Cited by 178Smart Agriculture and AIUAV Applications and OptimizationAerospace Engineering and Control Systems

Autonomous UAV with vision based on-board decision making for remote sensing and precision agriculture

Alsalam, Bilal Hazim Younus, Morton, Kye, Campbell, Duncan, Gonzalez, Felipe·2017·2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference

Abstract

In recent years, a phenomenal increase in the development of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) has been observed in a broad range of applications in various fields of study. Precision agriculture has emerged as a major field of interest, integrating unmanned monitoring of crop health into general agricultural practices for researchers are utilizing UAV to collect data for post-analysis. This paper describes a modular and generic system that is able to control the UAV using computer vision. A configuration approach similar to the Observation, Orientation, Decision and Action (OODA) loop has been implemented to allow the system to perform on-board decision making. The detection of an object of interest is performed by computer vision functionality. This allows the UAV to change its planned path accordingly and approach the target in order to perform a close inspection, or conduct a manoeuvres such as the application of herbicide or collection of higher resolution agricultural images. The results show the ability of the developed system to dynamically change its current goal and implement an inspection manoeuvre to perform necessary actions after detecting the target. The vision based navigation system and on-board decision making were demonstrated in three types of tests: ArUco Marker detection, colour detection and weed detection. The results are measured based on the sensitivity and the selectivity of the algorithm. The sensitivity is the ability of the algorithm to identify and detect the true positive target while the selectivity is the capability of the algorithm to filter out the false negatives for detection targets. Results indicate that the system is capable of detecting ArUco Markers with 99% sensitivity and 100% selectivity at 5 m above the ground level. The system is also capable of detecting a red target with 96% sensitivity and 99% selectivity at the same height during a test height at 5 metres. This system has potential applicability in the field of precision agriculture such as, crop health monitoring, pest plant detection which causes detrimental financial damage to crop yields if not noticed at an early stage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/aero.2017.7943593

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Alsalam, B. H. Y., Morton, K., Campbell, D., & Gonzalez, F.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-03
Pages
1-12
ISSN
1095-323X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2623923152
Cited by
178
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2
FWCI
37.74
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Keywords
autonomous UAV, visual navigation, OODA loop, precision agriculture, remote sensing, color recognition, weed detection, crop health monitoring, path planning, herbicide application, plant pest detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review