Cited by 57Spacecraft Design and TechnologySpacecraft Dynamics and ControlSystems Engineering Methodologies and Applications

Tradespace analysis tool for designing constellations (TAT-C)

Open access
Le Moigne, Jacqueline, Dabney, Philip, de Weck, Olivier, Foreman, Veronica, Grogan, Paul, Holland, Matthew, Hughes, Steven, Nag, Sreeja·2017·2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)

Abstract

While there is growing interest in implementing future NASA Earth Science missions as Distributed Spacecraft Missions (DSMs), there are currently very few tools available to help in the design of DSMs. The objective of our project is to provide a framework that facilitates DSM Pre-Phase A investigations and optimizes DSM designs with respect to a-priori Science goals. Our Trade-space Analysis Tool for Constellations (TAT-C) enables the investigation of questions such as: “Which type of constellations should be chosen? How many spacecraft should be included in the constellation? Which design has the best cost/risk value?”. This paper provides a description of the TAT-C tool and its components.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/igarss.2017.8127168

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. le moigne, 0, An Overview of Distributed Spacecraft Missions (DSM), preparation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Le Moigne, J., Dabney, P., de Weck, O., Foreman, V., Grogan, P., Holland, M., Hughes, S., & Nag, S.
Affiliations
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
1181-1184
OpenAlex
W2774991589
Cited by
56
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Keywords
trade space analysis, design optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review