Cited by 2IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingCloud Computing and Resource ManagementDistributed systems and fault tolerance

Proactive Fault Tolerant Service Management in Edge Computing

Tambe, Supriya Dilip, A., Antony Franklin·2023·2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS)

Abstract

Edge computing technology facilitates the deployment of real-time services near users by reducing latency and increasing efficient bandwidth utilization compared to cloud computing. The edge servers are usually heterogeneous and resource-constrained. To effectively utilize these edge resources, it is required to efficiently deploy different real-time latency-sensitive edge services so that maximum users will serve. In a pay-per-use edge environment, service providers can not deploy all services on all available edge servers, which is costly for service providers. Further, due to hardware/software issues or overloading, any edge server may fail after service deployment and hamper critical edge services’ system performance. In such a failure-prone environment, designing fault-tolerant service deployment strategies is essential to reduce the impact of the failures. In this paper, we propose a two-stage method, which includes the optimal approach for selecting a primary server to increase user coverage and a heuristic approach for impact-based service deployment within budget to choose a backup server. These stages also verify the overloading of services and user requests on the edge servers to reduce edge failures. Several experiments are conducted to analyze the proposed approach on real-world data. Compared to various baseline approaches, our solution efficiently increases user coverage (15%) and reduces failure impact by having a backup server (25%) for most users to increase availability within the deployment budget.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ants59832.2023.10469661

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tambe, S. D., & A., A. F.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Technology,Department of Computer Science,Hyderabad,India
Venue
2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-12-17
Pages
616-621
OpenAlex
W4393141282
Cited by
2
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Keywords
edge computing, fault tolerance, service deployment, user coverage, service availability, latency-sensitive services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review