other studies based on handcrafted features found that decision-level fusion on top of individual LSTM models leads to better performance.
“However, several other studies based on handcrafted features found that decision-level fusion on top of individual LSTM models leads to better performance [65], [129].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [65] [65] F. Ringeval, F. Eyben, E. Kroupi, A. Yuce, J.-P. Thiran, T. Ebrahimi, D. Lalanne, and B. Schuller, 'Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data,' Pattern Recognit. Lett. , vol. 66, pp. 22-30, 2015. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [129] [129] M. W¨ ollmer, M. Kaiser, F. Eyben, B. Schuller, and G. Rigoll, 'Lstm-modeling of continuous emotions in an audiovisual affect recognition framework,' Image Vision Comput. , vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 153-163, 2013. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given§ 3.2.5 Takeaways for temporal feature learning · p. 12
RNNs are useful for global temporal modeling of affect.
“While CNNs are well suited for local temporal modeling, RNNs are found to be useful for global temporal modeling of affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 3.2.5 Takeaways for temporal feature learning · p. 12
CNNs are well suited for local temporal modeling of affect.
“While CNNs are well suited for local temporal modeling, RNNs are found to be useful for global temporal modeling of affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 12
Martinez et al. were the first to learn deep features directly from peripheral physiology.
“Martinez et al. [172] were the first to learn deep features directly from the peripheral physiology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [172] [172] H. P. Martinez, Y. Bengio, and G. N. Yannakakis, 'Learning deep physiological models of affect,' IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. , vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 20-33, 2013. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.3 Learning joint feature representations · p. 12
The literature generally reports that decision-level fusion works better for affect recognition given the datasets and models currently used.
“To date, the literature generally reports that decision-level fusion works better for affect recognition given the datasets and models currently used [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] [65] F. Ringeval, F. Eyben, E. Kroupi, A. Yuce, J.-P. Thiran, T. Ebrahimi, D. Lalanne, and B. Schuller, 'Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data,' Pattern Recognit. Lett. , vol. 66, pp. 22-30, 2015. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.2.5 Takeaways for temporal feature learning · p. 12
In end-to-end training for spatial and temporal feature learning, the problem of limited labeled data becomes especially noticeable.
“however in this setting the problem of limited labeled data becomes especially noticeable [63], [139].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [63] [63] S. Mirsamadi, E. Barsoum, and C. Zhang, 'Automatic speech emotion recognition using recurrent neural networks with local attention,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 2227-2231. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [139] [139] S. Pini, O. B. Ahmed, M. Cornia, L. Baraldi, R. Cucchiara, and B. Huet, 'Modeling multimodal cues in a deep learning-based framework for emotion recognition in the wild,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. ACM, 2017, pp. 536-543. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Research suggests that the size of a dataset can be a bottleneck for performance of deep learning models.
“Research suggests that the size of a dataset can be a bottleneck for performance of deep learning models [34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] [34] C. Sun, A. Shrivastava, S. Singh, and A. Gupta, 'Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vision , 2017, pp. 843-852. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Attention mechanisms allow models to learn to pay more attention to promising segments of affective display.
“They allow models to learn to pay more attention to promising segments of, say, a video of affective display.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [196] [196] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, 'Attention is all you need,' in Proc. NIPS , 2017.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16
Multiple studies have found that higher layers of CNNs learn concepts similar to Action Units in facial expression recognition.
“Multiple studies have followed this approach to understand how CNNs recognize facial expressions, finding that higher layers learn concepts similar to Action Units (e.g., [87], [91]), validating previous research done in FER-Fig. 7 features some examples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [87] [87] P. Khorrami, T. Paine, and T. Huang, 'Do deep neural networks learn facial action units when doing expression recognition?' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vision , 2015, pp. 19-27. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [91] [91] R. Breuer and R. Kimmel, 'A deep learning perspective on the origin of facial expressions,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.01842 , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15
The number of examples to draw from is not large enough to learn truly expressive deep features.
“Furthermore, the number of examples to draw from is not large enough to learn truly expressive deep features.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 14
As of this writing, employed techniques such as knowledge transfer from related disciplines and data augmentation ultimately cannot fully make up for the lack of data.
“However, as of this writing, employed techniques such as knowledge transfer from related disciplines and data augmentation ultimately cannot fully make up for the lack of data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16
For SER, Tzirakis et al. found that LSTM cells learn representations similar to well-known prosodic features.
“Similarly, for SER, Tzirakis et al. [108] found that LSTM cells learn representations similar to well-known prosodic features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15
In 2018, supervised pre-training was successfully used at Facebook to transfer knowledge of 3.5B public Instagram images and hashtags for generic image classification and object detection.
“In 2018, supervised pre-training was successfully used at Facebook [193] to transfer knowledge of 3.5B public Instagram images and hashtags for generic image classification and object detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [193] [193] D. Mahajan, R. Girshick, V. Ramanathan, K. He, M. Paluri, Y. Li, A. Bharambe, and L. van der Maaten, 'Exploring the limits of weakly supervised pretraining,' in Proc. Europ. Conf. Comput. Vision , 2018, pp. 185-201. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Deep models have not yet been established as methods of affect recognition.
“On the other hand, deep models have not yet been established as methods of affect recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 47
- May combine two claims. 66
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5Individual studies often use multiple modalities or apply deep learning in more than one way.
“Note that individual studies often use multiple modalities or apply deep learning in more than one way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 6The review discusses the application of deep learning across 141 studies to learn spatial features from images.
“In this section, we discuss the application of deep learning across 141 studies to learn spatial features from images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.1.4 Takeaways for spatial feature learning · p. 9Deep spatial features lead to higher accuracies than handcrafted spatial features; out of 103 studies that reported comparisons, 93% support this finding.
“Deep spatial features lead to higher accuracies than handcrafted spatial features. Out of 103 studies that reported comparisons, 93% support this finding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5Deep learning has gained considerable attention in human affect recognition since 2010, being employed in 52% of studies in 2017, with a 119% average year-on-year increase in the number of published studies.
“Deep learning has gained considerable attention in this field since 2010: Up from one to two studies per year, it is being employed in 52% of studies in 2017a 119% average year-on-year increase in the number of published studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5Stage 1 of the literature search yielded a total of 950 studies on human affect recognition.
