Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Micro-UAV Detection and Classification from RF Fingerprints Using Machine Learning Techniques

Open access
Ezuma, Martins, Erden, Fatih, Anjinappa, Chethan Kumar, Ozdemir, Ozgur, Guvenc, Ismail·2019·2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference

Abstract

This paper focuses on the detection and classification of micro-unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)using radio frequency (RF)fingerprints of the signals transmitted from the controller to the micro-UAV. In the detection phase, raw signals are split into frames and transformed into the wavelet domain to remove the bias in the signals and reduce the size of data to be processed. A naive Bayes approach, which is based on Markov models generated separately for UAV and non-UAV classes, is used to check for the presence of a UAV in each frame. In the classification phase, unlike the traditional approaches that rely solely on time-domain signals and corresponding features, the proposed technique uses the energy transient signal. This approach is more robust to noise and can cope with different modulation techniques. First, the normalized energy trajectory is generated from the energy-time-frequency distribution of the raw control signal. Next, the start and end points of the energy transient are detected by searching for the most abrupt changes in the mean of the energy trajectory. Then, a set of statistical features is extracted from the energy transient. Significant features are selected by performing neighborhood component analysis (NCA)to keep the computational cost of the algorithm low. Finally, selected features are fed to several machine learning algorithms for classification. The algorithms are evaluated experimentally using a database containing 100 RF signals from each of 14 different UAV controllers. The signals are recorded wirelessly using a high-frequency oscilloscope. The data set is randomly partitioned into training and test sets for validation with the ratio 4:1. Ten Monte Carlo simulations are run and results are averaged to assess the performance of the methods. All the micro-UAVs are detected correctly and an average accuracy of 96.3% is achieved using the k-nearest neighbor (kNN)classification. Proposed methods are also tested for different signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)levels and results are reported.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/aero.2019.8741970

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Ezuma, M., Erden, F., Anjinappa, C. K., Ozdemir, O., & Guvenc, I.
Venue
2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-03
Pages
1-13
ISSN
1095-323X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912917027
Cited by
228
References
0
FWCI
10.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Micro-UAV Detection and Classification from RF Fingerprints Using Machine Learning Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/aero.2019.8741970
The paper
Ezuma, M., Erden, F., Anjinappa, C. K., Ozdemir, O., & Guvenc, I. (2019). Micro-UAV Detection and Classification from RF Fingerprints Using Machine Learning Techniques. 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero.2019.8741970

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.