A unified approach to failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA)
Open accessAbstract
A unified approach in performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) is described. This procedure provides a technique for performing a thorough analysis that can identify engineering problem areas and failure modes at specific plant levels, and contribute to the validity of design review process. It provides formats for documenting plant/equipment operating characteristics so that failure modes can readily be identified with a functional characteristic. In addition, it gives an analytical technique that can identify necessary corrective action with which top management can make critical decisions.>
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The proposed method integrates the traditional FMECA formulation and available standards (GPR 7120.4A; MIL-STD-1629) by suggesting a 5-steps procedure.
“The proposed method integrates the traditional FMECA formulation [28] and available standards (GPR 7120.4A; MIL-STD-1629), by suggesting a 5-steps procedure, detailed in the following paragraphs (Sections 3.1-3.5).”
From A Reliability Engineering Approach for Managing Risks in CubeSats (2018) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review of security issues in industrial networks
Cheminod, M., Durante, L., & Valenzano, A. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2012.2198666 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
A Reliability Engineering Approach for Managing Risks in CubeSats
Menchinelli, A., Ingiosi, F., Pamphili, L., Marzioli, P., Patriarca, R., Costantino, F., & Piergentili, F. (2018) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace5040121 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wei, B. C.
- Venue
- Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 1991 Proceedings
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2002-12-09
- Pages
- 260-271
- ISSN
- 0149-144X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1936714244
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zenodo.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS) (publishedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Keywords
- FMECA, failure mode identification, design review, corrective actions, reliability analysis, functional properties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