“Stage 1 of our search yielded a total of 950 studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 6For speech emotion recognition, learning temporal feature representations with DNNs is an active research area.
“For SER in particular, learning of temporal feature representations with DNNs is an active research area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5The application of DNNs for facial expression recognition has attracted the most attention in the literature, featured in almost twice as many studies compared to speech emotion recognition, which is featured second most frequently.
“From Table 1, it is apparent that the application of DNNs for FER has attracted the most attention in the literature, featured in almost twice as many studies compared to SER, which is featured second most frequently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5Between 2010 and 2016, the number of studies on human affect recognition increased overall, with an average year-on-year increase of 25%.
“Between 2010 and 2016 9 , there was an overall increase in the number of studies on human affect recognition (25% year-on-year increase on average).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5Stage 2 of the review focused exclusively on 233 studies that use deep learning for affect recognition.
“In Stage 2, we focus exclusively on the 233 studies found in our review that use deep learning for affect recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 6Learning joint feature representations for early feature fusion across different modalities is a less active but developing application area of DNNs in human affect recognition.
“A less active, but developing application area of DNNs in human affect recognition is learning joint feature representations for the purpose of early feature fusion across different modalities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 857% of reviewed studies report using dropout for fully-connected layers, and 12% report using it for convolutional layers.
“It is widely used in the reviewed studies-57% report using dropout for fullyconnected layers, and 12% report using it for convolutional layers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7Face cropping is standard practice and reported to increase model accuracy (e.g., from 54% to 72% in [94]).
“Face cropping is standard practice, and reported to increase model accuracy (e.g., from 54% to 72% in [94]; see also [15]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [94] [94] A. T. Lopes, E. de Aguiar, A. F. De Souza, and T. OliveiraSantos, 'Facial expression recognition with convolutional neural networks: Coping with few data and the training sample order,' Pattern Recognit. , vol. 61, pp. 610-628, 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] [15] J. Li, S. Roy, J. Feng, and T. Sim, 'Happiness level prediction with sequential inputs via multiple regressions,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 487-493. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7Most of these studies use additional datasets and transfer learning to avoid overfitting.
“Most of these studies use additional datasets and transfer learning to avoid overfitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8Most recent models use pre-defined sets of LLDs for spatial modeling.
“Most recent models use pre-defined sets of LLDs for spatial modeling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7Most frequently chosen existing architectures are VGG Net (23 studies) and AlexNet (18 studies).
“Most frequently chosen are VGG Net [80] (23 studies) and AlexNet [36] (18 studies).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [80] [80] K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, 'Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. , 2014. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] [36] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, 'Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. NIPS , vol. 25, 2012, pp. 1097-1105. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8Li et al. [125] used a six-layer DNN to learn frame-level features from concatenated MFCCs of a sliding context window, yielding an accuracy improvement of more than 10% over GMMs.
“For example, Li et al. [125] used a six-layer DNN to learn frame-level features from concatenated MFCCs of a sliding context window. In their experiments, this yielded an accuracy improvement of more than 10% over GMMs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [125] [125] L. Li, Y. Zhao, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, F. Wang, I. Gonzalez, E. Valentin, and H. Sahli, 'Hybrid deep neural network-hidden markov model (dnn-hmm) based speech emotion recognition,' in Proc. ACII , 2013, pp. 312-317. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 8Khorrami et al. [87] reported an increase in accuracy of 2.5% after applying dropout to fully-connected layers.
“Khorrami et al. [87] reported an increase in accuracy of 2.5% after applying dropout to fully-connected layers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] [87] P. Khorrami, T. Paine, and T. Huang, 'Do deep neural networks learn facial action units when doing expression recognition?' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vision , 2015, pp. 19-27. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 8Data augmentation artificially increases the number of available examples or training epochs by a factor typically between 10 and 30, and up to 300.
“This way, researchers artificially increase the number of available examples or training epochs by a factor typically between 10 and 30 [88], [113], [114], and up to 300 [115].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [88] [88] H. Jung, S. Lee, J. Yim, S. Park, and J. Kim, 'Joint fine-tuning in deep neural networks for facial expression recognition,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vision , 2015, pp. 2983-2991. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [113] [113] Y. Guo, D. Tao, J. Yu, H. Xiong, Y. Li, and D. Tao, 'Deep neural networks with relativity learning for facial expression recognition,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimedia Expo Workshops , 2016, pp. 1-6. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [114] [114] Y. Cai, W. Zheng, T. Zhang, Q. Li, Z. Cui, and J. Ye, 'Video based emotion recognition using cnn and brnn,' in Proc. Chin. Conf. Pattern Recognition , 2016, pp. 679-691. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8Some studies considered using known architectures from object recognition and regarded it as necessary to pre-train these larger models on ImageNet to avoid overfitting the relatively few labeled examples.
“Some considered using known architectures from object recognition [132], [85], [127]. Here, the authors regarded it as necessary to pre-train these larger models on the ImageNet database to avoid overfitting the relatively few labeled examples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [132] [132] C.-T. Ho, Y.-H. Lin, and J.-L. Wu, 'Emotion prediction from usergenerated videos by emotion wheel guided deep learning,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. , 2016, pp. 3-12. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [85] [85] S. Zhang, S. Zhang, T. Huang, W. Gao, and Q. Tian, 'Learning affective features with a hybrid deep model for audio-visual emotion recognition,' IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [127] [127] A. M. Badshah, J. Ahmad, N. Rahim, and S. W. Baik, 'Speech emotion recognition from spectrograms with deep convolutional neural network,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Platform Technol. Serv. , 2017, pp. 1-5. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9Dropout is applied in fully-connected layers in 43% of studies and in convolutional layers in 14% of studies.
“Dropout is applied in fullyconnected (reported in 43% of studies, e.g., [135]) and convolutional layers (14% of studies, e.g., [108]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [135] [135] Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, F. Weninger, and B. Schuller, 'Multi-task deep neural network with shared hidden layers: Breaking down the wall between emotion representations,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 4990-4994. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.1.3 Learning spatial features from physiology · p. 9All four identified studies achieved accuracy improvements over handcrafted approaches, but a lack of training data was also mentioned.
