Multimodal continuous affect recognition based on LSTM and multiple kernel learning
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network (LSTM-RNN) and multiple kernel learning (MKL) based multi-modal affect recognition scheme (LSTM-MKL). It takes the LSTM-RNN advantage to model the long range dependencies between successive observations, and uses the MKL power to model the non-linear correlations between the inputs and outputs. For each of the affect dimensions (arousal, valence, expectancy, and power), two LSTM-RNN models are trained, one for each modality. In the recognition phase, the audio and visual features are input to the corresponding learned LSTM models, which in turn produce initial estimates of the affect dimensions. The LSTM outputs are further input into a multi-kernel support vector regression (MK-SVR) for the final recognition. Experimental results carried out on the AVEC2012 database, show that compared to the traditional SVR-LLR (Support Vector Machine - local linear regression) or MK-SVR fusion scheme, the proposed LSTM-MKL fusion scheme obtains higher recognition results, with an correlation coefficient (COR) of 0.354, compared to a COR of 0.124 for SVR-LLR, and 0.168 for MK-SVR, respectively.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Depending on the nature of the source audio, it can be beneficial to apply HSFs to frame-level LLDs according to a sliding window before applying the RNN.
“Depending on the nature of the source audio, it can be beneficial to apply HSFs to frame-level LLDs according to a sliding window before applying the RNN [151], [65].”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [151]
LSTM is found to outperform state-of-the-art techniques like SVR.
“Here, LSTMis found to outperform state-of-the-art techniques like SVR (e.g., [150], [151]).”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [151]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments
Rouast, P. V., Adam, M. T. P., & Chiong, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2018.2890471 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wei, J., Pei, E., Jiang, D., Sahli, H., Xie, L., & Fu, Z.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
- Venue
- Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 1-4
- OpenAlex
- W2011326218
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- long short-term memory, multiple kernel learning, support vector regression, audiovisual integration, long-range dependency modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review