The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Micro-UAV Detection and Classification from RF Fingerprints Using Machine Learning Techniques
Open accessAbstract
This paper focuses on the detection and classification of micro-unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)using radio frequency (RF)fingerprints of the signals transmitted from the controller to the micro-UAV. In the detection phase, raw signals are split into frames and transformed into the wavelet domain to remove the bias in the signals and reduce the size of data to be processed. A naive Bayes approach, which is based on Markov models generated separately for UAV and non-UAV classes, is used to check for the presence of a UAV in each frame. In the classification phase, unlike the traditional approaches that rely solely on time-domain signals and corresponding features, the proposed technique uses the energy transient signal. This approach is more robust to noise and can cope with different modulation techniques. First, the normalized energy trajectory is generated from the energy-time-frequency distribution of the raw control signal. Next, the start and end points of the energy transient are detected by searching for the most abrupt changes in the mean of the energy trajectory. Then, a set of statistical features is extracted from the energy transient. Significant features are selected by performing neighborhood component analysis (NCA)to keep the computational cost of the algorithm low. Finally, selected features are fed to several machine learning algorithms for classification. The algorithms are evaluated experimentally using a database containing 100 RF signals from each of 14 different UAV controllers. The signals are recorded wirelessly using a high-frequency oscilloscope. The data set is randomly partitioned into training and test sets for validation with the ratio 4:1. Ten Monte Carlo simulations are run and results are averaged to assess the performance of the methods. All the micro-UAVs are detected correctly and an average accuracy of 96.3% is achieved using the k-nearest neighbor (kNN)classification. Proposed methods are also tested for different signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)levels and results are reported.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Machine Learning-Based Drone Detection and Classification: State-of-the-Art in Research
Taha, B., & Shoufan, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2942944 · Cited by 375
A Comprehensive Review of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Attacks and Neutralization Techniques
Chamola, V., Kotesh, P., Agarwal, A., Naren, Gupta, N., & Guizani, M. (2021) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2020.102324 · Cited by 367
A Survey on Machine-Learning Techniques for UAV-Based Communications
Bithas, P. S., Michailidis, E. T., Nomikos, N., Vouyioukas, D., & Kanatas, A. G. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19235170 · Cited by 353
A Review of Counter-UAS Technologies for Cooperative Defensive Teams of Drones
Castrillo, V. U., Manco, A., Pascarella, D., & Gigante, G. (2022) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones6030065 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Ezuma, M., Erden, F., Anjinappa, C. K., Ozdemir, O., & Guvenc, I.
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-03
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1095-323X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912917027
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Micro-UAV Detection and Classification from RF Fingerprints Using Machine Learning Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/aero.2019.8741970
- The paper
- Ezuma, M., Erden, F., Anjinappa, C. K., Ozdemir, O., & Guvenc, I. (2019). Micro-UAV Detection and Classification from RF Fingerprints Using Machine Learning Techniques. 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero.2019.8741970
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.