“All achieved accuracy improvements over handcrafted approaches, but a lack of training data was also mentioned [145], [146].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [145] [145] M. Yanagimoto and C. Sugimoto, 'Recognition of persisting emotional valence from eeg using convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Workshop Computat. Intell. Appl. , 2016, pp. 27-32. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [146] [146] T. Zhang, W. Zheng, Z. Cui, Y. Zong, and Y. Li, 'Spatial-temporal recurrent neural network for emotion recognition,' IEEE Trans. Cybern. , 2017. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10Zhang et al. [148] and Ranganathan et al. [149] used fully-connected DBN models to learn from aggregated facial feature point trajectories, both improving recognition accuracies over shallow aggregation strategies.
“For example, Zhang et al. [148] and Ranganathan et al. [149] used fully-connected DBN models to learn from aggregated facial feature point trajectories, both improving recognition accuracies over shallow aggregation strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [148] [148] B. Zhang, G. Essl, and E. Mower Provost, 'Automatic recognition of self-reported and perceived emotion: Does joint modeling help?' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 217-224. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [149] [149] H. Ranganathan, S. Chakraborty, and S. Panchanathan, 'Multimodal emotion recognition using deep learning architectures,' in Proc. Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vision , 2016, pp. 1-9. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8Most studies chose custom architectures of one to three convolutional layers and one to three fully-connected layers for this task.
“Most studies chose custom architectures of one to three convolutional layers and one to three fully-connected layers for this task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.1.3 Learning spatial features from physiology · p. 9Yanagimoto and Sugimoto [145] divided raw 16-channel EEG data into 1s segments and used a seven-layer CNN with 10 ms kernels on the first layer, leading to accuracy improvements of over 20%.
“For example, Yanagimoto and Sugimoto [145] divided the raw 16-channel EEG data into 1s segments and used a seven-layer CNN with 10 ms kernels on the first layer, leading to accuracy improvements of over 20%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [145] [145] M. Yanagimoto and C. Sugimoto, 'Recognition of persisting emotional valence from eeg using convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Workshop Computat. Intell. Appl. , 2016, pp. 27-32. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9SoundNet, a 1D CNN trained with unlabeled video, has been shown to perform well in SER even without fine-tuning, and was featured in a challenge-winning submission.
“SoundNet [138], a 1D CNN trained with unlabeled video, has been shown to perform well in SER even without fine-tuning [139], and was featured in a challenge-winning submission [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [138] [138] Y. Aytar, C. Vondrick, and A. Torralba, 'Soundnet: Learning sound representations from unlabeled video,' in Proc. NIPS , 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [139] [139] S. Pini, O. B. Ahmed, M. Cornia, L. Baraldi, R. Cucchiara, and B. Huet, 'Modeling multimodal cues in a deep learning-based framework for emotion recognition in the wild,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. ACM, 2017, pp. 536-543. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] [17] S. Chen, Q. Jin, J. Zhao, and S. Wang, 'Multimodal multi-task learning for dimensional and continuous emotion recognition,' in Proc. AVEC , 2017, pp. 19-26. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9Bertero et al. [134] proposed one convolutional layer with 25 ms kernels, which achieved a 3% accuracy improvement over LLDs.
“Bertero et al. [134] proposed one convolutional layer with 25 ms kernels, which achieved a 3% accuracy improvement over LLDs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [134] [134] D. Bertero and P. Fung, 'A first look into a convolutional neural network for speech emotion detection,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 5115-5119. -
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9Trigeorgis et al. [54] were the first to use CNNs for raw waveform in SER; they used two convolutional layers for spatial modeling, almost doubling ground truth correlation over LLDs for arousal, and slightly improving for valence.
“Trigeorgis et al. [54] were the first to do so: They used two convolutional layers for spatial modeling, almost doubling ground truth correlation over LLDs for arousal, and slightly improving for valence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] [54] G. Trigeorgis, F. Ringeval, R. Brueckner, E. Marchi, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'Adieu features? end-to-end speech emotion recognition using a deep convolutional recurrent network,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2016, pp. 5200-5204. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8Without any feature engineering, Mirsamadi et al. were able to learn features similar to LLDs from the raw spectral representation of individual audio frames at 25 ms, leading to an accuracy increase of 4%.
“Without any feature engineering, they were able to learn features similar to LLDs from the raw spectral representation of individual audio frames at 25 ms, leading to an accuracy increase of 4%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9Data augmentation to artificially increase the dataset size is used less often than for FER; notable examples include addition of Gaussian noise, different sampling frequencies, and modified playback speed.
“Data augmentation to artificially increase the dataset size is used less often than for FER; notable examples include the addition of Gaussian noise [129], different sampling frequencies [130], and modified playback speed [142].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [129] [129] M. W¨ ollmer, M. Kaiser, F. Eyben, B. Schuller, and G. Rigoll, 'Lstm-modeling of continuous emotions in an audiovisual affect recognition framework,' Image Vision Comput. , vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 153-163, 2013. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [130] [130] H. M. Fayek, M. Lech, and L. Cavedon, 'Towards real-time speech emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Signal Process. Commun. Syst. , 2015, pp. 1-5. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [142] [142] Z. Aldeneh and E. M. Provost, 'Using regional saliency for speech emotion recognition,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11The number of features per utterance varies from several hundred to several thousand, depending on the employed LLDs and HSFs.
“This number varies from several hundred [157] to several thousand [158], [123], depending on the employed LLDs and HSFs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [157] [157] B. Schuller, S. Steidl, and A. Batliner, 'The interspeech 2009 emotion challenge,' in Proc. INTERSPEECH , 2009. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [158] [158] B. W. Schuller, S. Steidl, A. Batliner, E. N¨ oth, A. Vinciarelli, F. Burkhardt, R. Van Son, F. Weninger, F. Eyben, T. Bocklet et al. , 'The interspeech 2012 speaker trait challenge,' in Proc. INTERSPEECH , 2012, pp. 254-257. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [123] [123] B. Schuller, S. Steidl, A. Batliner, A. Vinciarelli, K. Scherer, F. Ringeval, M. Chetouani, F. Weninger, F. Eyben, E. Marchi et al. , 'The interspeech 2013 computational paralinguistics challenge,' in Proc. INTERSPEECH , 2013. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 11Ringeval et al. [65] found that while the given physiological signal has lower predictive power than audiovisual signals, both are complementary.
