Cited by 54Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingSpeech and dialogue systems

Personalization of end-to-end speech recognition on mobile devices for named entities

Open access
Sim, Khe Chai, Beaufays, Francoise, Benard, Arnaud, Guliani, Dhruv, Kabel, Andreas, Khare, Nikhil, Lucassen, Tamar, Zadrazil, Petr +4 more·2019·2019 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU)

Abstract

We study the effectiveness of several techniques to personalize end-to-end speech models and improve the recognition of proper names relevant to the user. These techniques differ in the amounts of user effort required to provide supervision, and are evaluated on how they impact speech recognition performance. We propose using keyword-dependent precision and recall metrics to measure vocabulary acquisition performance. We evaluate the algorithms on a dataset that we designed to contain names of persons that are difficult to recognize. Therefore, the baseline recall rate for proper names in this dataset is very low: 2.4%. A data synthesis approach we developed brings it to 48.6%, with no need for speech input from the user. With speech input, if the user corrects only the names, the name recall rate improves to 64.4%. If the user corrects all the recognition errors, we achieve the best recall of 73.5%. To eliminate the need to upload user data and store personalized models on a server, we focus on performing the entire personalization workflow on a mobile device.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/asru46091.2019.9003775

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In information theory, compression guarantees are instance specific and depend on the entropy of the underlying distribution.

    “However usually in information theory, the compression guarantees are instance specific and depend on the entropy of the underlying distribution [140].”

    From Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [140]

    Section 3.2.2 discusses a Fisher-information-based regularizer for personalizing speech-recognition models, not information-theoretic compression guarantees. A search for entropy, compression, and distribution-dependent guarantees found no passage in our copy addressing the claim; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Keith Hall, Eunjoon Cho, Cyril Allauzen, Franc ¸oise Beaufays, Noah Coccaro, Kaisuke Nakajima, Michael Riley, Brian Roark, David Rybach, and Linda Zhang, "Composition-based on-the-fly rescoring for salient n- gram biasing," in Sixteenth Annual Conference of the In- ternational Speech Communication Association, 2015, pp. 1418-1422.
  2. Tom Bagby, Kanishka Rao, and Khe Chai Sim, "Effi- cient implementation of recurrent neural network trans- ducer in TensorFlow," in 2018 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT). IEEE, 2018, pp. 506-512.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sim, K. C., Beaufays, F., Benard, A., Guliani, D., Kabel, A., Khare, N., Lucassen, T., Zadrazil, P., Zhang, H., Johnson, L., Motta, G., & Zhou, L.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
2019 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-12
Pages
23-30
OpenAlex
W2996545246
Cited by
54
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8
FWCI
2.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
end-to-end speech recognition, personalization, named entity recognition, proper names, mobile devices, vocabulary acquisition, data synthesis, user corrections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review