Cost and risk analysis of small satellite constellations for earth observation
Abstract
Distributed Space Missions (DSMs) are gaining momentum in their application to Earth science missions owing to their ability to increase observation sampling in spatial, spectral, temporal and angular dimensions. Past literature from academia and industry have proposed and evaluated many cost models for spacecraft as well as methods for quantifying risk. However, there have been few comprehensive studies quantifying the cost for multiple spacecraft, for small satellites and the cost risk for the operations phase of the project which needs to be budgeted for when designing and building efficient architectures. This paper identifies the three critical problems with the applicability of current cost and risk models to distributed small satellite missions and uses data-based modeling to suggest changes that can be made in some of them to improve applicability. Learning curve parameters to make multiple copies of the same unit, technological complexity based costing and COTS enabled small satellite costing have been studied and insights provided.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Collaborative gaming and competition for CS-STEM education using SPHERES Zero Robotics
Nag, S., Katz, J. G., & Saenz-Otero, A. (2013) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.09.006 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, X., Wu, G., Xing, L., & Pedrycz, W. (2021) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2020.2997050 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Robust earth observation satellite scheduling with uncertainty of cloud coverage
Wang, X., Song, G., Leus, R., & Han, C. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.2019.2947978 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Tradespace analysis tool for designing constellations (TAT-C)
Le Moigne, J., Dabney, P., de Weck, O., Foreman, V., Grogan, P., Holland, M., Hughes, S., & Nag, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) · doi:10.1109/igarss.2017.8127168 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationScheduling multiple agile Earth observation satellites with multiple observations
Wang, X., Han, C., & Leus, R. (2026) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2025.10.042 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nag, S., LeMoigne, J., & de Weck, O.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
- ORCID
- Nag, Sreeja
- Venue
- 2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-03
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 1095-323X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065242143
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
- Goddard Space Flight Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Keywords
- small satellite constellations, Earth observation, cost model, risk analysis, learning curve, technological complexity, commercial off-the-shelf components, mission architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review