“They found that while the given physiological signal has lower predictive power than audiovisual signals, both are complementary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] [65] F. Ringeval, F. Eyben, E. Kroupi, A. Yuce, J.-P. Thiran, T. Ebrahimi, D. Lalanne, and B. Schuller, 'Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data,' Pattern Recognit. Lett. , vol. 66, pp. 22-30, 2015. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 11As highlighted in Table 3, approach T1 is the primary application of DNNs for feature learning from physiological data.
“As highlighted in Table 3, approach T1 is the primary application of DNNs for feature learning from physiological data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11One study suggested that a smaller window size (2s) could be the best choice.
“One study suggested that a smaller window size (2s) could be the best choice [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] [65] F. Ringeval, F. Eyben, E. Kroupi, A. Yuce, J.-P. Thiran, T. Ebrahimi, D. Lalanne, and B. Schuller, 'Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data,' Pattern Recognit. Lett. , vol. 66, pp. 22-30, 2015. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11Since 2016, eight studies have explored combining deep spatial features and RNN-based temporal feature learning.
“Since 2016, eight studies have explored combining deep spatial features and RNN-based temporal feature learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 11Yin et al. [171] used stacked autoencoders to learn high-level representations from various peripheral sensors including skin temperature and blood volume pressure, improving the state-of-the-art by 5%.
“Yin et al. [171] used stacked autoencoders (SAEs) to learn high-level representations from various peripheral sensors including skin temperature and blood volume pressure, improving the state-of-the-art by 5%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [171] [171] Z. Yin, M. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Yang, and J. Zhang, 'Recognition of emotions using multimodal physiological signals and an ensemble deep learning model,' Comput. Meth. Programs Biomed. , vol. 140, pp. 93-110, 2017. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11Mirsamadi et al. [63] found that model performance is slightly lower with joint learning of both short-term spatial features and temporal context on the IEMOCAP dataset, while both improve model performance when applied independently.
“Mirsamadi et al. [63] found that model performance is slightly lower with joint learning of both short-term spatial features and temporal context on the IEMOCAP dataset [165], while both improve model performance when applied independently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [63] [63] S. Mirsamadi, E. Barsoum, and C. Zhang, 'Automatic speech emotion recognition using recurrent neural networks with local attention,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 2227-2231. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [165] [165] C. Busso, M. Bulut, C.-C. Lee, A. Kazemzadeh, E. Mower, S. Kim, J. N. Chang, S. Lee, and S. S. Narayanan, 'Iemocap: Interactive emotional dyadic motion capture database,' Language Resources Eval. , vol. 42, no. 4, p. 335, 2008. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11Studies aiming to reduce feature space dimensionality with deep learning almost exclusively use fully-connected DNNs, consisting of two to four hidden layers.
“Studies aiming to reduce feature space dimensionality with deep learning almost exclusively use fully-connected DNNs, consisting of two to four hidden layers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11Applications of similar architectures based on the raw waveform have also been attempted, showing that end-to-end learning can outperform shallow models.
“Applications of similar architectures based on the raw waveform have also been attempted [54], [108], showing that end-to-end learning can outperform shallow models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [54] [54] G. Trigeorgis, F. Ringeval, R. Brueckner, E. Marchi, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'Adieu features? end-to-end speech emotion recognition using a deep convolutional recurrent network,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2016, pp. 5200-5204. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 14DNNs are applied for learning of spatial feature representations, temporal feature representations, and joint feature representations for multimodal data.
“They are applied for learning of (i) spatial feature representations, (ii) temporal feature representations, and (iii) joint feature representations for multimodal data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 14Both AffectNet and EmotioNet are large web-based databases, each at around 1M labeled images.
“Both AffectNet and EmotioNet are large web-based databases, each at around 1M labeled images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3.2.5 Takeaways for temporal feature learning · p. 12Deep temporal features lead to higher accuracies than handcrafted temporal features, with 92% of 73 studies that reported comparisons supporting this finding.
“Deep temporal features lead to higher accuracies than handcrafted temporal features. Out of 73 studies that reported comparisons, 92% support this finding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13Overall, 190 studies use categorical models (82%), 37 studies use dimensional models (16%), and 6 use both (2.6%).
“Overall, 190 studies use categorical models (82%), 37 studies use dimensional models (16%), and only 6 use both (2.6%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13Of the 77 public databases used in the reviewed studies, 58 use categorical models (75%), 14 use dimensional models (18%), and 4 use both (5.2%).
“Of the 77 public databases used in the studies covered in our review, 58 use categorical models (75%), 14 use dimensional models (18%), and only 4 use both (5.2%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.3.3 Takeaways for joint feature learning · p. 13To date, there is no consensus whether feature-level fusion with deep learning leads to superior accuracy over simple decision fusion, with only 69% of 16 studies that reported comparisons finding that it does.
“To date, there is no consensus whether feature-level fusion with deep learning leads to superior accuracy over simple decision fusion. Out of 16 studies that reported comparisons, only 69% find that it does.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 14AffectNet includes both dimensional and categorical labels.
“Notably, AffectNet includes both dimensional and categorical labels, encouraging studies to bridge the gap between affect representations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 14The AUTOENCODER dataset is the largest face video dataset with 6.5M examples; it contains only 2777 labeled examples and is thus largely unlabeled.
“The AUTOENCODER dataset is the largest face video dataset with 6.5M examples; the dataset contains only 2777 labeled examples and is thus largely unlabeled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 3.2.5 Takeaways for temporal feature learning · p. 12Since 2015, there are studies using deep learning for both spatial and temporal feature learning.
“Since 2015, there are studies using deep learning for both spatial and temporal feature learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13At this stage, the number of examples per dataset does not show a clear upward trend, and only few deep learning studies covered in the review investigate both categorical and dimensional models.
“Unfortunately, at this stage, the number of examples per dataset does not see a clear upward trend yet and only few deep learning studies covered in our review investigate both types of models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 14Compared to older databases, databases published in 2016 and 2017 contain many more examples, made possible by (semi-)automating the labeling process or providing unlabeled examples.
“Compared to older databases, they contain many more examples, which is made possible by (semi-)automating the labeling process, or providing unlabeled examples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13The visual modality is featured most frequently in the databases.
