The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Energy budgeting for CubeSats with an integrated FPGA
Abstract
CubeSats are a simple, low-cost option for developing quickly-deployable satellites, however, the tradeoff for these benefits is a small physical size, which restricts the CubeSat's solar panels' size and thus the available power budget and stored energy reserves. These power/energy limitations restrict the CubeSat's functionality and data processing capabilities, which makes leveraging CubeSats for compute-intensive missions challenging. Additionally, increasing sensor capabilities due to technological advances further compounds this functionality limitation, enabling sensors to gather significantly more data than a satellite's limited downlink bandwidth can accommodate. The influx in sensed data, which is particularly high for image-processing applications, introduces a pressing need for high-performance on-board data processing, which preprocesses and/or compresses the data before transmission. FPGAs have been incorporated into state-of-the-art satellites to provide high-performance on-board data processing, while simultaneously reducing the satellites' data processing energy consumption. However, even though FPGAs can provide these capabilities in full-scale satellites, a CubeSat's limited power budget makes integration of FPGAs into CubeSats a challenging task. For example, the commonly used Virtex4QV Radiation Tolerant FPGA family's average power consumption ranges from 1.25 to 12.5 Watts, whereas the CubeSat's power budget ranges from 2 to 8 Watts, with the smallest, cheapest CubeSat systems at the lower end of this range. Therefore, in order to successfully integrate FPGAs into CubeSats, the components' power consumptions must be clearly budgeted with respect to the CubeSat's specific functionalities and orbital pattern, which dictates the available power and stored energy reserves. In this paper, we present two detailed energy reserve budgeting case studies for FPGA-based CubeSats with respect to stored energy reserves for image compression and processing using a Canny edge detector. CubeSat designers can leverage this energy reserve budget with the application-specific components' power consumptions for applications such as hyper-spectral imaging (HSI), ground motion target indication (GMTI), and star tracking to quickly determine maximum payload operational time with respect to specific orbital patterns and mission requirements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Scott et al. [8] evaluated the power budget using one unit (1U) and a three-unit (3U) CubeSat for an image processing mission using a Canny filter.”
From A Method for Validating CubeSat Satellite EPS Through Power Budget Analysis Aligned With Mission Requirements (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- morris, 2010, Veni! Vidi! Virtex! (and Kintex and Artix Too), FPGA J
- long, 0, A CubeSat Derived Design for a Unique Academic Research Mission in Earthquake Signature Detection, 16th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites Utah USA 2002
- 0, Mike's List of CubeSat Satellite Missions [Online]
- 10.1109/AERO.2008.4526468 · DOI
- 10.1109/5.364464 · DOI
- 10.1109/ECRTS.2006.28 · DOI
- jacobs, 0, Multiparadigm Computing for Space-Based Synthetic Aperture Radar, Proceedings of 2008 International Conference on Engineering of Reconfigurable Systems and Algorithms (ERSA) Las Vegas NV July 14-17 2008
- 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.10.035 · DOI
- neoh, 0, Adaptive Edge Detection for Real-Time Video Processing using FPGAs, GSPx 2004 Conference 2004
- 10.1109/AERO.2002.1036865 · DOI
- nason, 2001, CubeSat Design Specifications Document, Revision V, 1
- 0, Datasheet Preliminary Specifications 1/5" CMOS (2 Megapixel) Image Sensor with OmniPixel3-HS Technology
- eagle, 0, Shadow Conditions of the Earth in Circular Orbits [Online]
- pingree, 0, The Prototype Development Phase of the CubeSat On-board processing Validation Experiment (COVE), IEEE Proc 2011 Aerospace Conference Big Sky MT 2011
- puig-suari, 2001, Development of the standard CubeSat deployer and a CubeSat class PicoSatellite, Aerospace Conference 2001 IEEE Proceedings, 1, 10.1109/AERO.2001.931726 · DOI
- 10.1109/AERO.2007.353106 · DOI
- schaffner, 0, The Electronic System Design, Analysis, Integration, and Construction of the Cal Poly State University CP1 CubeSat, 16th AIAA/USU on Small Satellites Conference Logan UT October 2002, 1
- 10.1109/AERO.2008.4526293 · DOI
- 2005, Spartan-3 Vs Cyclone I Performance Analysis
- 0, Altera Powerplay Early Power Estimators
- 2007, Stratix III FPGAs vs Xilinx Virtex-5 Devices Architecture and Perfomance Comparison
- heidt, 0, CubeSat: A new generation of picosatellite for education and industry low-cost space experimentation, Proceedings of the 14th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites SSC00-V-5 Logan UT Aug 2000
- alminde, 0, The AAU-CubeSat student satellite project: Architectural overview and lessons learned, ACA 2004 16th IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace
- 0, 7-series Power Estimator
- bock, 2002, Efficient Precise Orbit Determination of LEO Satellites Using GPS Advances in Space Research, 30, 295
- bleier, 2003, Quakesat Lessons Learned Notes from the Development of a Triple Cubesat
- bernardi, 2004, On the evaluation of SEU sensitiveness in SRAM-based FPGAs, Proc 10th IEEE IOLTS, 10, 115
- 0, Xilinx ISE Design Suite 13 2
- 10.1109/AERO.2010.5446700 · DOI
- david, 2006, CubeSat Losses Spur New Development [Online]
- harris, 2008, If only the original Spartans could have thrived on so little power, Electronic Design
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acero, I. F., Diaz, J., Hurtado-Velasco, R., Bautista, S. R. G., Rincón, S., Hernández, F. L., Rodriguez-Ferreira, J., & Gonzalez-Llorente, J. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3271596 · Cited by 24
“[8] evaluated the power budget using one unit (1U) and a three-unit (3U)”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnold, S. S., Nuzzaci, R., & Gordon-Ross, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- ORCID
- Gordon-Ross, A.
- Venue
- 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-03
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 1095-323X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093932908
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Space Technology and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Embedded Systems Design Techniques
- Keywords
- CubeSat, FPGA, energy budgeting, power budget, on-board processing, image compression, Canny edge detection, power consumption, hyperspectral imaging, star tracking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review