Cited by 52Spacecraft Design and TechnologySpace exploration and regulationSpacecraft Dynamics and Control

Cost and risk analysis of small satellite constellations for earth observation

Nag, Sreeja, LeMoigne, Jacqueline, de Weck, Olivier·2014·2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference

Abstract

Distributed Space Missions (DSMs) are gaining momentum in their application to Earth science missions owing to their ability to increase observation sampling in spatial, spectral, temporal and angular dimensions. Past literature from academia and industry have proposed and evaluated many cost models for spacecraft as well as methods for quantifying risk. However, there have been few comprehensive studies quantifying the cost for multiple spacecraft, for small satellites and the cost risk for the operations phase of the project which needs to be budgeted for when designing and building efficient architectures. This paper identifies the three critical problems with the applicability of current cost and risk models to distributed small satellite missions and uses data-based modeling to suggest changes that can be made in some of them to improve applicability. Learning curve parameters to make multiple copies of the same unit, technological complexity based costing and COTS enabled small satellite costing have been studied and insights provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/aero.2014.6836396

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nag, S., LeMoigne, J., & de Weck, O.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
Venue
2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-03
Pages
1-16
ISSN
1095-323X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065242143
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Goddard Space Flight Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Keywords
small satellite constellations, Earth observation, cost model, risk analysis, learning curve, technological complexity, commercial off-the-shelf components, mission architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review