“As expected from previous findings, the visual modality is featured most frequently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13Unlabeled databases are used exclusively for transfer learning.
“Unlabeled databases are used exclusively for transfer learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 3.3 Learning joint feature representations · p. 12The review reports on the approaches of 21 studies that use deep learning for joint feature learning from multimodal data.
“Here, we report on the approaches of 21 studies that use deep learning for joint feature learning from multimodal data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingreasoning§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13More recent databases such as FER2013 and SFEW2 tend to contain more examples than older databases such as JAFFE and CK+.
“Here, more recent databases such as FER2013 and SFEW2 tend to contain more examples than older databases such as JAFFE and CK+-this is made possible by resorting to sources like the web and semi-automatic labeling procedures as opposed to manual annotation of data collected in a laboratory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3.3.3 Takeaways for joint feature learning · p. 13Dimensional models of affect are used in 10% of spatial feature learning studies, 30% of temporal feature learning studies, and 52% of studies on joint feature learning.
“While dimensional models of affect are only used in 10% of spatial and 30% of temporal feature learning studies, they are employed in 52% of studies on joint feature learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16Dimensional models are already employed in 52% of joint feature learning studies and 30% of temporal feature learning studies.
“This already becomes apparent in joint feature learning and to some extent in temporal feature learning, where dimensional models are already employed in 52% and 30% of the reviewed studies, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16The majority of studies still rely on categorical models of affect (82%), particularly in spatial feature learning (92%).
“As can be seen in our review, the majority of studies still rely on categorical models of affect (82%), particularly in spatial feature learning (92%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15While handcrafted features are typically outperformed by DNN-learned features in direct comparison, some challenge-winning models rely on hybrid architectures that take advantage of complementarities between the two.
“While they are typically outperformed by DNN-learned features in direct comparison, some challenge-winning models rely on hybrid architectures that can take advantage of complementarities between the two [152], [18].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [152] [152] J. Yan, W. Zheng, Z. Cui, C. Tang, T. Zhang, Y. Zong, and N. Sun, 'Multi-clue fusion for emotion recognition in the wild,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 458-463. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] [18] K. Brady, Y. Gwon, P. Khorrami, E. Godoy, W. Campbell, C. Dagli, and T. S. Huang, 'Multi-modal audio, video and physiological sensor learning for continuous emotion prediction,' in Proc. AVEC , 2016, pp. 97-104. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 6Mehrabian posited that 55% of the emotion conveyed in a message is perceived visually.
“Mehrabian [71] famously posited that 55% of the emotion conveyed in a message is perceived visually.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] [71] A. Mehrabian, 'Communication without words,' Psychology Today , vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 53-56, 1968. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1Multimodal sensor combination improves recognition accuracy and robustness.
“multimodal sensor combination was found to improve recognition accuracy and robustness [10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] [10] A. Jaimes and N. Sebe, 'Multimodal human-computer interaction: A survey,' Comput. Vision and Image Understanding , vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 116-134, 2007. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1Since 2010, deep learning methods have been applied to affect recognition problems across multiple modalities and have led to improvements in accuracy, including winning performances at EmotiW and AVEC.
“Since 2010, deep learning methods have been applied to affect recognition problems across multiple modalities and led to improvements in accuracy, including winning performances at EmotiW [14], [15], [16] and AVEC [17], [18], [19].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [14] [14] Y. Fan, X. Lu, D. Li, and Y. Liu, 'Video-based emotion recognition using cnn-rnn and c3d hybrid networks,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 445-450. -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] [15] J. Li, S. Roy, J. Feng, and T. Sim, 'Happiness level prediction with sequential inputs via multiple regressions,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 487-493. -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] [16] B.-K. Kim, H. Lee, J. Roh, and S.-Y. Lee, 'Hierarchical committee of deep cnns with exponentially-weighted decision fusion for static facial expression recognition,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2015, pp. 427-434. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7CNNs are well suited to learn spatial features directly from image pixels.
“CNNs are well suited to learn spatial features directly from image pixels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 3 THE STATE OF THE ART · p. 5Since around 2010, deep learning methods have started to fulfill crucial roles in human affect recognition systems and are currently driving most state-of-the-art results in this field.
“Since around 2010, deep learning methods have started to fulfill crucial roles in human affect recognition systems. Indeed, it is safe to state that they are currently driving most state-of-the-art results in this field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3.1.4 Takeaways for spatial feature learning · p. 9Research strives towards 'deeper' models to achieve higher accuracy but runs into the problem of overfitting, which is the main challenge for current research.
“To achieve higher accuracy, research strives towards 'deeper' models (Fig. 4 illustrates this for FER), but runs into the problem of overfitting. This is the main challenge for current research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1.4 Takeaways for spatial feature learning · p. 9The full potential of deep learning in affect recognition may not have been seen yet.
“This suggests that the full potential of deep learning in affect recognition may not have been seen yet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Deep and handcrafted features are complementary in affect recognition.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.4 Towards learning deep models of affect · p. 5DNNs are more efficient at learning and representing the given functions, both statistically and regarding human involvement.
“As discussed in Section 2.1, DNNs are more efficient at learning and representing the given functions, both statistically and regarding human involvement [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] [20] Y. Bengio and Y. LeCun, 'Scaling learning algorithms towards ai,' in Large-Scale Kernel Machines , L. Bottou, O. Chapelle, D. DeCoste, and J. Weston, Eds. MIT Press, 2007, pp. 1-41. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 2 DEEP LEARNING FOR AFFECT RECOGNITION · p. 2Shallow architectures may not be the most efficient way to approach challenging learning problems such as affect recognition.
“it has been suggested that shallow architectures may not be the most efficient way to approach challenging learning problems such as affect recognition [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] [20] Y. Bengio and Y. LeCun, 'Scaling learning algorithms towards ai,' in Large-Scale Kernel Machines , L. Bottou, O. Chapelle, D. DeCoste, and J. Weston, Eds. MIT Press, 2007, pp. 1-41. -
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 7Pre-processing steps reduce the amount of variation the model has to account for, and thus simplify the learning task.
“These steps reduce the amount of variation the model has to account for, and thus simplify the learning task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.1.1 Learning spatial features for FER · p. 8In transfer learning, the goal is to use additional corpora to learn generic visual descriptors that are found to be effective in improving initial model parameters, and thus reduce overfitting.
“In transfer learning , the goal is to use additional corpora to learn generic visual descriptors that are found to be effective in improving initial model parameters [109], and thus reduce overfitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] [109] A. S. Razavian, H. Azizpour, J. Sullivan, and S. Carlsson, 'Cnn features off-the-shelf: An astounding baseline for recognition,' in Proc. CVPR Workshops , 2014, pp. 806-813. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9To avoid overfitting, both dropout and batch normalization can help to achieve better regularization.
“To avoid overfitting, both dropout [116] and batch normalization [33] can help to achieve better regularization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [116] [116] N. Srivastava, G. E. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov, 'Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting,' J. Mach. Learn. Res. , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1929-1958, 2014. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [33] [33] S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy, 'Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift,' in Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. , vol. 37, 2015, pp. 448-456. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.1.3 Learning spatial features from physiology · p. 9Another way to learn spatial features from the EEG signal is to reflect it as a 2D map representing the location of the electrodes on the head.
“Another way to learn spatial features from the EEG signal is to reflect it as a 2D map representing the location of the electrodes on the head [147].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [147] [147] J. Li, Z. Zhang, and H. He, 'Implementation of eeg emotion recognition system based on hierarchical convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Brain Inspired Cogn. Syst. , 2016, pp. 22-33. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoning§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10RNNs are well-suited to model the temporal variation of frame-level spatial features.
“The properties of RNNs, as discussed in Section 2.1, make them well-suited to model the temporal variation of frame-level spatial features.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 9Appearance features can be extended for spatio-temporal representation by considering a third orthogonal plane.
“Appearance features can be extended for spatio-temporal representation by considering a third orthogonal plane [96], [99].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [96] [96] M. M. Ghazi and H. K. Ekenel, 'Automatic emotion recognition in the wild using an ensemble of static and dynamic representations,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2016, pp. 514-521. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [99] [99] H. Kaya, F. G¨ urpınar, and A. A. Salah, 'Video-based emotion recognition in the wild using deep transfer learning and score fusion,' Image Vision Comput. , vol. 65, pp. 66-75, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 8Mirsamadi et al. [63] pointed out that most commonly used frame-level LLDs in SER can be derived from spectral representations of the raw speech signal.
“Mirsamadi et al. [63] pointed out that most commonly used frame-level LLDs in SER can be derived from spectral representations of the raw speech signal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] [63] S. Mirsamadi, E. Barsoum, and C. Zhang, 'Automatic speech emotion recognition using recurrent neural networks with local attention,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 2227-2231. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.1.2 Learning spatial features for SER · p. 9Semi-supervised learning can give access to knowledge contained in unlabeled datasets.
“Semi-supervised learning can give access to knowledge contained in unlabeled datasets [140].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [140] [140] J. Deng, X. Xu, Z. Zhang, S. Fr¨ uhholz, and B. Schuller, 'Universum autoencoder-based domain adaptation for speech emotion recognition,' IEEE Signal Process. Lett. , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 500-504, 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10The RNN approach allows processing long sequences and both sequence-level and continuous frame-level affect recognition on image sequences of arbitrary length.
“Advantages of this approach include the ability to process long sequences, and the possibility of both sequence-level and continuous frame-level affect recognition on image sequences of arbitrary length.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2.3 Learning temporal features for SER · p. 11Since there is no consensus in the literature over a 'universal' handcrafted feature set with superior performance, many recent studies have applied a 'bruteforce' approach, resulting in a large number of features per utterance.
“Since there is no consensus in the literature over a 'universal' handcrafted feature set with superior performance [121], many recent studies have applied a 'bruteforce' approach, resulting in a large number of features per utterance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] [121] F. Eyben, K. R. Scherer, B. W. Schuller, J. Sundberg, E. Andr´ e, C. Busso, L. Y. Devillers, J. Epps, P. Laukka, S. S. Narayanan et al. , 'The geneva minimalistic acoustic parameter set (gemaps) for voice research and affective computing,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 190-202, 2016. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10Slow fusion treats the time domain like a spatial domain, progressively learning low-level to high-level temporal features, and effectively reduces the amount of parameters required due to temporal depth, allowing for more input frames.
“For example, Gupta et al. [62] used a variant called slow fusion [153], which treats the time domain like a spatial domain, progressively learning low-level to highlevel temporal features. As the amount of parameters required due to the temporal depth of the input is effectively reduced, this allows for more input frames.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [62] [62] O. Gupta, D. Raviv, and R. Raskar, 'Multi-velocity neural networks for facial expression recognition in videos,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [153] [153] A. Karpathy, G. Toderici, S. Shetty, T. Leung, R. Sukthankar, and L. Fei-Fei, 'Large-scale video classification with convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. CVPR , 2014, pp. 1725-1732. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10When using 3D CNN for spatio-temporal modeling of image sequences, the line between spatial and temporal representation learning can be blurred.
“When using 3D CNN for spatio-temporal modeling of image sequences as discussed in Section 3.1.1, the line between spatial and temporal representation learning can be blurred.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 3.2.1 Learning temporal features for FER · p. 10End-to-end training of the entire CNN-LSTM system addresses the disconnected training problem and can lead to accuracy improvements.
“End-to-end training of the entire CNN-LSTM system addresses this problem, and can lead to accuracy improvements [108].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Learning joint feature representations · p. 12It is generally accepted in the literature that multimodal sensor combinations have complementary effects and thus may increase model accuracy.
“It is generally accepted in the literature that multimodal (e.g., audiovisual) sensor combinations have complementary effects and thus may increase model accuracy [11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] [11] Z. Zeng, M. Pantic, G. I. Roisman, and T. S. Huang, 'A survey of affect recognition methods: Audio, visual, and spontaneous expressions,' IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 39-58, 2009. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3.2 Learning joint features with physiological data · p. 13Ringeval et al. concluded that in feature-level fusion, ECG data helps for prediction of valence, but not arousal.
“They concluded that in featurelevel fusion, ECG data helps for prediction of valence, but not arousal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] [65] F. Ringeval, F. Eyben, E. Kroupi, A. Yuce, J.-P. Thiran, T. Ebrahimi, D. Lalanne, and B. Schuller, 'Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data,' Pattern Recognit. Lett. , vol. 66, pp. 22-30, 2015. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3.4 Databases and competitions · p. 13The ambiguity of human affect inherently makes both affect recognition and the labeling process difficult, and there is an accuracy limit in the degree of agreement between multiple labelers.
“The ambiguity of human affect inherently makes both affect recognition and the labeling process difficult-there is an accuracy limit in the degree of agreement between multiple labelers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.3.2 Learning joint features with physiological data · p. 13Ranganathan et al. demonstrated the feasibility of learning joint feature representations of AVP sensor data with approach J1 and a DBN, but did not compare performances of different modality combinations.
“Ranganathan et al. [149] demonstrated the feasibility of learning joint feature representations of AVP sensor data with approach J1 and a DBN, but do not compare the performances of different modality combinations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [149] [149] H. Ranganathan, S. Chakraborty, and S. Panchanathan, 'Multimodal emotion recognition using deep learning architectures,' in Proc. Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vision , 2016, pp. 1-9. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 14The higher difficulty and inherent ambiguity of affective displays, unreliable ground truth, and imbalanced datasets contribute to the limited impact of deep learning in affect recognition.
“This can in part be attributed to the higher difficulty and inherent ambiguity of affective displaysalthough many databases now provide annotations from multiple labelers, the ground truth tends to be unreliable and datasets are often imbalanced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.3.1 Learning joint features with audiovisual data · p. 13Tzirakis et al. used a two-layer LSTM network for feature fusion on raw audiovisual data with two CNNs, and it outperformed the state of the art.
“Learning from raw audiovisual data with two CNNs, Tzirakis et al. [108] used a two-layer LSTM network for feature fusion, which was found to outperform the state of the art.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [108] [108] P. Tzirakis, G. Trigeorgis, M. A. Nicolaou, B. Schuller, and S. Zafeiriou, 'End-to-end multimodal emotion recognition using deep neural networks,' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1301-1309, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.3.2 Learning joint features with physiological data · p. 13Both Yin et al. and Liu et al. found that the representation learned through feature-level fusion leads to improved accuracy over individual modalities.
“Both studies found that the representation learned through feature-level fusion leads to improved accuracy over individual modalities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [171] [171] Z. Yin, M. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Yang, and J. Zhang, 'Recognition of emotions using multimodal physiological signals and an ensemble deep learning model,' Comput. Meth. Programs Biomed. , vol. 140, pp. 93-110, 2017.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [175] [175] W. Liu, W.-L. Zheng, and B.-L. Lu, 'Emotion recognition using multimodal deep learning,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. , 2016, pp. 521-529. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.3.1 Learning joint features with audiovisual data · p. 12Zhang et al. used a DBN to fuse frame-level audiovisual features learned independently via CNNs, and the learned features are average-pooled for classification at the video level and lead to an improvement over state-of-the-art methods.
“Zhang et al. [85] used a DBN to fuse frame-level audiovisual features learned independently via CNNs; the learned features are averagepooled for classification at the video level and lead to an improvement over state-of-the-art methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] [85] S. Zhang, S. Zhang, T. Huang, W. Gao, and Q. Tian, 'Learning affective features with a hybrid deep model for audio-visual emotion recognition,' IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. , 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Premisecitation§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 12Learning from intermediate representations based on differential entropy also outperforms shallow models.
“Similar results are reported when learning from intermediate representations based on differential entropy [55].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] [55] X. Li, D. Song, P. Zhang, G. Yu, Y. Hou, and B. Hu, 'Emotion recognition from multi-channel eeg data through convolutional recurrent neural network,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Bioinf. and Biomed. , 2016, pp. 352-359. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2.4 Learning temporal features from physiological data · p. 12Yanagimoto and Sugimoto used a CNN on raw 16-channel EEG data to differentiate between positive and negative affective states, and this approach outperformed shallow models based on common features.
“Yanagimoto and Sugimoto [145] used a CNN on raw 16-channel EEG data to differentiate between positive and negative affective states, which is shown to outperform shallow models based on common features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [145] [145] M. Yanagimoto and C. Sugimoto, 'Recognition of persisting emotional valence from eeg using convolutional neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Workshop Computat. Intell. Appl. , 2016, pp. 27-32. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 14The small size of labeled datasets hinders the ability of deep models to generalize well and makes it difficult to train large models.
“It hinders the ability of deep models to generalize well, and makes it difficult to train large models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15Gupta et al. demonstrated the feasibility of semi-supervised learning for affective computing, achieving promising results using 2777 labeled face videos to learn from the AUTOENCODER dataset of 6.5M unlabeled face video clips.
“Gupta et al. [62] demonstrated the feasibility of semi-supervised learning for affective computing, achieving promising results using 2777 labeled face videos to learn from the AUTOENCODER dataset of 6.5M unlabeled face video clips.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] [62] O. Gupta, D. Raviv, and R. Raskar, 'Multi-velocity neural networks for facial expression recognition in videos,' IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15Most of these approaches train individual components separately, which may lead to suboptimal performance considering the whole system.
“However, most of these approaches train individual components separately (e.g., [106], [90]), which may lead to suboptimal performance considering the whole system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [106] [106] S. E. Kahou, V. Michalski, K. Konda, R. Memisevic, and C. Pal, 'Recurrent neural networks for emotion recognition in video,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Multimodal Interact. , 2015, pp. 467-474. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [90] [90] P. Khorrami, T. Le Paine, K. Brady, C. Dagli, and T. Huang, 'How deep neural networks can improve emotion recognition on video data,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Image Process. , 2016, pp. 619-623. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16In practice, specific details of available modalities and requirements regarding predictions are relevant factors, and available labels on common databases widely dictate which representation is used.
“In practice, specific details of available modalities (e.g., static images or video data) and requirements regarding predictions (e.g., continuous or video-level) are relevant factors, and available labels on common databases widely dictate which representation is used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15Mirsamadi et al. found that even a simple attention mechanism contributes to SER by learning to ignore silent frames, adding 1-2% to model accuracy.
“Mirsamadi et al. [63] found that even a simple attention mechanism contributes to SER by, for example, learning to ignore silent frames-an improvement that is easily interpretable and adds 1-2% to model accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] [63] S. Mirsamadi, E. Barsoum, and C. Zhang, 'Automatic speech emotion recognition using recurrent neural networks with local attention,' in Proc. ICASSP , 2017, pp. 2227-2231. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15Future multimodal affect recognition systems are likely to be trained in an end-to-end fashion, which aligns training of the entire network closer with the true performance measure but requires a larger amount of training examples.
“Future multimodal affect recognition systems are likely to be trained in an end-to-end fashion, which aligns training of the entire network closer with the true performance measure [195] but requires a larger amount of training examples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [195] [195] A. Graves and N. Jaitly, 'Towards end-to-end speech recognition with recurrent neural networks,' in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. , 2014, pp. 1764-1772.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15Handcrafted features are readily available, widely recognized, and well-designed for specific applications such as FER and SER.
“This can be attributed to multiple factors: Handcrafted features are readily available, widely recognized, and well-designed for specific applications such as FER and SER.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16Given the nature of sensor data in typical HCI scenarios, dimensional representations and combinations of categorical and dimensional models of affect will become even more relevant as a more natural way of dealing with continuous data.
“However, given the nature of sensor data in typical HCI scenarios, it can be expected that dimensional representations, and combinations of categorical and dimensional models of affect will become even more relevant as a more natural way of dealing with continuous data [53].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] [53] H. Gunes and B. Schuller, 'Categorical and dimensional affect analysis in continuous input: Current trends and future directions,' Image Vision Comput. , vol. 31, pp. 120-136, 2013. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16DNNs are often described as 'black boxes', as their inner workings are complex and difficult to interpret.
“In general, DNNs are often described as 'black boxes', as their inner workings are complex and difficult to interpret.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15This development suggests that affect recognition too may benefit from much larger datasets.
“This development suggests that affect recognition too may benefit from much larger datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15While unsupervised learning allows models to learn better initial parameters from unlabeled datasets, fine-tuning with labeled data is still required to guide the model towards its learning goal.
“While unsupervised learning allows models to learn better initial parameters from unlabeled datasets, fine-tuning with labeled data is still required to 'guide' the model towards its learning goal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15The labeling process for video-based affective datasets, especially with continuous annotations, is expensive and cannot easily be automated.
“The labeling process for video-based affective datasets, especially with continuous annotations, is expensive and cannot easily be automated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 16Such results indicate that the study of DNNs in affective computing could contribute to interdisciplinary emotion research by giving a further perspective on affective displays and their representation in general.
“Such results indicate that the study of DNNs in affective computing could contribute to interdisciplinary emotion research by giving a further perspective on affective displays and their representation in general.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15Unsupervised learning has proved successful in SER; Deng et al. improved the training process on labeled data by exploiting knowledge from unlabeled data using AEs.
“Unsupervised learning has also proved successful in SER-for example, Deng et al. [140] were able to improve the training process on labeled data by exploiting knowledge from unlabeled data using AEs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [140] [140] J. Deng, X. Xu, Z. Zhang, S. Fr¨ uhholz, and B. Schuller, 'Universum autoencoder-based domain adaptation for speech emotion recognition,' IEEE Signal Process. Lett. , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 500-504, 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4 DISCUSSION · p. 15There are few specialized architectures researchers can draw from, which is why many fall back to ones from object recognition.
“There are few specialized architectures researchers can draw from, which is why many fall back to ones from object recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Automatic human affect recognition is a key step towards more natural human-computer interaction.
“Automatic human affect recognition is a key step towards more natural human-computer interaction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Labeled data and computation time are limited and costly.
“Labeled data and computation time are limited and costly, incentivizing the adoption of such models in affect recognition.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Deep and handcrafted features are complementary in affect recognition.
“This suggests that deep and handcrafted features are complementary. As of this writing, the findings of most studies doing related comparisons support this assumption [96], [97], [98], [99], though in many cases a comparison is difficult as reported accuracies for wellperforming fusion approaches include features from other modalities (see Section 3.3).”
“However, in contrast to fields such as object- and speech recognition, both are often found to be complementary in affect recognition as of this writing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The reviewed studies' reported comparisons between shallow and deep architectures are valid and comparable enough to aggregate.
“Particularly, our results show that out of the 150 studies reporting comparisons between shallow and deep architectures, 95% reported that deep learning can lead to improvements over conventional approaches.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 233 studies included in the review are representative of the literature on deep learning for affect recognition.
“Of the 233 studies in our review, only 11% involved private databases not available to the public.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The classification scheme used to indicate the use of deep learning in the reviewed studies is valid.
“We employ the classification scheme introduced in Table 1 and used throughout this review to indicate the use of deep learning in these studies.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deep learning can be performed by various types of neural networks such as CNNs, DNNs, and RNNs, to recognize objects, track movements, and analyze behavior in video data.
“Deep learning can be performed by various types of neural networks such as CNNs [39][40][41][42], DNNs [43,44], and RNNs [45,46], to recognize objects, track movements, and analyze behavior in video data [47].”
From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
Section 3.2.2 (p. 10) describes using skeletal and shoulder tracking to extract features of body movement for affect recognition. The Discussion (p. 15) also describes deep-learning models analyzing facial expressions and video segments. The paper supports movement and affect analysis, but not the broader claim that these methods recognize objects or analyze behavior generally in video data. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 202 · Cited by 243
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning
- 10.1109/TAFFC.2017.2763942 · DOI
- zhang, 2017, Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization, Proc Int Conf Learn Represent, 1
- aytar, 2016, SoundNet: Learning sound representations from unlabeled video, Proc 30th Int Conf Neural Inf Process Syst, 1
- schuller, 2013, The INTERSPEECH 2013 computational paralinguistics challenge, Proc Annu Conf Int Speech Commun Assoc, 148
- Authors
- Rouast, P. V., Adam, M. T. P., & Chiong, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
- Published
- 2021-04-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 524-543
- ISSN
- 1949-3045 (ISSN-L)
- 2371-9850
- OpenAlex
- W2907891676
- Semantic Scholar
- 832ca3fd1e6d5beb10ac4de052cc803ad1715a9c
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 202
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14
- FWCI
- 33.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Australian Government (10.13039/100015539)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- deep neural network, multimodal sensor fusion, audiovisual information, physiological sensors, feature representation learning, spatial feature representation, human-computer interaction, affective computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review